Please give Marshal Kim a well-deserved round of applause. For this alone North Korea deserves to have as many nukes as it needs, and hopefully to re-acquire South Korea in the near future. (Of course, the more serious reason is that North Korea is one of the very few non-Muslim countries that does not recognize Israel, sending the important message that anti-Zionism is not just an issue for Muslims but should be an issue for all non-Jews.)


By the way, what’s taking the Dotard’s impeachment so long?

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

245 Responses to #dotard

  1. Gallery Guy says:


    When it came to choosing people as his political associates, Hitler preferred artists and non-artists who had an artistic vision to them over anyone else. Bormann and Saur could have had an artistic vision, or seemingly appeared to have one.

  2. Gallery Guy says:


    Another reason why Hitler liked Himmler, despite the latter’s faults: Himmler was able to militaristically rally people more so than many other NSDAP-member did.

  3. Fatih Dion says:

    @Gallery Guy

    Hitler always kept his distance with Himmler even though he was a close friend of his, I read some of Hitler’s complaints against Himmler in David Irving’s book: Hitler’s War

    And in the book also explained if Martin Bormann as the entry of information from the generals to Hitler, also ever deceive Hitler

  4. Fatih Dion says:

    @Gallery Guy

    There is one thing I want to ask because I am curious, if many ethnic white are descendants of the Aryan race, why are they being more tribalist like Jews than other ethnicity (eg, colonization)?

  5. Gallery Guy says:


    Hitler and Himmler were never friends, and Bormann was a traitor: https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-89141-710-1

    We also need to realize that Hitler was a flawed individual due to the fact that he could have easily won the war at one point but screwed it up


    Most people with aryan ancestry today are selfish. Their ancestry is full of Aryans and non-Aryans.

  6. John Johnson says:

    “If Pythagoras is considered a noble element, then why are his teachings not being advocated on this site?”
    “Let’s make this simple: how does “Aryanism” advocate Pythagorean ideals?”

    If you simply wanted me to give you some examples of where Pythagoras is mentioned on this site, you could have asked more politely. (Or, you know, read our articles).

    “With racial mixing complete and societies stabilized into non-Aryan tradition, next came the struggle by individuals with Aryan blood memory to re-establish Aryan ideas among the ubiquitously low-quality populations of mixed blood. In Greece where the Pelasgian cults had merged into Hellenism, only a few peripheral Aryan sensibilities, such as despising the bow as a cowardly weapon and preferring hand-to-hand combat, remained in mainstream Greek consciousness. Then came the mathematician Pythagoras of Samos, who was rumoured to have been taught personally by Zoroaster (which, without speculating on Pythagoras’ time travel abilities, since Zoroaster predated him by many centuries, at least indicates that he was considered a worthy intellectual successor to Zoroaster). Combining mathematics with asceticism, Pythagoreanism taught universalist ethics based on universal spiritual connectedness, with the ultimate goal of destroying the wheel of birth inside which all souls were trapped. Among the Olympian pantheon it acknowledged only Athena (who was associated with highly esteemed number 7 in Pythagorean numerology), but in fact encouraged sun-worship (which some outsiders mistook for a cult of Apollo). Besides opposing democracy, the Pythagoreans condemned haruspicy and offered the superior alternative of pure numerological consultation without need for sacrifices. As Pythagoreans sought political power in Croton, Hellenic traditionalists surrounded and burned their headquarters with the Pythagoreans trapped inside.

    “For Pythagoras mathematics and numbers meant something else. They were living symbols of a spiritual mystery. Magic, Alchemy of Transmutation.” – Miguel Serrano

    “Aristoteles and Heraclitos referred to him derogatorily … Aristoteles said that Pythagoras’ fame was based on his appropriation of alien spiritual values. This was also the opinion of Heraclitos, who said that Pythagoras had woven together a false art and charlatanry from various writings. … We see that the Pythagorean cult can be traced back to pre Hellenic peoples.” – Alfred Rosenberg

    External link: Pythagoreanism

    Another mathematician, Plato of Athens, attempted to pick up by founding the Academy (complete with a shrine to Athena) promoting the autocratic ideology of Platonism and the ideal of a “philosopher-king”, in contrast to its rival Lyceum (complete with a shrine to Apollo) which promoted the democratic ideology of Aristotelianism. But Platonist low opinion towards emotions, in particular its insistence that emotions should be subservient to intellect, reflects its degeneration compared to its Pythagorean predecessor. For Plato, morality was something to be intellectually derived, in contrast to Pythagoras for whom morality was spontaneous and for whom the function of intellect was solely to optimize its representation within the limitations of language. Despite late attempts to bolster Platonism using Buddhism and Christianity, Aristotelianism won out. It did not help that Jews and crypto-Jews were settling Greece in large numbers via the Seleucid Empire, leaving Zionist agents well-positioned to fine-tune Judeo-Christianity and preclude rediscovery of the Gnostic original.”

    “Religions to be Revived

    Atenism, Manichaeism, Mohism, Pythagoreanism, Tlamatini, etc



    “At the risk of sounding redundant, I would like to bring up the subject of a certain Hans Jurgen Massaquoi. He alleges that he was mistreated and brutalized in the Reich because of his biracial status.”

    “And, contrary to lies by Zionist sellouts such as multiethnic Hans J. Massaquoi about mandatory sterilization for children of interethnic pairings, no attempt was ever made to sterilize Massaquoi himself. Similarly multiethnic Editha Horn was moreover able to have a successful acting career in National Socialist Germany. The term “Rhineland Bastards” (endlessly cited by Zionist historians as supposed evidence of “Nazi racism”) was not even introduced by National Socialist Germany, but was in fact coined and popularized during the Weimar Republic. And the sterilization campaign pertaining to them that is often blamed on National Socialist Germany was in fact a rogue local initiative of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (a private organization which was funded not by National Socalist Germany but by the US-based Rockefeller Foundation – can you figure out what is going on?), hence never spread beyond the Rhineland.

    Massaquoi (right) at an Aryan-only public park. Later he joined the Aryan-only Bramfeld Boxing Club. He also dated local girls, including the daughter of an SS Officer, without problems. After WWII, he became a Zionist author complaining about (mostly fictional) ”Nazi racism”. Massaquoi complains that he was not allowed to join the Hitler Youth, but similarly multiethnic Werner Egiomue could and did join, therefore this is no evidence of ethnic discrimination on the part of National Socialist Germany.”


    “I nevertheless propose we formulate an article that FULLY articukates all the tenets of National Socialism, not jusg the tenets in comparison to the false worldview of it.”


    @Fatih Dion

    “if many ethnic white are descendants of the Aryan race, why are they being more tribalist like Jews than other ethnicity (eg, colonization)?”

    Because such people have so little Aryan blood in them that it has no effect on their personality.

    But the reason why “white” tribalists seem to be more virulent than tribalists of other ethnicities, is because Western Civilization/”whites” in general have had more technology, power, and influence over the past 500 years. If India, or China, or Africa or anywhere else had the same level of technology and same proportion of Jews (e.g. people like Christopher Columbus, the Rothschilds, and Robert Oppenheimer all played decisive roles for Western Civilization) to influence the direction of society, you would be asking why these regions seem to produce more tribalists instead.

    This is why we place so much emphasis on destroying Western Civilization–while ignoble elements of non-Western cultures must also be replaced, the threat Western Civilization poses to the world is orders of magnitude larger.

  7. Gallery Guy says:


    “If you simply wanted me to give you some examples of where Pythagoras is mentioned on this site, you could have asked more politely. (Or, you know, read our articles).”

    Gerulf’s just an anti-Christian troll. Nothing that spectacular about him.

  8. Amaleq says:

    “In Phoenicia he (Pythagoras) conversed with the prophets who were the descendants of Moses the physiologist, and with many others, as well as the local heirophants . . . . After gaining all he could from the Phoenician Mysteries, he found that they had originated from the sacred rites of Egypt, forming as it were an Egyptian colony. . . . On the Phoenician coast under Mt. Carmel, where, in the Temple on the peak, Pythagoras for the most part had dwelt in solitude . . . Mount Carmel, which they knew to be more sacred than other mountains, and quite inaccessible to the vulgar…”(Life of Pythagoras by Iamblichus)

    Wasn’t much of Judaism stolen from the Phoenician and Egyptian mysteries, including many of the gnostic teachings that made it into the new testament of Eashoa Msheekah?

  9. Gallery Guy says:


    I’ve posted some of the main site’s advocacies for Pythagoras and his teachings, so why ask an unnecessary and improper question to JJ? My only guess for right now though: you’re a troll.

    I can work with indivuals who may be confused or unsure over certain topics (hell, I freely admit that I can work on on becoming smarter in certain topics relevant to anti-Zionism), but I can’t stand individuals who just repulsively and inconsiderately troll others out of pure incompetence or malice.

    And I also can’t stand individuals who are so quick to criticize (directly or indirectly) Christianity but won’t say anything about William Luther Pierce’s repulsive and socially inconsiderate behavior and mannerisms (such as perverting George Lincoln Rockwell’s overall message and writing and selling off the “Turner Diaries”), all while praising Pierce’s supposed religious messages and outwardly ignoring Hitler’s “anti-Christian” sayings as part of his larger anti-tribal attitude.

  10. Gallery Guy says:


    “Wasn’t much of Judaism stolen from the Phoenician and Egyptian mysteries, including many of the gnostic teachings that made it into the new testament of Eashoa Msheekah?”

    Well, Moses was of Egyptian origin, so it wouldn’t surprise me that he used Egyptian teachings for his advantage to create Judaism.

    Also, we can debate all we want about the existence of Jesus. We can even debate the existence of Alexander the Great. But the point is, is that many of the pagan “connections” with Jesus are, a lot of times, either exaggerations or just straight up lies. And what really works with the enemy: stating that Jesus absolutely never existed or that he did existed but certain aspects of his life and morals have been unfortunately made up?

  11. Gallery Guy says:


    “I had no reason to start a confrontation about Islam, which I am actually amiable towards. Hitler did not hope that Islam would have conquered Europe, he treated it as a lesser evil. “Without Christianity, we should not have had Islam. The Roman Empire, under Germanic influence…””

    Do I even need to put down all the pro-islam quotes by Hitler? Hitler endorsed Islam as a means to heroically destroy evil; and that quote by his doesn’t contradict that.

    Hell, Muhammad literally started his movement as a means to correct the teachings of Jesus themselves.

    “According to Linge, Himmler would have been more noble by this site’s standards than Hitler. He evidently valued the contributions of SS if he was going to disregard hereditary altogether.”

    No; Himmler did not have any artistic appreciation, allied himself with some of the worse people around who Hitler sacked, too ethnocentric in principle, not really a sincere leftist in general, and was ultimately a traitor due to his nature as a survivalist.


    At this point, it’s pointless to show how your specific statements are wrong, how they’ve already been debunked, and how you have contradicted them yourself. You’re literally just a troll who has signs of dementia.

  12. Amaleq says:


    Also, we can debate all we want about the existence of Jesus. We can even debate the existence of Alexander the Great. But the point is, is that many of the pagan “connections” with Jesus are, a lot of times, either exaggerations or just straight up lies. And what really works with the enemy: stating that Jesus absolutely never existed or that he did existed but certain aspects of his life and morals have been unfortunately made up?

    Interesting, then you may also find this quote by a supposed Rothschild of interest, and I’m surprised Gerulf hasn’t used it yet:

    “But I can tell you, you are self-deceivers. You lack either the self-knowledge
    or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the
    Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, we crucified Jesus but because we
    gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity
    but that we have imposed it upon you!

    Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of
    our proved historic offense. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow.
    Suppose we admit the charge. What of it? Compared with what Paul the Jew of
    Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is a mere street brawl.

    You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters
    and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what
    is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools,
    your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day??” — As written by Marcus Eli Ravage quoting a Rothschild, THE CENTURY MAGAZINE, JANUARY 1928, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 346-350.

    I don’t believe the Jews invented Jesus the Nazarene aka Eashoa Msheekah as this Rothschild seems to have believed….

  13. Amaleq says:

    “…The Church Father Epiphanius (writing in the 4th century CE) seems to make a distinction between two main groups within the Essenes: “Of those that came before his [Elxai, an Ossaean prophet] time and during it, the Ossaeans and the Nazarean.” Epiphanius describes each group as following:The Nazarean – they were Jews by nationality [JUDEANS BY NATIONALITY]– originally from Gileaditis, Bashanitis and the Transjordan… They acknowledged Moses and believed that he had received laws – not this law, however, but some other. And so, they were Jews who kept all the Jewish observances, but they would not offer sacrifice or eat meat. They considered it unlawful to eat meat or make sacrifices with it. They claim that these Books are fictions, and that none of these customs were instituted by the fathers. This was the difference between the Nazarean and the others…After this Nazarean sect in turn comes another closely connected with them, called the Ossaeans. These are Jews like the former… originally came from Nabataea, Ituraea, Moabitis and Arielis, the lands beyond the basin of what sacred scripture called the Salt Sea… Though it is different from the other six of these seven sects, it causes schism only by forbidding the books of Moses like the Nazarean. If it is correct to identify the community at Qumran with the Essenes (and that the community at Qumran are the authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls), then according to the Dead Sea Scrolls the Essenes’ community school was called “Yahad” (meaning “community”) in order to differentiate themselves from the rest of the Jews who are repeatedly labeled “The Breakers of the Covenant”…”


    So, which covenant to the Nazarean refer to if they do not accept the books of Moses?

  14. Amaleq says:

    I suppose I should add here for the likes of some of your detractors that a person need also at least acknowledge the books of Moses to be a Zionist or a Jew, because if they don’t, how then do they justify Zionist occupation of Palestine?

  15. Gallery Guy says:


    “I don’t believe the Jews invented Jesus the Nazarene aka Eashoa Msheekah as this Rothschild seems to have believed….”

    If anything, it would’ve been the Romans who invented Jesus; not the Jews.

    “So, which covenant to the Nazarean refer to if they do not accept the books of Moses?”

    Jesus rejected Moses. As for any other Essene, my preference are for those emulated Jesus’s life and morals, intentionally or unintentionally; and the most important being Jesus’s denouncement of procreation.

    Bonus fact,

    Jesus was a vegan by principle.

  16. Gallery Guy says:


    Might be random, but I look at Jesus and Bobby Fisher the same way this site looks at Schopenhauer and Nietzsche (a philosopher that Fischer admired) to a large extent.

  17. Fatih Dion says:


    Does anyone know why Hitler wants to make peace with Britain and respect their empire (colonial territory) during the war, when he wants to destroy the western civilization as a whole?

  18. Amaleq says:

    @Fatih Dion:

    Hitler attempted peace on all fronts many times, and was always rejected, he was not a warmonger. Hitler wanted to build Europe anew, not destroy it.

    Western Civilization is a concept more than it is a physical entity. I think this is were a lot of people get confused. In fact, the other name for Western Civilization is Judeo-Greco-Christian civilization. One does not need physical force to destroy an idea or concept. I also get the feeling many people do not understand that Western civilization is literally also known as JUDEO-GRECO-CHRISTIAN civilization by orthodox historians.

    It has been said, the fastest way to spread ideas is to drop bombs on them…

    If you’re a Westerner then you live in JUDEO culture! It amazes me that this fact refuses to stick on so many people….

  19. Gallery Guy says:


    Hitler had mixed views on Britain in general. He praised them for their practical effectiveness but hated most of everything else about them.

  20. @JJ

    “The term “Rhineland Bastards” (endlessly cited by Zionist historians as supposed evidence of “Nazi racism”) was not even introduced by National Socialist Germany, but was in fact coined and popularized during the Weimar Republic.”

    I JUST read an article about that.

    It seems I have a lot more reading to do on this site. Danke.

  21. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    @Christian Bethel


    In this video at 8:45, Goebbels talks about Germanic loyalty, note that it’s his last speech. Now I only thought Himmler was the only true Pan Germanic Nationalist, but what do you make of these comments made by Goebbels? And why Germanic loyalty?

  22. Gallery Guy says:


    You really got an endorsement of Pan-Germanism from Goebbels’ final speech to rally Germans against the invading soldiers from the Soviet Union? Give me a break!

  23. Gallery Guy says:


    Also, Hitler’s vision for Germany was anything but pro-European, so even any attempts at pan-Germanism by Hitler would be hell of a lot better than Himmler’s attempt at it.

    The term ‘Germany’ is incredibly broad in its etymology anyways.

  24. RP says:

    “In conjunction with what JJ posted about what Sanders was saying, I am starting to suspect that Zionists have an Iranian civil war somewhere down the pipeline. Having failed to coax the US into invading Iran, it would make sense for them to try getting Iranian useful idiots to start an Iranian Spring. With Sanders having floated the idea of allying with Iran against the Saudis, the US could easily end up allying with the Iranian rebels against the Saudis, since I am quite sure the anti-Islam Iranians dislike the Saudis much more than the pro-Islam Iranians dislike the Saudis. In other words, the US turning anti-Saudi does not guarantee it will end up on the correct side.”

    This is very accurate. Richard Spencer is associated with a man named Jason Reza Jorjani (Gentile) who is involved the “Iranian Renaissance” movement. This movement purportedly seeks to replace the Islamic theocracy with a Western style monarchy. Given the alt right’s islamophobia, it is clear that they do not support Iran for their resistance to Israel, but rather because of its ethnicity (Persian) who they see as being superior to Arabs due to their Eurocentric worldview, and also because Iran is supposedly fighting “ISIS” and “radical Sunni Islam”, which they view as an existential threat. The Zionists will clearly use this to their advantage by exploiting the Sunni-Shiite rivalry and Persian/Arab ethnic tensions to create a civil war.

  25. AS says:


    “(Persian) who they see as being superior to Arabs due to their Eurocentric worldview”

    Worse, right-wing Persians themselves have the same Eurocentric worldview. They would rather admit inferiority to “whites” just so they can claim superiority over Arabs according to the Eurocentric hierarchy. The most important thing to them is not even that they think of themselves as superior to Arabs, but that “whites” recognize them as superior to Arabs. This is the epitome of servility, and it’s not just a Persian thing either; the same psychological phenomenon is found among “non-white” rightists of all ethnicities. None of them even attempt to dispute Eurocentrism; all they want is to claim the No.2 spot (and, more importantly, have this claim accepted by “whites”) within the Eurocentric hierarchy, and the way they do this is by reinforcing “whites” as No.1 in particular ways that makes their own group No.2 by the same logic. I will never forget an indescribably Eurocentric HBD debate that I read many years ago between an Indian rightist and a Chinese rightist. The Indian rightist claimed that Indians were racially superior to Chinese because Indians were Caucasoids (some of whom even had lighter-coloured eyes), whereas the Chinese rightist claimed that Chinese were racially superior to Indians because north China is more similar in climate to Europe than north India (hence lighter-coloured skin). And neither of them had any awareness of how cringeworthily obsequious they both were. Then, just when I thought that their debate coudn’t possibly get any sicker, they started arguing about which of their ethnicities possessed a stronger “gut repulsion” towards “blacks”, and started sharing anecdotes about what their respective family members etc. thought about “blacks” as EVIDENCE of their respective ethnic group’s superiority. So I learned that, in the sick minds of “non-white” rightists, ostentatiously and viciously denigrating “blacks” is an actual technique that they use to make themselves appear “whiter” to observers. Since then I have seen many more “non-white” (including “black”) rightists on WN blogs/channels/etc. boasting about how much they despise “blacks”, in order to score approval from WNs…..

    This entire worldview needs destroying.

    (By the way, I look forward to your contribution. I understand that Hypnotix has lined up some stuff for you to do, so good luck!)

  26. @Fatih Dion says:


    “Hail Kim!”

    Why we must support North Korea that still under Communism? Support Kim Jong Un is like support David Duke

  27. Amaleq says:

    A quick little video I made for the Bolshevism of the Alt-Right:

  28. AS says:


    “North Korea that still under Communism?”


    “Socialism of Our Style” was “a man-centered Socialism,” explicitly making a break with basic Marxist–Leninist thought which argues that material forces are the driving force of historical progress, not people.[40] “Socialism of Our Style” was presented as an organic sociopolitical theory, using the language of Marxism–Leninism, saying:[41]

    The political and ideological might of the motive force of revolution is nothing but the power of single-hearted unity between the leader, the Party, and the masses. In our socialist society, the leader, the Party, and the masses throw in their lot with one another, forming a single socio-political organism. The consolidation of blood relations between the leader, the Party and the masses is guaranteed by the single ideology and united leadership.[41]

    “Great Leader” theory

    Unlike Marxism–Leninism, which considers material forces to be the driving force of historical progress (known as historical materialism), Juche in North Korea considers human beings in general to be the driving force in history.[42] It is summarized as “the popular masses are placed in the center of everything, and the leader is the center of the masses”.[42] Juche, North Korea’s government states, is a “man-centered ideology” in which the “man is the master of everything and decides everything”.[42] In contrast to Marxist–Leninist thought, in which people’s decisions are inextricably linked to their relations to the means of production (a concept referred to as “relations of production”), in Juche thought man is independent and decides everything.[42] Just like Marxist–Leninist thought, Juche believes history is law-governed, but that it is only man who drives progress: “the popular masses are the drivers of history”.[43] However, for the masses to be successful, they need a “Great Leader”.[43] Marxism–Leninism argues that the popular masses will lead (on the basis of their relation to production); in North Korea, the role of a Great Leader should be essential for leadership.[44] This theory allegedly helped Kim Il-sung establish a unitary, one-man rule over North Korea.[44]


    North Korea was admitted to the Non-aligned Movement in 1975 and began to present itself as a leader of the Third World.

  29. John Johnson says:

    The leader of the Third World speaks again:

    I wonder how False Left anti-Zionists will react to this:

    ““We, out of our external ideas of independence, peace and friendship, condemn strongly the U.S. action this time and express our firm support and solidarity with the Palestinians and other Arabian people in their just cause to regain their legitimate rights,” a North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesperson said, quoted in the state-controlled news agency KCNA.

    To Raba, the North Korean message was stronger and more convincing than that of Muslim leaders like Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdo?an.

    “[Kim] is not a Muslim, a Christian or an Arab, he’s not even in the Middle East, but he is supporting us,” said Raba. “There’s an Israeli embassy in Turkey, there’s a Turkish embassy in Israel; they have a relationship between them. As a Palestinian I don’t believe Erdo?an’s words.””

  30. Amaleq says:

    At-least we have one statesmen in the world with morals and intestinal fortitude, I guess….

  31. RP says:

    “Having failed to coax the US into invading Iran, it would make sense for them to try getting Iranian useful idiots to start an Iranian Spring”

    It seems to have already happened, although a tad bit too early:

    The U.S. has not turned anti Saudi yet, so people will still be skeptical of any “human rights” narrative spouted by the MSM with regards to Iran. Combined with the fact that Trump, an overt fanatic Zionist, is praising the protest himself, this will be doomed to fail.

    The question is; where will this go from here?

  32. Coyotl says:

    Has anyone encountered any good pro-NK propaganda or memes lately? I came across this video and wanted to share it:


    It realistically battles the paranoia regarding North Korean and dispels alot of the fear among people towards the regime nowadays. I think it’s worth spreading this kind of material, but I’m curious to know if any of you guys have seen anything recently.

  33. Coyotl says:


    I think one of the understated things of the current zeitgeist is that everything Trump hates forces (often liberal) contrarians to support them. This is resulting in support on a larger scale of radical groups like North Korea and anti-Zionist activists. I’m not saying this means it was okay for Trump to win, but we need to ride the wave of Trump hate to criticize every last one of his policies and draw the attention of the citizenry towards True Leftist platforms. Take this video:


    Not that creative of a meme, but it has 4 million views and portrays NK in a relateable light. Just imagine if the 157k likes in this video supported us! With a proper campaign we could literally have leftists defending an autocracy in a matter of years. From that point intentional communities are NOT out of the picture! There is so much potential in this current political climate I am shocked that nobody is discussing it here.

  34. Coyotl says:


    Another example. 2.4M views! 89 thousand likes. The same amount of trained individuals could make a huge difference in society. Just imagine if the people who are drawn towards this sort of content were energized by our platforms to the level that the Alt-Right is currently (or even moreso…) we would have swastikas in the streets. They have podcasts that are actually watched. They make actual hilarious memes and have twitter accounts with thousands of followers who are convicted of the opinion that their views are superior. Why do we not have similar platforms? It’s been long enough for this movement to take off seriously. I have seen posts from 2009, it’s almost been a decade since it was established. There are unwritten articles on the main site.

    We have to set long-term goals as a community. I have been shyly on the sidelines but I would like to become involved in the day-to-day activities that occur. I want to be a part of the team, if anyone is interested in my help simply email me.

  35. Lucius Rhine says:

    @Coyotl I’m assembling a press team if you’re interested.

  36. Coyotl says:

    Where can I contact you, Lucius?

  37. John Johnson says:

    What we have been saying all along, Trump is a demented dotard not a child:


  38. RP says:

    “The Kurds are even worse”
    The False Left narrative has changed from supporting rebels against “evil fascist Assad”, to supporting “secular Kurds” against “extremist” Turkey.

    As a result, Turkey is moving toward Eurasianism:

  39. Sun of the Isles says:


    “As a result, Turkey is moving toward Eurasianism”

    Not coincidentally, Turkey has strong Turanian influences. After all, the “Turkics” were nomads from Mongolia, who then migrated and settled in Anatolia and Central Asia:


    Pan-Turkism is basically Turanism:


    Of course, I do not assert that Turkey’s Aryan influences are weak either. After all, some of the world’s earliest farming cities were found in Anatolia:


    I think that Turkey needs to emphasise its Anatolian past and connect more with the Islamic world (or even the Balkans; I think that Turkey has, in terms of culture, more in common with the Greeks, Bulgarians, etc than the Central Asian countries), rather than with the Turanians and the so-called “Turkic world”.

    Of course, it was Mustafa Kemal (Jew) who distanced Turkey away from the Islamic world, and in doing so bringing up its Turkic identity up front (as well as masterminded the genocide and expulsion of the Greeks and Armenians in Anatolia, thereby turning a multiethnic country into a (almost) monoethnic one, making it more difficult for its inhabitants to take on a truly nationalistic national spirit, instead turning them on an ethnic identity).

    I even think that the name of the country itself is ethno-centric. The “Ottoman Empire” was a better name. Or “Anatolia”, which seems more fitting.

  40. RP says:

    “In other words, the US turning anti-Saudi does not guarantee it will end up on the correct side.”

    Jews are pushing democracy and secularism as the main arguments against Saudi Arabia. This is mainly put out as a relativist argument neocons (who insist that Iran’s government should be overthrown because it is undemocratic, and also that Iran allegedly sponsors terrorism).

  41. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    Off topic:

    The site says in the F.A.Q section that “The attempt by racist Wilhelm Frick in 1935 to “expand” the Nuremberg Laws to apply to other ethnic minorities resulted in his gradual removal from positions of authority from 1936 onwards. As a matter of fact, a circular was issued in 1936 to all NSDAP Gauleiters explicitly ordering employment protection of Germans of ethnic African ancestry to ensure the Nuremberg Laws would not be abused to discriminate against innocent people.”

    But Wilhelm Frick wasn’t removed from positions of authority? He was still in one of the most important governmental positions which oversaw the internal security and police (Reich Minister of the Interior) until 1943. And even then, to make things worse, he was replaced by another tribalist, Heinrich Himmler. And Frick was still appointed Protector of Bohemia and Moravia.

    And where can I find more information about this circular issued to Gauleiters?

  42. RP says:

    “So I learned that, in the sick minds of “non-white” rightists, ostentatiously and viciously denigrating “blacks” is an actual technique that they use to make themselves appear “whiter” to observers.”

    Such views are popular in the Incel/HBD community, with Elliot Rodger being an example. Many of those rightists subscribe to the view that “white” women are aesthetically superior, and that they need to “become White” in order to have success with those women.

  43. ItIsWhatItIs says:


    Not sure if any of you are familiar with the blogger and youtuber who goes by the name David Carroll? He raises many interesting points, especially in regards to the Judeo-Christian faith and its effects on American “blacks”. He also happens to be a eugenicist, although some of his ideas are a little skewed by Judeo-Christian civilization as far as I can tell. (I have not yet had the time to listen to everything he has had to say about this topic, nor have I actually had the time to go “down the rabbit-hole” with him, as he likes to call it).


  44. Robert Young says:

    This article’s existence current state is humorous, considering that Trump and Kim have a much more decent relationship now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>