Dutch election 2017

Today I will discuss the concept of  vision concession, which is the term I am coining for what I have been watching mainstream politicians do immediately after the results of the May 15th Dutch general election were announced.

Basically, before the election, Geert Wilders was talking about how the PVV with its platform of shutting down all mosques (even Trump hasn’t gone that far (yet…..)) would easily win the whole thing. For newcomers, here is a brief refresher on Wilders and the PVV: 


The country’s fast-rising far-right leader, Geert Wilders [Jew], is getting help from American conservatives attracted to his anti-European Union and anti-Islam views. David Horowitz [Jew], an American right-wing activist, has contributed roughly $150,000 to Mr. Wilders’s Party for Freedom over two years — of which nearly $120,000 came in 2015, making it the largest individual contribution in the Dutch political system that year, according to recently released records.

Daniel Pipes [Jew], another conservative American activist and a Harvard-educated historian known for his controversial statements on Islam, said in an email exchange that he hoped “the rise of the insurgent parties leads not to their forming governments but their sending a strong message to the legacy parties to wake up and deal with the imperative issues they have so long ignored.”

Mr. Pipes said his foundation, the Middle East Forum, provided money in the “six figures” to help pay legal bills in Mr. Wilders’s trial over the film, but specifically to a legal fund, and has not provided political support. Mr. Pipes has called Mr. Wilders “the most important European alive today,” but has differed with him on his view of Islam, though he himself has expressed inflammatory views on the subject.

Dutch records also show that two American foundations paid for Mr. Wilders’s flights and hotels on trips to the United States last year. One, the Gatestone Institute, lists John R. Bolton, a combative former United Nations ambassador under George W. Bush, as its chairman. Another, the International Freedom Alliance Foundation, is backed by Robert J. Shillman [Jew], a wealthy Trump supporter who paid for a digital ad in Times Square last year depicting Mr. Trump as Superman.

As it turned out, the PVV came second behind the VVD, though it gained a larger share of the vote (13.1%) than it had been holding before (10.1%), and thus increased its number of seats to 20 from its former 15.

What disturbs me is how mainstream politicians are interpreting this as a “defeat” for the PVV, despite the fact that the PVV has actually become more powerful, merely because it did not become as powerful as Wilders claimed it that would. In other words, mainstream politicians have in their own minds already conceded to Wilders’ vision that the PVV is the party that is supposed to win in present times, and hence view merely stavng off this win as “success”, when – by any absolute measure – seeing the PVV move nearer to its goal compared to its previous position should be interpreted as failure.

Here are the mainstream politicians in their own words:


Dutch people rejected “the wrong kind of populism”, Prime Minister Mark Rutte has said

How is it a “rejection” when the PVV has outright gained seats? Not to mention that Rutte himself(!) has been effectively pressured by Wilders to move his own rhetoric rightwards during this campaign, so he should be the last person able to talk with a straight face about “rejecting” PVV rhetoric…..

(Also, the PVV is no kind of populism at all. There is nothing “populist” about any far-right party. The correct definition of populism is standing up for ordinary people against the power elite. Virtually all “Third World”-origin immigrants – especially refugees – are ordinary people; virtually none are power elite. The far-right does not stand up for “Third World”-origin immigrants. Therefore the far-right is NOT populist.)

French President Francois Hollande said he had won a “clear victory against extremism”

How is it a “victory” when the mainstream parties have lost aggregate territory to the PVV?

(Also, the PVV is bad not because of its extremism. The PVV is bad because of its Islamophobia and pro-Zionism. Extreme anti-Islamophobia and extreme anti-Zionism are good.)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel hailed a “very pro-European result, a clear signal… and a good day for democracy” and her chief of staff, Peter Altmaier, tweeted: “The Netherlands, oh the Netherlands you are a champion!”

How is it a “clear signal” when the PVV is not on a consistent downward trajectory? (It won 9 seats in 2006, 24 in 2010, 15 in 2012 and 20 in 2017. OK, 20 is admittedly lower than its own record high of 24, so at least it is not breaking records, but there is nothing “clear” about its trajectory in the eyes of any non-delusional statistician.) And how is the Netherlands a “champion” for allowing the PVV, which had been declining between 2010 and 2012, to start rising again?

When the PVV has been reduced to fewer than 9 seats – that is to say, fewer than its own record low - then perhaps we can begin to speak cautiously of its decline. When the PVV has been reduced to the condition that Britain’s BNP is in, then perhaps we can relax slightly. Not until then. Few things are so dangerous as a false sense of security.

(And even in scenarios where the PVV has no seats at all, it should still be treated as an active enemy organization. An enemy organization is only fully defeated when every last idea behind it has been discredited and every last bloodline behind it has been wiped out.)

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy praised Dutch voters for their “responsibility”

How is it “responsible” to allow the PVV to get 13.1% of the vote? The turnout was 80.2% and the Dutch population is roughly 17.1 million, so that means roughly 1.8 million people voted for the PVV. Did you know that Israel had a population of <1.5 million in 1948? Even so it was able to win the Arab-Israeli War against Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Eypt, Jordan, and more opponents! And a few years later Israel had nukes! Please pause and think about that for a moment.

Only a few are not so dangerously deluded:

Defeated Labour leader Lodewijk Asscher agreed that “populism is not over”. The anger and insecurity of voters was reflected in the increased vote for Mr Wilders and the wider fragmentation of Dutch politics, he said.

Did Wilders fail?

In reality his party gained five seats and, as he pointed out, it is now the second biggest in parliament not the third.

This is a more realistic assessment. (Except, again, ”populism” is the wrong term for describing the PVV.)

Even one vote for the PVV is one vote too many. 1.8 million votes is atrocious and terrifying, and to describe such a result as a “defeat” for the PVV is insane. In even a minimally vigilant world, Wilders would have been assassinated long before such a result were possible. In even a marginally sane world (such as we had before the 9/11 Zionist false flag), the ideas espoused by the PVV would be considered too ludicrous for anything other than a stand-up-comedy routine. In even a vaguely reasonable world, democracy itself would not exist. In even a remotely heroic world, we would be willing to invade Israel despite the Samson Option, and similarly any other tribalist states (Myanmar, Hungary, etc.). In a truly fair world, all tribalists would be burning in eternal hellfire, as Jesus promised they would. We must never concede our vision for the sake of claiming false victories.

If you are in the Netherlands and hate Wilders, we would love to hear from you. Please comment below or better yet send in a contact form to volunteer for activism:


And if you see anyone saying that Muslims, or this or that ethnic group, are “not Dutch”, remember that the quickest way to shut them up is to show them this map:


In order not to end on too negative a note, it is my pleasure to introduce several new blogs.

Firstly we have Aryan Medicine, which at long last sets out on our long-proposed but hitherto untouched quest to develop a new theory of medicine (which, as many of you know, was something National Socialist Germany wanted to do due to its dissatisfaction with Western medicine, but never got round to doing):


However, the author of this blog has told me that he considers himself extremely underqualified for this undertaking, and requests guidance from others more knowledgeable in the field. So please do not hesitate to offer him advice and constructive criticism.

Next we have the Jamia Project:


which is what you have seen me bringing up in comments for a long time: the idea of removing Tanakh influence from the Koran. Saifullah started this blog, and he too needs whatever support you can offer, for there is much substantial work to do.

There is one more blog that I had been planning to announce but which is not quite ready yet, so maybe next time. Finally, I hope to see all other Aryanists who have privately promised to start their own projects doing so ASAP. As this post has shown, mainstream politicians do not have the mindset required – and we have always said that they aren’t and have never been seriously trying - to defeat those like Wilders who undeniably offer a strong vision for the future, unethical though its content may be. It is up to us to do so. A vision can only be defeated by a better vision. We surely have a better ideology, but an ideology only becomes a vision when it inspires people to work on its behalf. We need your help to make our ideology into a vision.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Dutch election 2017

  1. Hypnotix says:

    Since the author of Aryan Medicine said he wasn’t averse to help, please know that I can assist as an editor, if you want.

    The Jamia project is looking nice, I like it.

    Also, AS, I’m aware things have been pretty hectic as of late, but I wanted to know how far along you were with the scripts for the Aryan-Diffusion game. I’m not rushing you or anything, just asking.

  2. Saifullah says:


    Thanks, I started by writing a brief article about Ibrahim, Salih, Isma’il, regarding the issue of their quite opposing characters as prophets. I should find the actual reference in the books about the traditional connection between the prophet Salih and Hajar. It would add weight to the argument.

  3. AS says:


    “Ibrahim, Salih, Isma’il, regarding the issue of their quite opposing characters as prophets”

    I suggest either not calling Ibrahim a “prophet” at all, or calling him a “prophet of Yahweh”/”false prophet” for the sake of not confusing him with the true prophets.


    “Since the author of Aryan Medicine said he wasn’t averse to help, please know that I can assist as an editor, if you want.”

    Please talk to him over on his blog. The best way to get momentum going is to start a detailed discussion over there.

    “The Jamia project is looking nice, I like it.”

    You can probably already guess the broad idea:


    Basically, whoever appears in Column 1 must be removed from Column 3.

    Those who remain in Column 3 after this must also be removed if they (e.g. Luqman) display more qualitative similarity to Column 1 people.

    And of course Zoroaster from Column 4 will be added to Column 3.

    “I wanted to know how far along you were with the scripts for the Aryan-Diffusion game.”

    Sorry, I haven’t recently been able to get into the state of mind required to visualize prehistoric times. I will keep trying. In the meantime, please keep looking for an illustrator. As long as the script finishes before the drawings do, the overall release date is not delayed.

  4. Saifullah says:

    @AS – I refined the article, according to what you were saying, making things more clear and definite. making it clear that Ibrahim was a prophet of Yahweh, as opposed to Salih, a Prophet of Allah.

    “So the Message that Salih brought from Allah had a distinctive quality of universal compassion that the message of Yahweh that Ibrahim lived by was devoid of. One had no qualms to slaughter the fatted calf, whereas Salih protected the she-camel with threats of divine destruction.”

    I looked over that list, and probably one question I would have is that the Quran called Lut (Lot) a prophet, whereas the Torah doesn’t, but then the stories of Lut in the Quran are basically directly from the Torah and mostly relate to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.

    It will be interesting to look some into Zoroaster too actually…

  5. Hypnotix says:

    @ AS

    “Sorry, I haven’t recently been able to get into the state of mind required to visualize prehistoric times. I will keep trying.”

    No rush.

    “In the meantime, please keep looking for an illustrator.”

    The only one I had hoped would voluntarily do the work wasn’t willing, so I’ll have to either pay some professional to do it – which is surprisingly expensive – or I’ll have to do it myself.

    “As long as the script finishes before the drawings do, the overall release date is not delayed.”

    Indeed. By the looks of it, it’ll be quite some time before any drawings are ready, so you have that much more time. For better or for worse…

  6. AS says:

    In mildly positive news about the election, new party Denk won 3 seats:


    On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict the party advocates that Europe strengthens the international position of Palestine and that the Netherlands recognises Palestine as this would work better than a large number of interfaith dialogues.

    Weak, but better than nothing, I suppose. (And this just goes to show how right-leaning the Netherlands default is even without the PVV.) If not for Wilders moving the entire political spectrum even further right over the last decade, perhaps DENK would be bold enough to openly advocate ceasing to recognize Israel.



    “the stories of Lut in the Quran are basically directly from the Torah”

    You are correct. In the stories of Hud, Saleh and Shoaib is a consistent pattern of emphasis on free will:

    1) the prophet teaches
    2) each individual listener makes a free choice
    3) those who chose to reject the teaching are punished

    In Lut’s story, on the other hand, the archons had already planned beforehand precisely what would happen to whom, and everything that subsequently happens is just a “playing out” of pre-scripted events.

    (Not to mention that archons don’t appear at all in the other three stories!)

    Even if we had never read the Torah, we would know that Lut’s story could not have come from the same source as the other three stories.

    “It will be interesting to look some into Zoroaster too actually…”

    Actually I might have been overenthusiastic in my previous comment, for which I apologize. On second thoughts, it seems more appropriate to mention Zoroaster (also Mani etc.) on the side, but not to include him within the eventual Jamia text, as – let’s face it – we don’t really know for sure that he was in the original text. At most we can argue that Mohammed almost certainly knew about him, but this does not imply that Mohammed ever explicitly referred to him in public. And REVELATION, which is what the Koran is supposed to be, is by definition is not what Mohammed knew, but only the fraction of what he knew that he decided to REVEAL to a general audience.

  7. Numinous_Sun says:

    ‘Iran one of the most generous in hosting refugees and keeping borders open’:?UN

    While Iranians would bear the brunt of Donald Trump’s visa ban, which has been blocked on the orders of a US court, international officials say the country has quietly emerged as one of the most generous towards refugees.


  8. Hypnotix says:

    @ AS

    “Please talk to him over on his blog. The best way to get momentum going is to start a detailed discussion over there.”

    How do I contact him through the blog? I couldn’t find anything to that effect there. Do you mean through his Google+ profile?

  9. AS says:


    Aryanization in the UK as a whole too:


    Nick Griffin says he will move there in the next six months, which has left some people scratching their heads due to his negative views of immigration in the past.


    Since you have switched back to this username, does this mean you are ready to start activism again?


    “How do I contact him through the blog?”

    I meant you could post comments on Aryan Medicine and get a discussion going in public. One reason why many of our past allied blogs were abandoned after a few months was due to lack of discussion and failure to build a commenter community of its own. This discourages most bloggers except the most dedicated (e.g. Miecz) from continuing.

    But yes, Aryan Medicine also needs a contact form, and this is something you could certainly remind him about (I already suggested it to him once).

  10. Gallery Guy says:

    New to this site after researching Gnosticism and genuine anti-Zionism

    What I find most disturbing about this election is how most people I know, who proclaim to be against Zionism, have very little to say about the recent Dutch elections and are rather more concerned with more trivial issues like having their “human right” (yes, I know people who use that exact term) to smoke marijuana being taken away! (I’m a resident of New England myself by the way.)

  11. NuminousSun says:


    My activism never stopped and would continue even if you all were gone.

  12. AS says:

    @Gallery Guy

    “New to this site after researching Gnosticism and genuine anti-Zionism”


    “What I find most disturbing about this election is how most people I know, who proclaim to be against Zionism, have very little to say about the recent Dutch elections”

    What are your own thoughts about the election? Any good ideas on how to crush Wilders and the PVV?

    Wilders said Jordan should be renamed Palestine.[132] The Jordanian government responded saying Wilders’ speech was reminiscent of the Israeli right wing. His speech said “Jordan is Palestine. Changing its name to Palestine will end the conflict in the Middle East and provide the Palestinians with an alternate homeland.” He also said Israel deserves a special status in the Dutch government


    Still, even if the PVV is crushed, other similar parties will soon form to take its place so long as Islamophobia continues, just as in the UK we have seen Britain First, LibertyGB, etc. emerge in the wake of the BNP’s fall, showing that merely defeating the BNP was insufficient to solve the problem. Only definitively ending Islamophobia will restore politics to anything resembling sanity as we took for granted back in the pre-9/11 days.


    “My activism never stopped and would continue even if you all were gone.”

    I am relieved to hear this. Please provide a status update in relation to your priorities as outlined in this comment:


    I had previously assumed that your plan was on hold after you posted this comment:


  13. Gallery Guy says:

    Currently, I think the best thing citizens of the USA, such as myself, could do here is to keep chastising Wilders and his party and be politically active in general. If people are willing to move to the Netherlands and get politically active there, that’d be even better; but I’m interested in getting active here myself though. Any suggestions? I’m also looking to move out from New England to head out west in the near future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>