Can 2018 start any worse?

If we had thought 2017 was bad (which indeed it was), unfortunately it’s looking like 2018 will be even worse.

1) Austria has fallen to Turandom:

The far-right Freedom Party has secured the key posts of foreign, interior and defence in Austria’s new coalition government for its nominees.

The opposition has expressed concern that the police and the security apparatus are now all firmly in the hands of the Freedom Party.

In recent years, the party has toned down some of its more extreme rhetoric. But many analysts believe that, in or out of government, it has helped set a right-wing agenda, not just in Austria – but in other countries across Europe as well.

When the far-right Freedom Party last entered a coalition in Austria in 2000, its fellow EU member states froze bilateral diplomatic relations in response.

They were lifted months later, and such measures are unlikely to happen again, as resurgent right-wing populist groups have been promoting anti-immigration and Eurosceptic agendas across much of the EU.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42379985

And the first thing this new government does is:

According to the new Austrian government’s work plans, they will give citizenship to the relatives of Austrian victims of the Holocaust.

The government’s work plan also added that Austria recognizes Israel as “a Jewish state” and supports Israel’s security interests. Before his appointment to the position of vice chancellor, he said that he will support moving the Austrian Embassy to Jerusalem

https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/1.830032

which, just like everything else, we had already warned about well ahead of time:

http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/ZC-FPO.jpg

but, just like on everything else, were ignored on. Regardless, Austria from now deserves to be treated no differently than V4, which hardly comes as a surprise considering Austro-Hungarian history. And by “treating no differently” I do not mean empty threats that V4 knows are empty threats and that Brussels knows V4 knows are empty threats (but will say anyway):

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/898023/poland-hungary-eu-migrant-quota-viktor-orban-ecj-commission-czech-republic

I mean all-out military invasion ASAP, Third-Reich-style. Nothing less has a realistic chance of defeating Turandom, mark my words.

2) Atlanteanism remains stuck in the cellar:

Democrats reneged on their promise, declining to fight for a DACA replacement in a year-end spending bill to avert a government shutdown — the only real opportunity they had to force the Republicans’ hand on the matter.

In the meantime, DACA recipients are losing their status, according to some estimates, by the hundreds every day; those who do can no longer legally work in the U.S. and are at constant risk of deportation.

The one serious proposal Republicans have put forward, the Secure Act, traded a weak DACA replacement (with no path to citizenship) for heavy investment in border security. It also called for a law that punishes sanctuary cities (which help protect immigrants from deportation), measures to allow ICE to detain immigrants indefinitely, and steep reductions to legal immigration. United We Dream called the bill a “white supremacist Trojan horse.”

The two likeliest scenarios, then, are a DACA replacement with major enforcement provisions, or no DACA replacement at all.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/vbyb3d/dreamers-dont-trust-democrats-to-fix-daca-in-2018

It’s been almost a year since Trump turned ICE loose on innocent Americans, yet not even one ICE agent has been shot dead so far, despite widespread firearm ownership in the US. (At least Palestinians fight back against the IDF driving them out of their homes, even though outmatched in weaponry.) If Americans had taken #FightICEwithfire seriously, things might be different. But they didn’t, so they aren’t.

I understand perfectly well that the Democrats are aiming at midterm elections, but if they are trying to be successful by compromising their positions, it is a worrying sign as it indicates a rightward shift of the entire political spectrum, as opposed to the healthier sign of the left pulling harder left in response to the right pulling harder right that I had hoped to see. The only thing Democrats could prudently compromise on is building the wall, because as I have said before, the wall even if built can be quite easily re-demolished later. On the other hand, it is much harder to regain the trust of people enough for them to want to re-immigrate to the US after having once connivingly stood by while they were subjected to the violence of deportation, so there should be absolutely no compromise on opposition to all deportations.

3) And, if the above were not already bad enough, now comes the rise of the useful idiots in Iran. Only a few days ago Ayatollah Khamenei was setting one of the last few remaining examples of positive autocracy in the 21st century:

‘Reagan was smarter than you, and he lost!’ Iran’s leader slams Trump, praises Black Lives Matter

U.S. police murder black women, men, & children for no justifiable reason, and the murderers are acquitted in U.S. courts. This is their judicial system! And they slam other countries’ and our country’s judicial system,” added Khamenei, ending the post with the hashtag #BLM – Black Lives Matter – to signal Iran’s support for the grassroots minority rights movement.

https://www.rt.com/news/414392-khamenei-trump-reagan-blm/

Then, as I predicted earlier:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/dotard/comment-page-1/#comment-176690

and as RP further elaborated on:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/dotard/comment-page-5/#comment-177697

the Zionist herding has promptly commenced to punish Khamenei:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/world/middleeast/iran-protests-rouhani.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1599154/Protesters-set-fire-picture-leader-Khamenei-Tehran.htm

and no prizes for guessing which side Trump is on:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-heats-feud-iran-021552260.html

Our message to the Iranian regime is simple. Do not be intimidated by Western opinion. Look what has happened within the last decade to Iraq, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia and others, because all of them failed in dealing with rioters with sufficient ruthlessness early on. Even China back in 1989, although successful in maintaining its regime, was nowhere near ruthless enough, which is why it continues to be plagued by pro-democracy movements to this day. It would be nice for Iran to set a better example of autocracy than China.

Our message to the Iranian rioters is equally simple. Don’t like the autocratic regime you are living under? Don’t riot, EMIGRATE FFS!!! Then you won’t have to pay taxes to the state whose policies you do not support, while those who do support the state can continue to do so, as they wish to.

And this goes back to why unrestricted migration is essential. There will never be societal peace so long as inhabitants of a country who dislike its regime try to overthrow it and replace it with their own (by which I include via democratic elections no less than via rioting), because then there will be other inhabitants who dislike this new regime and will by the same logic try to overthrow it and replace it with THEIR own, and so on, over and over (all the while wasting vast quantities of resources in one internal upheaval after another). No regime will be unanimously liked by those born in its territory, because no one chooses where they are born. But it is also wrong to demand anyone to support a regime they dislike. The incredibly simple solution is to keep the regimes in place*, and let people migrate without restriction to live under a regime of their own preference, whichever it may be. Every regime will thus, over time, be automatically matched up with its folk. It is not the duty of a regime to change itself so as to become popular with those who merely happen to have been born on its territory; rather its duty is to attract from around the world the kind of citizens compatible with its own ideals. (#MakeReplacementGreatAgain)

(* This applies to autocracies only. Democracies by their structure encourage regular replacement of one regime by another via elections, and thus are antithetical to folk-formation. The very form of democratic governance must first be eliminated worldwide.)

Those who initiate violence against those wishing to migrate, and thus who perpetually hold back this otherwise spontaneous process, are the problem. They are the ones against whom all war is automatically justified, and today more than ever needed, as (long overdue) retaliatory violence. Let this be the message going forward into 2018.

Happy New Year? In a more ethical future (hopefully one which we will manage to see within our lifetimes, and this will depend on the quality of our activism), perhaps, but not this year. For now, Western Civilization Must Die is all you are getting from me. Want to help make it happen? Send in a contact form:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

40 Responses to Can 2018 start any worse?

  1. John Johnson says:

    “(At least Palestinians fight back against the IDF driving them out of their homes, even though outmatched in weaponry.)”

    Also, don’t forget the #FightICEwithfire pre-1900s version:
    https://asly.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/picture-11.jpg

  2. Amaleq says:

    Currently American “red-pillers” and useful idiots are consumed by stories of “10,000 Troops being deployed world-wide with indictments for the Khazarian Mafia…” on the internet.

  3. Amaleq says:

    I also got in a debate today with a commentator on my minds.com page, a supposed native American who supports the Takfiris in Iran. He went on to tell me that he would be for building a wall around “commiefornia”, while simultaneously defending democracy…?

    I just don’t know sometimes…. Jesus!

  4. AS says:

    Our enemies have made a map showing the ongoing useful idiot herd stampede in Iran:

    http://gatesofvienna.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/iranianuprising2018.jpg

    This is NOT looking good at all…..

    The important lesson here is that you let one riot go uncrushed and other locations will understand that it is safe to replicate it. Now it will be even more difficult for the regime to re-establish order. This is just plain shoddy statesmanship from Iran, I’m afraid. Can you imagine North Korea letting something like this get so far out of hand?

    A mostly factually accurate enemy report (but dripping with Islamophobic spin) regarding the surface situation over there (of course omitting the Zionist herding behind the stampede):

    https://leohohmann.com/2018/01/03/iran-protests-not-just-about-economy-its-about-islamic-yoke-being-broken/

    Let us take this opportunity to refamiliarize with Khamenei’s exemplary foreign policy position (which is of course the real reason behind the stampede):

    Khamenei is an opponent of the State of Israel and Zionism, and has been criticized for anti-Semitic rhetoric and for making threats against Israel.[210] On 15 December 2000, Khamenei called Israel a “cancerous tumor of a state” that “should be removed from the region”[211][212][213][214] and in 2013 called Israel a “rabid dog”,[215] as well as in 2014 during the Gaza war,[216] for what he called attacking innocent people.[217] In 2014 a tweet, from an account attributed to Khamenei, claimed that there was no cure for Israel but its annihilation.[218][219][220][221]

    On 10 September 2015, in a speech about Israel after agreement on the nuclear program of Iran, Khamenei made a remark “Israel will not exist in 25 years”.[229] For the first time, the remark was published in Khamenei’s official website and his Twitter.[230][231] This sentence was introduced as the best and most important sentence made by Iranian people in 2015, in an online poll conducted by his official website.[232]

    On 21 February, at the 6th International Conference in Support of the Palestinian Intifada, Khamenei regarded withdrawal of Israel from south Lebanon in 2000 and from Gaza in 2005 as two major achievements so far.[233] Also, he advised the Islamic countries to refrain from “useless” crises and differences and instead concentrate on the issue of Palestine which he regarded as the core issue of Islam. “Otherwise, the potentials and capabilities of the nations will go to waste in the face of vain struggles, which would provide opportunities for the Zionist regime to become even stronger,” he added.[234]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei#Zionism_and_Israel

    @Amaleq

    Your linked site is not “interesting” (a copout adjective used by fence-sitters and bluffers, and which serious propagandists should avoid), it is LIBERTARIAN, one of our ideological enemies. If you want to critique the libertarian articles that you have linked to, then be our guest, and the more scathing you can be in your critique, the better. But please don’t just link to libertarian articles without accompanying critiques, and worse without even labelling them as libertarian, or else you could be misinterpreted as promoting them (unless you actually are?).

  5. CX says:

    https://www.rt.com/news/414655-iran-rallies-counter-protests/

    The riots against Iran is just more CIA infiltrated garbage. It is not very realistic to let people emigrate to any country they would like though. Governments do not oppose others governments simply because they disagree with each other. You are not going to get governments accepting groups of people just because they agree with a particular government.

  6. RP says:

    @AS
    Protesters chant: “We are Aryans! We don’t worship the Arab (God)”
    https://twitter.com/SGhasseminejad/status/946475151113183232/

    I am assuming by “Aryan”, they are referring to the Eurocentric definition,which classifies PIE derived linguistic groups such as Persian as “Aryan”. This explains their contempt for the “Arab” God, who they view as inferior. They apparently hold the view that “Persian” culture is superior, and that Islamic “Arab” culture is inferior.

    This Eurocentric and racist worldview is further supported by alt right academics such as Jason Reza Jorjani (Gentile), who claims that “Arabs” committed “white gencoide” against “Persians” and appropriated their culture. He also claims that the Islamic Golden Age is a myth, and that all civilization in the Middle East was built by the “Caucasian” Persians.

    https://angrywhitemen.org/2016/11/25/jason-reza-jorjani-arabs-committed-white-genocide-against-caucasian-iran-and-parasitically-appropriated-their-culture/

    It seems this racist and Islamophobic sentiment is shared among many of today’s youth in Iran, where there appears to be an “alt right” equivalent to the West, with many becoming “red pilled” on “race realism”, gender issues, etc.

    It appears demographics have shifted significantly to the right over the last decade, creating a population of disillusioned youth similar to today’s alt right, who are apathetic to anti Zionist causes such as Palestine, and are even outright criticizing Iran’s foreign policy for fighting Israel! Here they are explicitly chanting “Not Gaza, not Lebanon, my life for Iran”:
    https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/947855955236024325/

  7. Amaleq says:

    @AS:

    “Your linked site is not “interesting” (a copout adjective used by fence-sitters and bluffers, and which serious propagandists should avoid), it is LIBERTARIAN, one of our ideological enemies. If you want to critique the libertarian articles that you have linked to, then be our guest, and the more scathing you can be in your critique, the better. But please don’t just link to libertarian articles without accompanying critiques, and worse without even labelling them as libertarian, or else you could be misinterpreted as promoting them (unless you actually are?).”

    I found it interesting because I too believe that children should be allowed to learn at their own pace. I also found interesting that someone is willing to define themselves as radical and anti-utopian.

    “But please don’t just link to libertarian articles without accompanying critiques”

    Interesting. I would think it’s an Aryanists job to critique non-Aryanist literature on an Aryanist website.

  8. AS says:

    @RP

    “Protesters chant: “We are Aryans! We don’t worship the Arab (God)””

    Oh shit….. As if we didn’t have enough problems already…..

    “I am assuming by “Aryan”, they are referring to the Eurocentric definition,which classifies PIE derived linguistic groups such as Persian as “Aryan”.”

    Quite clearly so. (Though Spanish is also a PIE-derived language, yet the Eurocentrists don’t include Spanish-speaking Mexicans within the PIE-sphere. Certainly, Mexicans have partial non-PIE ancestry (e.g. Aztec) but so do Persians (e.g. Elamite) by the same token! What’s more, the Eurocentrists never talk about a need to prohibit Finns from reproducing with PIE-speakers despite Finnish language being non-PIE-derived! Everyone knows what this is really about!)

    “This explains their contempt for the “Arab” God, who they view as inferior. They apparently hold the view that “Persian” culture is superior, and that Islamic “Arab” culture is inferior.

    You are surely correct. Let me show you an excerpt of the contact form we received back in August 2017 from one of the useful idiot leaders:

    You have stated that antisemitism and anti-Islamophobia are a
    requirement which I somewhat do not believe in as an Iranian
    nationalism I consider Muslims more of a threat to Aryan culture than
    Jews considering both historical and modern rivalry and clashes
    between the Arabic and Aryan culture such as destruction of Aryan
    heritage by Islamic government of Iran or prosecution of nationalists
    and secularists and suppression and defilement of Aryan culture

    I responded:

    Firstly, we are not “anti-Semites”, we are anti-Jewish/anti-Judaic/anti-Zionist. We have nothing against speakers of Semitic languages.

    Secondly, “clashes between Arabic and Aryan culture” is a bad description. There are Aryan Arabs and non-Aryan Arabs, just as there are Aryan Persians and non-Aryan Persians. If possible, I recommend you read the entire Aryan Diffusion series, preferably in sequence, before replying, in order to avoid confusion over terminology.

    We support the post-1979 government of Iran on account of its anti-Zionism. This is not to say that it is perfect, but we would consider it extremely unwise to oppose it at this point in time, as overthrowing it could easily lead to a more Zionist-friendly regime replacing it. Whatever dissatisfaction you have with your government, I advise you to postpone criticism at least until we destroy Israel first.

    As for Iran and Islam, I hasten to remind you that Iran is arguably the most important Shia country. We support Shia over Sunni, and therefore support the continuation of an Iran that celebrates its Shia heritage. If Iran weakens its ties to Islam, the entire Shia community is weakened compared to the Sunni community. I advise an Iranian nationalism that appreciates the Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia from Sunni, and embraces Iran’s role as a present-day leader of the Shia community.

    I received no reply.

    “This Eurocentric and racist worldview is further supported by alt right academics such as Jason Reza Jorjani (Gentile), who claims that “Arabs” committed “white gencoide” against “Persians” and appropriated their culture. He also claims that the Islamic Golden Age is a myth, and that all civilization in the Middle East was built by the “Caucasian” Persians.”

    Perfectly described. They want so badly to be “white” that it is embarassing. (Also, where does the idea even come from that “Arabs” are not “Caucasians”? ) I deliberately included in Aryan Diffusion Part 4 the following excerpt:

    On the positive side, Iraj’s wife was said to have been a princess from Yemen, who might have therefore infused new (Puntian) Aryan blood into the Pishdadian royal bloodline.

    http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-4/

    Feridún had three sons. One of them was named Sílim, the other Túr, and the third Irij. When they had grown up, he called before him a learned person named Chundel, and said to him: “Go thou in quest of three daughters, born of the same father and mother, and adorned with every grace and accomplishment, that I may have my three sons married into one family.” Chundel departed accordingly, and travelled through many countries in fruitless search, till he came to the King of Yemen, whose name was Sarú, and found that he had three daughters of the character and qualifications required. He therefore delivered Feridún’s proposition to him, to which the King of Yemen agreed. Then Feridún sent his three sons to Yemen, and they married the three daughters of the king, who gave them splendid dowries in treasure and jewels. It is related that Feridún afterwards divided his empire among his sons. To Sílim he gave Rúm and Kháwer; to Túr, Túrán;[1] and to Irij, Irán or Persia. The sons then repaired to their respective kingdoms. Persia was a beautiful country, and the garden of spring, full of freshness and perfume; Túrán, on the contrary, was less cultivated, and the scene of perpetual broils and insurrections.

    https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Shah_Nameh/Ferid%C3%BAn_and_His_Three_Sons

    Anyone even remotely educated in mythology knows that Yemeni blood has been in Iran since the Pishdadian Dynasty! It goes without saying that Yemen is also the source of Mohammed’s own Aryan blood (come to think of it, could Saru and Saleh be the same person??????):

    http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-5/

    In this perspective, the Rashiduns (or at least Ali’s bloodline) were just latecoming Pishdadian in-laws! Iran becoming Shia is the fulfilment!

    But today’s Iranian youth know none of this. Here is another excerpt of that same contact form to give you some idea of their level of ignorance:

    expansion of bureaucracy
    and creation of state social services such as hospitals, insurance and
    retirement pension by Darius the great aside from his open advocation
    of Aryan culture, language and religions as stated by stone scriptures
    written by him during his reign.

    My response:

    Darius I was also a Zionist. He supported the construction of the Second Temple:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Temple

    Now looking back, I forgot to mention that insurance is a form of usury.

    “It seems this racist and Islamophobic sentiment is shared among many of today’s youth in Iran, where there appears to be an “alt right” equivalent to the West, with many becoming “red pilled” on “race realism”, gender issues, etc.”

    Exactly. Do you have countermeasures to propose?

    “It appears demographics have shifted significantly to the right over the last decade, creating a population of disillusioned youth similar to today’s alt right, who are apathetic to anti Zionist causes such as Palestine, and are even outright criticizing Iran’s foreign policy for fighting Israel! Here they are explicitly chanting “Not Gaza, not Lebanon, my life for Iran”:”

    Ugh. Compare with Khamenei’s position on Palestine and there can be no doubt which side is superior. (If you click on the link to that page, it is also mentioned that Khamenei is a fan of Uncle Tom’s Cabin! No wonder he is also a BLM supporter!)

    @Amaleq

    “I found it interesting because I too believe that children should be allowed to learn at their own pace. I also found interesting that someone is willing to define themselves as radical and anti-utopian.”

    This is how ideological confusion starts: when people start promoting other movements which use the same terminology also used by their own movement, but actually to refer to different and indeed oppositional ideas.

    Here is a test for you:

    1) Explain how their radicalism and anti-utopianism differs from ours.

    2) Explain how their ideas about treating children differ from ours.

    The answers to these two questions are what should have accompanied your original comments with your links. But the more important question is: whose versions of radicalism, anti-utopianism and treatment, theirs or ours, do you yourself side with?

    “Interesting.”

    This is starting to sound like an exchange that occurred in the past!

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-5/#comment-175499

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-5/#comment-175500

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-5/#comment-175502

    “I would think it’s an Aryanists job to critique non-Aryanist literature on an Aryanist website.”

    Just a few days ago you appeared to be at least an aspiring Aryanist:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/i-hate-how-accurate-my-predictions-are/comment-page-1/#comment-177976

    This is why I suggested that you critique the linked articles yourself. If you have since switched to libertarianism, however, please let me know and I will respond afresh.

  9. RP says:

    “Exactly. Do you have countermeasures to propose?”
    Emigration would be the first option. If Iranian youth desire Westernization, then let them immigrate to the West. Policies incentivizing immigration should be created. Unfortunately, Islamophobia in the U.S. and E.U. will make this hard to implement, as we have seen with the travel ban.

    The demographic problem is mainly due to the Iranian government’s decision to incentivize high birth rates during the Iran-Iraq war because of the large number of casualties. Since high population quantity correlates with low genetic quality, todays Iranian youth are only concerned with self interest (i.e. they are tribalists), and use Gentile-tier rhetoric of “non intervention” to argue against the regime’s foreign policy, which they say does not serve “their interests”.

    Meanwhile, we have spineless “leftist” Western leaders lecturing Iran about “human rights”:
    https://www.politico.eu/article/iran-protests-eu-urges-tehran-to-refrain-from-crackdown-on-demonstrators/

    “For the EU, human rights have always been a core issue in our relationship with Iran. Peaceful demonstration and freedom of expression are fundamental rights that apply to every country, and Iran is no exception,” Mogherini said in her statement.

    Will China take a stand and double down, unlike the West? Only time will tell:
    http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2126729/why-china-could-double-down-its-support-iran-despite-us

  10. Jaso Mueller says:

    I have to know, can I be a part of this movement. (?)

    I want to get a policy going politically for you here at Aryanism.

    I have a few ideas for a blog to give you, mainly information about black empowerment.

  11. Jaso Mueller says:

    This is my real e-mail, lower-case.

    Can I be a part of this website, is what I asked. I am a supporter of the PAL Territories, having worked for ASAL Technologies in Palestine.

  12. RP says:

    “A mostly factually accurate enemy report (but dripping with Islamophobic spin) regarding the surface situation over there (of course omitting the Zionist herding behind the stampede):

    https://leohohmann.com/2018/01/03/iran-protests-not-just-about-economy-its-about-islamic-yoke-being-broken/

    This report is the most accurate. False left outlets reporting about grievances with “economic issues” are misguiding the public with literal fake news. The protests are clearly Islamophobic, but false leftists don’t care because they want “democracy” and “secularism”.

  13. Juda den Tod says:

    Why emigration? Why let Jewish shills get away and make trouble from a safe place, where there are tons of shabbos goys to back them up? What these shabbos goys want is to destroy Iran! They are demanding that the Iranian government surrender it sovereignty and power! And what would that accomplish? The elimination of a massive block in the path of the Zionist nonentity! And what is this called? Treason!

    The penalty for treason should be death, or prolonged torment. Someone who is dissatisfied could be allowed to leave, but when one commits treason, they must be punished.

  14. Would anyone be willing to help me with a movement in Britain?

  15. John Johnson says:

    @Jaso

    Welcome!

    Please send in a contact form with your ideas if you haven’t already:

    http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

  16. Jaso Mueller says:

    Just to say, again…

    Are you tired of Israeli Organissations taking precedence over Palestinian Animal Welfare Rights?

    Under Apartheid, Palestine is known as the broken-down beagle (dog) of the Middle East.

    The Palestinian Animal League is the only animal advocacy group in the Palestinian Occupied Territories.

    That’s how poor Israel treats Palestine…

  17. Jaso Mueller says:

    @Grupps (Gruppenfuhrer)

    Are you tired of Palestine having a non-entity regarding Animal Rights compared to Israel?

    I am willing to help out in Great Britain regarding animal rights in Palestinian Territories.

  18. Amaleq says:

    The French Origins of “You Will Not Replace Us”

    “Not only do thinkers like Guillaume Faye admire Vladimir Putin as an emblem of proudly heterosexual white masculinity; they fantasize that Russian military might will help create a “Eurosiberian” federation of white ethno-states.”

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/04/the-french-origins-of-you-will-not-replace-us?mbid=social_twitter

  19. AS says:

    @Jaso

    “Are you tired of Palestine having a non-entity regarding Animal Rights compared to Israel?”

    I’m not sure what you mean, but we do not believe in “rights”, so no. In terms of actual scale of cruelty towards animals, though, Israel is far worse than Palestine.

    Annual meat consumption per capita: Israel 96.0kg vs Palestine 21.3kg (world average 41.9kg)

    http://chartsbin.com/view/12730

    Annual dairy consumption per capita: Israel 178.33kg vs Palestine 49.17kg (world average 108kg)

    http://chartsbin.com/view/1491

    Palestine is not only nowhere near as bad as Israel, but indeed not even half as bad as the world average! (I am quite sure even without data that Israel also uses many more animals for experimentation than Palestine…..)

  20. Yes I’d love and appreciate all the help I could get thanks.

  21. AS says:

    Yep, 2018 will be worse than a disaster movie.

    Trump continues to dismember Atlantis on multiple fronts (note that El Salvador, Nicaragua and Haiti are all countries which have officially recognized Palestine):

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-to-end-provisional-residency-for-200000-salvadorans/2018/01/08/badfde90-f481-11e7-beb6-c8d48830c54d_story.html

    Again, my solution is simple: 200000 people could easily become 200000 AR-15s and 200 million 5.56 rounds ready to #FightICEwithfire, whereupon would ICE be prepared to take the death toll required to achieve a bully’s pleasure of throwing innocent people out of their homes?

    Until my solution is adopted, Jews will just continue to encourage Trump to keep doing what he’s doing:

    https://www.jta.org/2018/01/08/news-opinion/united-states/ronald-lauder-praises-trump-as-man-of-incredible-insight-and-intelligence

    Meanwhile, Orban now wants to expand Turandom into former East Germany (which our enemies of course celebrate):

    http://gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/viktor-orban-in-bavaria-2018-will-be-the-year-in-which-the-will-of-the-people-is-restored/

    http://gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/viktor-orban-we-do-not-view-these-people-as-muslim-refugees-we-view-them-as-islamic-invaders/

    It’s not just V4 anymore; this is what happens when you give Turandom breathing space:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Seas_Initiative

    which is even worse than the old one:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Huns450.png

    Only Scotland still resembles what the EU as a whole used to be like before the rise of Turandom:

    http://metro.co.uk/2018/01/06/scotland-considers-giving-refugees-and-asylum-seekers-the-right-to-vote-7209374/

    Of course the correct solution is not to give refugees the vote but to end voting altogether (because only an unelected leader can protect refugees in the event that the majority turns against them, which is the event that needs to be prepared for by all serious pro-refugee activists), but at least Scotland has good intentions.

    Giving refugees firearms and training, or better yet demanding their immediate enlistment into military service in exchange for citizenship, would be far more practical.

  22. Jaso Mueller says:

    @ AS

    There are many times that Israel has shot and killed Palestine’s Canine Population. Not fair.

    How many times do I need to be reminded how much richer Israel is?

    They are not able to discern whether Israel has too much control over Palestine, the ones used for consumption of meat and dairy products in Israel, the animals.

    So, the animals do not know what they are serving, that they are serving wealth.

  23. RP says:

    @AS
    Our enemies have some very interesting thoughts regarding the Turandom phenomenon:

    https://dailystormer.red/there-will-soon-be-no-jews-in-france/
    The first part of the article describes how many Islamic societies in the past have had “white looking” leaders, how “white” genetics will rise to the top in a hypothetical Islamic Europe, and that therefore Islamificiation will not lead to “white genocide” after all. Anglin points to several leaders such as Assad to prove his point.

    Some noteworthy paragraphs:

    “Obviously, we have to fight the Islamization of Europe, as it will destroy so much of our culture and heritage. But it will not destroy the white race. And it absolutely will destroy Jews.

    Bibi Netanyahu has recently gotten into a huge spat with George Soros, and I wonder if he hasn’t figured this out. He has been aligning with Eastern Europeans who are against Islamic immigration.

    The Jews are basically a hive-mind, their cohesiveness based on instinct and impulse rather than a clear agenda. But Bibi is smarter. He is a high-competence Jew with a clear agenda for his people. And it is not nothing that he is currently acting out against the European liberal order. Of course, there is also the fact that the European liberal order is opposed to the basic war agenda of Israel, and becoming more so. So it’s possible he isn’t foreseeing the long-term picture of just what Europe will look like in 50 years if it is conquered by Islam. I can’t read the guy’s mind.”

    The observations are astoundingly accurate. It is true that Jews like Soros are simply acting out of neurotic hive minded impulse, while more calculating Jews like Netanyahu have predicted the backlash and are using it to their advantage.


    “Of course, most of the establishment is refusing to accept the basic fact of a future Islamic Europe. Part of that is because they don’t want the people to know that is coming, but part of it also appears to be that what passes for the intellectual elite in current year is incapable of accepting it themselves. They are holding on to the dream that Arabs and other Moslems will convert to their humanist-atheist system, even while there is zero indication this will happen.”

    This is also true.The intellectual talking points put out by Jewish controlled False Left academia is self destructive -they try to justify immigration on the basis that immigrants can be converted to accept humanism and secularism, when the immigrants are clearly Muslims.

    He concludes with this:

    “The question of what an Islamic Europe will look like, however, should start coming up in the think-tank circles soon. And I eagerly await their take on things”

    This should be our job. The intellectual failures of the Just Left, which promotes contradictory narratives of Islam and secularism, anti Islamophobia and
    philo Semitism, and humanism, etc. have no doubt been engineered to create backlash.

    The takeaway from Anglin’s article is that he is essentially admitting that the backlash from him and other Gentiles was the plan all along. But he won’t concede defeat; he will still continue with his barbaric antics.

  24. Jaso Mueller says:

    Bibi has to be smarter about where he points in Palestine. There is a total population of 2,000 Palestinian Mountain Gazelles only, where there used to be more, and he is hurting the flora and fauna in Palestine.

  25. Lucius Rhine says:

    @RP

    The Right has always been better at making accurate observations than the left, because the false left was engineered to be weaker than the Right – this includes when it comes to intellect. Many false leftists abandon their intellect, as is apparent in Marxist ideology. Marxism only accomplishes it’s mission with the help of Useful Idiots (False Left) while the intellectual Marxists (Rightists) set up the basis for a controlled system of thought conducive to a tyrannical democracy built to serve them.

  26. AS says:

    @RP

    “The observations are astoundingly accurate. It is true that Jews like Soros are simply acting out of neurotic hive minded impulse, while more calculating Jews like Netanyahu have predicted the backlash and are using it to their advantage.”

    I strongly disagree. I believe that Soros and Netanyahu are just doing the Seal of Solomon:

    http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-4/

    I know Soros is insincere in his supposed pro-refugee activism because if he were sincere he could have easily been more competent about it. Soros is being melodramatically incompetent on purpose, so that even rightists can “spot” him. His supposed feud with Netanyahu is just to make his activism even more eye-catching now that they are trying full-tilt to mainstream the backlash. What Soros is really doing is letting refugees into the EU….. to be slaughtered one day in a scaled up version of Srebrenica.

    Belief in the following:

    The Jews are basically a hive-mind, their cohesiveness based on instinct and impulse rather than a clear agenda.

    is what I expect from Anglin fans (who are the lowest of the low even within the Alt-Right!), but not from serious anti-Zionists.

    “This is also true.”

    I disagree with this also. The Muslim demographic is in reality not increasing nearly as fast as Islamophobic blogs are trying to scare their readers into believing it is:

    http://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

    a “high” migration scenario projects the record flow of refugees into Europe between 2014 and 2016 to continue indefinitely into the future with the same religious composition (i.e., mostly made up of Muslims) in addition to the typical annual flow of regular migrants. In this scenario, Muslims could make up 14% of Europe’s population by 2050

    Even this highest estimate is ABYSMALLY LOW, and the % in reality is likely to be even lower:

    The refugee flows of the last few years, however, are extremely high compared with the historical average in recent decades, and already have begun to decline as the European Union and many of its member states have made policy changes aimed at limiting refugee flows

    The first time I read this report, I became depressed! The notion that Islamization is a done demographic deal is hopelessly optimistic.

    As for Muslims abandoning Islam, it is happening every day, in EU countries merely less ostentatiously than in places like Iran. Those who remain nominally Muslim but who do not practice are also on the rise (look at those who drink alcohol, for example). Anglin fans underestimate the fragility of Islam because they believe in Anglin’s monolithic and ludicrous “haji” stereotype of Muslims rather than what Muslims are in reality: INDIVIDUALS, just like everyone else! I, on the other hand, often find myself in the unenviable position of having to offer spiritual support to Muslim individuals who are struggling with their faith, so I had always known that this was going to be a problem within the Muslim community. I used to hope that existing Muslims leaving would be more than compensated for by new Muslim converts, but this is unlikely to happen given the current climate of Islamophobia. So the problem is even worse than my own former estimation of it…..

    Our best hope now (besides Turkey joining the EU) is for mass emigration of Islamophobic non-Muslims from non-Turandom EU countries into Turandom (or elsewhere). We should consider ourselves lucky if just Britain and France can be Islamized in this way. Then at least we get a few more nuclear-armed states on the anti-Zionist side (currently all we have are North Korea and Pakistan FFS!). With this in mind, I would even prefer internal EU migration of Muslims from geopolitcally insignificant countries such as Sweden into more important countries such as Britain or France.

    “The takeaway from Anglin’s article is that he is essentially admitting that the backlash from him and other Gentiles was the plan all along. But he won’t concede defeat; he will still continue with his barbaric antics.”

    Yes, because (as we have pointed out from the beginning) they are not in this fight to OPPOSE Jewish interests, they are in it to ADVANCE “white” interests. So all Jews have to do is trivially arrange it so that “white” interests coincide with Jewish interests (as with Turandom), and then they can sit back and let their herd do the rest. Zionism will never be truly threatened except by an ideology of PURE OPPOSITION, such as ours.

  27. Coyotl says:

    Hi again.

    I’ve taken the liberty of uploading my personal Alt-Right folder as a ZIP file for the movements use. It’s small at the moment but there are some gems in there. Use for entertainment or propaganda purposes.

    http://www.mediafire.com/file/796r9v71yzwc4wb/Altards_1.0.rar

    I will continue to update and spread it in the future as part of my ultimate desire to help shift internet culture away from the grip the Alt-Right currently has on it. I don’t think we will make any progress in a militant sense until sufficient propaganda inspires our people to action, and all relevant propaganda these days is pretty much on the internet.

  28. Ganbaru says:

    I agree with what AS said about the Zionist agenda, although it can be confusing when you just look at their actions and what they say, but I also think it would be beneficial to always expect the worst from the enemy and not underestimate them by thinking they are disorganized or acting without a plan. When I hear a Jew speak, I never try to make any sense out of what they are saying or start to think they are genuine, I only ask myself how what he says can be beneficial to the Zionist agenda. Nethanyahu’s retarded son is also way too flashy on social media with his Soros tweets, (Sorry if that’s a repost. Also, great job to him for getting Duke’s support)

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.811374

  29. Sadhaka says:

    This is my first comment. In the last 15 days I read the entire Aryanism site, many of the recent blog articles and many of the comments, including all the comments underneath the “Could 2018 start any worse” post. I also had a look at some of the related pages (True Left etc.).

    In the two preceding years, I’ve studied all the various White Nationalist and Alt-Right sources. Before that also some of the Counter-Jihad. And still further back in time I was actually an enthusiastic anti-racist, favoring meritocracy over democracy, and many of the principles found on the Aryanism site.

    Fifteen days of reading your sites isn’t that much though. I’ve still got much to learn and unlearn.

    I’m Dutch, 42 years old, and I would like to hear your response to the following.

    Long ago (1981-2001), before I ever heard a politician or author speak on these matters, I experienced the Moroccan and Turkish children, teenagers and adults around me as extremely tribal. Although I became friends with non-Islamic Indonesians and people of other ethnicities, that never happened with the Muslim classmates. Those kids, who kept to themselves, spoke Arabic with each other, and during the holidays they’d go to the countries of their parents. They had their own tribe. It was the same for the girls. One of those girls got married when she was 12, which was shocking to all of us (including that girl, who cried profusely when she heard the news).

    Later on in my life (1995, in Amsterdam) I went to a library and outside a couple of kids made jokes about me, which I didn’t understand. When I came out of the library, my bicycle was trashed. One day while walking through Utrecht, TWO separate groups of Moroccans deliberaty bumped their shoulders against mine (even though I was just minding my own business, listening to music on my headphones). In other words: several personal experiences which gave me the impression that they targeted ME because I’m visibly “White”. I was not in any way racist (many of my friends, crushes, pop idols and gurus had been non-White), but those Moroccans clearly were.

    In 1998 my Polish wife was being followed through Antwerpen by an Arab man, until after many minutes and many turns she rang a random doorbell to get inside somewhere, calling me for help. Around the same time I met a Belgian guy who had first converted to Islam but then became an apostate (because he took an interest in Hinduism), resulting in him receiving numerous death threats. And this was in a period in which I was associating with hundreds of people from all over the world, with not a shred of racism in my awareness.

    In 1999 my wife and I were living in Amsterdam and the local newspaper reported on the constant vandalism and harassment, by (mostly Moroccan) immigrant children and teens, in the various swimming pools. We had Moroccan neighbors who were very friendly to us, but regularly the man was shouting very loudly at his wife and sometimes we could hear banging noises too, indicating physical violence.

    All of this was prior to the phenomenon of terrorism, or politicians like Geert Wilders, or anti-Islam blogs. It was also prior to the Rotherham grooming scandal, and the rise of acid attacks, and random Europeans being stabbed or beheaded in trains and shops. All of that came ON TOP of my 20 years of negative personal experiences.

    So you see, I’m having some disagreement with being labelled Islamophobic (“irrationally fearful of Islam”). And although I admittedly went through a racist phase, especially in the last two years, I did not start my life as a racist. On the contrary!

    And I know that what I have described above is very similar to what other Europeans have experienced, and still experience on a regular basis. This is not simply an issue of tribalist genetics. Otherwise, how can it be that so many kindhearted people dislike Muslims but have no problems whatsoever associating with immigrants from other parts of the world? And sure, not every Muslim in my life has been violent towards me, and I’ve also encountered plenty of Dutch and African criminals and arseholes, but all in all it’s mostly been Muslims and their children.

    I have read passages on the Aryanism site that were positive about the phenomenon of no-go zones, but from my perspective those are tribal areas. Muslims may be theoretically universalist, but in practice (and in general) their attitude towards the kuffar is still very tribal. Racist even. Individual attacks are almost always aimed at “Whites”.

    For people who were born and raised in such areas, and who don’t have the financial means to move out, the rapid change into no-go zone has been hellish. Shouldn’t we be compassionate towards those people too? When all of a sudden they are being confronted with amplified calls to prayer, against their wishes, and can’t walk around with their pets anymore, or need to be escorted by a man at all times, isn’t that violent too?

    There are also passages on the Aryanism site taking the side of the Moors, even though between 711 and 791 AD they demanded a yearly tribute of 100 virgin girls (i.e. a total of about 8,000 innocent children, and more if Isabella and Ferdinand had not ended it), to be abused in their harems, not to mention that the Moors were good friends with the Jews. Similarly the Ottoman Empire (and their Jewish accomplices) demanded a tribute of boys from the various Balkan countries, to be forcibly converted to Islam and then serve as Janissaries. Not to mention the Barbary pirates who kidnapped and enslaved thousands of men, women and children from the coastal areas of Europe (including the Netherlands). If we’re going to be frank about colonialism, shouldn’t we be frank about those abuses too?

    People living in Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary etc. tend to be quite aware of this history, which explains, at least in part, their violent hostility towards Muslim immigrants.

    India too has had its share of Islamic violence (with many of its temples smashed and desecrated), centuries before Israel was created. When the Taliban blew up the Buddhas of Bamiyan, that was nothing new to me. I had read about similar incidents in the 15th century Caitanya-caritamrta. ISIS destroying monuments and statues in Syria wasn’t out of character too.

    I’m of the opinion that Israel did 9/11, but I do not believe ALL the European, American and Australian terror attacks were set up by the Mossad. Many of them were unquestionably carried out by Muslims, either independently or organized by an Islamic cell. You condemn the Alt-Right for being Useful Idiots, but I have not come across a single statement condemning these Muslims as Useful Idiots, even though their violence, aimed at civilians, is the primary cause of “Islamophobia”. And because the increase in the number of Muslims has been accompanied by an increase in the number of violent (sex) crimes and terror attacks (some of them unimaginably brutal), again, the accusation of “Islamophobia” isn’t really fair. It’s perfectly understandable that people are fearful of further Islamization.

    It’s not an irrational fear. Just as anti-Zionist is a more accurate term than anti-Semitic, so anti-Islamic is more appropriate than Islamophobic.

    For this same reason I do not believe we should physically attack far-right groups like PEGIDA (except individuals who have crossed the line). First of all, not all of them are setting fire to refugee centers (indeed, if I’m not mistaken, most of the fires are started by refugees themselves), and second, these people (many of them parents and grandparents) are motivated by reasonable concerns for themselves and their loved ones. Why be compassionate towards the immigrants but not towards the people who keep hearing about children and the elderly being robbed, raped, assaulted, stabbed, doused with acid etc.?

    And the problem isn’t just the dedicated jihadists/salafists. It’s also very common for Muslim immigrants to lose their temper in hospitals, screaming at or physically attacking nurses and surgeons. In the no-go zones, ambulance personnel and firefighters routinely get pelted with rocks and heavy fireworks. Such increasingly common incidents are not the work of Mossad or Farage. As I pointed out above, such behavior was already going on in the 1980s, just on a smaller scale and with less bloodshed.

    I agree that SOME of the PEGIDA and other far-right protesters are going too far with their pig blood etc., but shouldn’t we treat members of those groups as individuals too? Certainly not all of them are vile racists. Indeed, many of them were very open to immigrants until the influx became too massive and too uncontrolled (consider the very dangerous situation on the highway near Calais). This is why those groups have grown exponentially in the last five years. Many of those who were in the “refugees welcome” camp five years ago, are now part of the far-right.

    (As a side issue, I’d like to mention the following. Although meat consumption is higher in the West, the public slaughtering of animals is much more normalized in Islamic countries. Many Muslim immigrants have seen or even participated in religious festivals involving the cutting of throats. It is well known that many mass murderers tortured animals in their childhood. Could it be that festivals like Eid al-adha desensitize children to gruesome bloodshed, while Western children, though eating more flesh, retain their empathy for other living creatures? Sure, one could accuse Western people of being hypocrites because the butchering of animals is done out of sight and out of mind, but there’s no question that those same Western people, who favor the stunning of animals prior to them being butchered, could never get themselves to cut the throat of an animal, much less another human being. If they really have to, they invent automatons like the guillotine to make it as painless as possible.)

    I don’t know how succesful you’ve been with recruiting Europeans, but if it’s been minimal, please take the above into consideration. For my own activism, I’m gonna have to harmonize the Aryanism approach (i.e. encourage anti-Zionism, discourage tribalism) with my understanding of what the migrant crisis has been like for the people who were born here 30, 40 or 50 years ago. Simply calling them racists and Islamophobes is not going to work. I sure can’t do that with a straight face. I feel for these people because I know exactly what they’ve been through. Not that I don’t feel for genuine refugees. I feel for them too. But not all immigrants are refugees, and not all refugees are noble. Many of them are dangerous, and I’d rather keep them at a safe distance. And just because they are anti-Zionist (often very superficially), and kind of like Adolf Hitler (also superficially), doesn’t mean their background and nature are compatible with Germanic National-Socialism. There’s quite a difference between having a few hundred thousand allied soldiers, who you know are going to eventually return home, and MILLIONS of Muslims and Africans coming to Europe to settle permanently.

    What do you think? Any feedback would be appreciated.

  30. Gerulf says:

    @Sadhaka If you’re really European, you should be cautious. This site is predisposed towards gnosticism and is constructed on a mishmash of post-WW2 “esoteric” interpretations of National Socialism. In other words, a flimsy foundation. So despite the fact that it points out a lot of things that the white nationalists, Alt-Right subversives, Christian reactionaries, right-wingers, etc. miss and even comprehends some of the ideals (such as the fact that Jesus and Mohammed were against the Jews and that the nobler non-Jewish religions of antiquity were on the same side), it’s badly in need of an overhaul.

    While I myself am favorably disposed towards Islam, I have not overlooked it’s unfortunate merger with Judaism. Like Paul before him, Mohammed compromised the truth for the lie; in his case, he wanted to win over the Arabs who had been proselytized to Judaism/Christianity so he identified Abraham’s deity with his own, infinitely more pious, conception.

    If his last sermon is authentic (which says that all men came from Adam and Eve, the same babble as Acts 17:26), then people should be wary about using Mohammed for the cause. I am convinced that it is an invention. After all, much of Islam is founded on hearsay and rumours.

    Contact me at deowulfxyz@gmail.com if you’re interested in hearing me out.

  31. Fatih Dion says:

    @Sadhaka

    I want to help the admin to answer the question

    “Muslims may be theoretically universalist, but in practice (and in general) their attitude towards the kuffar is still very tribal. Racist even. Individual attacks are almost always aimed at “Whites”.”

    Immigrants / refugees and indigenous people, or anyone who commits acts of violence should be punished severely (if it can use the death penalty), then the crime will be reduced rapidly, Do not just blame the strangers, blame your government too, I feel doubt if you read the content on this website carefully and seriously, please read this content again :

    How to solve immigration problem

    http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/immigration/

    The best form of government to handle multi-ethnic society

    http://aryanism.net/politics/government/

    And their tribalist attitude is not from his religion, but the habit of living in his former country, and you need to see the country with the largest Muslim population, Indonesia, which can unite with the many different ethnic, local languages, and religious differences that European countries will experience it in the next few years

    “And just because they are anti-Zionist (often very superficially), and kind of like Adolf Hitler (also superficially), doesn’t mean their background and nature are compatible with Germanic National-Socialism. ”

    Are you sure that you understand the difference between reality of what National Socialism and Nazism? You say if you have been reading the content of this website for 15 days, even read every comment discussed in this website’s blog, You should not have questioned the problem again

    Please read carefully this content

    http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-nazism/

    The right-wing people with their vain energy tried to tell us that the National Socialists were a movement for “white people”, and also oppose immigration from “Third World” countries, but we debunk them many times until we run out of time to recorrecting all leftist movement so our stealthy plan will complete

    “MILLIONS of Muslims and Africans coming to Europe to settle permanently.”

    “The importance of the individual states in the future will no longer lie in their political or statal power. I look to them rather as important ethnical and cultural centres. But even in this respect time will do its levelling work. Modern travelling facilities shuffle people among one another in such a way that tribal boundaries will fade out and even the cultural picture will gradually become more of a uniform pattern.” – Adolf Hitler

    “The German army does not exist for the purpose of being a school in which tribal particularisms are to be cultivated and preserved, but rather as a school for teaching all the Germans to understand and adapt their habits to one another. Whatever tends to have a separating influence in the life of the nation ought to be made a unifying influence in the army.” – Adolf Hitler

    “Berlin, as a world capital, can make one think only of ancient Egypt, it can be compared only to Babylon or Rome. In comparison with this capital, what will London stand for, or Paris?” – Adolf Hitler

    Hitler had predicted it earlier, and now it has become a reality

    And by the way, from the 1400s to the present day millions of white people have settled in North America and Australia, why do you keep silent and feel it is not a problem, and at first time when “discovering” that territory, they come not just merely being immigrants, they carry armaments like guns, cannons, and smallpox toxins, and kill millions of indigenous people, then make the country there, and the indigenous people are regarded not to know the ownership of the land

    In contrast to refugees from countries in Africa and the Middle East who are now looking for a place to live in Europe, they save themselves from civil war and do not carry any firearms, AND DONT HAVE THE DESIRE TO MASS KILL THE NATIVES, THEN MAKE THEIR OWN COUNTRY

  32. AS says:

    @Sadhaka

    “I experienced the Moroccan and Turkish children, teenagers and adults around me as extremely tribal. Although I became friends with non-Islamic Indonesians and people of other ethnicities, that never happened with the Muslim classmates. Those kids, who kept to themselves, spoke Arabic with each other, and during the holidays they’d go to the countries of their parents. They had their own tribe.”

    If vegans socialize exclusively with other vegans, they are not being tribal, they merely HAVE STANDARDS. Vegans certainly do not discourage others from also becoming vegan, quite the contrary! The Muslim mentality is not tribalism, but more similar to what I have just described.

    “It is better to sit alone than in company with the bad; and it is better to sit in company with the good than alone.” – Mohammed

    From my own experience, Muslims despise pork-eaters, which is why I, a vegan non-Muslim, have always been treated respectfully by Muslims. David Myatt, who was also a vegan even before he became a Muslim, writes of similar respect towards him from Muslims, which matches my own experience. As I have tried to explain before:

    Muslims listen to me because they know I do not do any haram. This is the key distinction in the typical Muslim mind: not whether or not someone has formally taken Shahada, but whether or not their personal lifestyle is “clean” by Islamic standards.

    I therefore ask you: when you failed to socialize with your Muslim classmates, were you doing any haram in your personal lifestyle?

    Meanwhile:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5249659/French-mayor-scraps-pork-free-school-meals.html

    “Later on in my life (1995, in Amsterdam) I went to a library and outside a couple of kids made jokes about me, which I didn’t understand. When I came out of the library, my bicycle was trashed. One day while walking through Utrecht, TWO separate groups of Moroccans deliberaty bumped their shoulders against mine (even though I was just minding my own business, listening to music on my headphones). In other words: several personal experiences which gave me the impression that they targeted ME because I’m visibly “White”. I was not in any way racist (many of my friends, crushes, pop idols and gurus had been non-White), but those Moroccans clearly were.”

    How do you know your bicycle was trashed by the same kids who made jokes about you? And even if it had been them, how do you know that they did so because you were “white”? There seems to be a lot of jumping to conclusions going on. How do you know the shoulder-bumpers were Moroccans? (Did you ask them?? Were they carrying Moroccan flags???)

    “In 1998 my Polish wife was being followed through Antwerpen by an Arab man, until after many minutes and many turns she rang a random doorbell to get inside somewhere, calling me for help.”

    I am not even going to touch this one unless you can get your wife on here to tell the story herself.

    “Around the same time I met a Belgian guy who had first converted to Islam but then became an apostate (because he took an interest in Hinduism), resulting in him receiving numerous death threats.”

    Was it explained to him prior to his conversion that apostasy after conversion was prohibited? If so, then it is his fault for lacking honour.

    “In 1999 my wife and I were living in Amsterdam and the local newspaper reported on the constant vandalism and harassment, by (mostly Moroccan) immigrant children and teens, in the various swimming pools.”

    Was it the newspaper claiming that it was “mostly Moroccan immigrant children and teens”, or is it you guessing?

    “So you see, I’m having some disagreement with being labelled Islamophobic (“irrationally fearful of Islam”).”

    Based on the way you describe your experiences, what I see is:

    1) you presume Moroccans are Muslims and that their behaviour is caused by their religion, so that bad behaviour by Moroccans is accrued to Islam;

    2) you presume people (whom you do not know individually) are Moroccan;

    3) you presume your “whiteness” is the reason for negative treatment towards you.

    Am I supposed to consider this not irrational?

    “how can it be that so many kindhearted people dislike Muslims but have no problems whatsoever associating with immigrants from other parts of the world?”

    I agree that not all Islamophobes are racists, and if you can point to where on the main site I suggest otherwise, I would be happy to amend it.

    On the other hand, I have observed over the years plenty of people who began (in the early 2000s) as solely Islamophobic but who eventually (by the 2010s) became racist. In contrast, I have never seen even one ACTIVE anti-Islamophobe become racist. So I find it justified to consider Islamophobia as a psychological stepping-stone towards racism, and active anti-Islamophobia as a reliable sign that someone will be able to resist racist propaganda.

    “And sure, not every Muslim in my life has been violent towards me, and I’ve also encountered plenty of Dutch and African criminals and arseholes, but all in all it’s mostly been Muslims and their children.”

    It appears that most of the people you have described as being violent towards you were men. Do you therefore view men in general the same way you view Muslims in general? In order to be consistent, you should. In fact let’s go back to this part:

    “We had Moroccan neighbors who were very friendly to us, but regularly the man was shouting very loudly at his wife and sometimes we could hear banging noises too, indicating physical violence.”

    Would it not be more reasonable for you to derive a negative impression of men, rather than of Muslims, based on this particular personal experience? If so, and yet nevertheless your actual impression is negativity towards Muslims more than negativity towards men, how can you deny being Islamophic?

    “I have read passages on the Aryanism site that were positive about the phenomenon of no-go zones, but from my perspective those are tribal areas. Muslims may be theoretically universalist, but in practice (and in general) their attitude towards the kuffar is still very tribal.”

    Have not the kuffar the option to convert to Islam? So long as they do, and they are accepted after conversion, that is not tribalism, but again merely HAVING STANDARDS.

    “Racist even. Individual attacks are almost always aimed at “Whites”.”

    So you are saying that Muslims are fine with “non-white” non-Muslims? If so, then how is this different from our own attitude towards Jews? This is ANTI-racist behaviour, as it was “whites” who decided to call themselves “whites”, just as it was Jews who decided to call themselves Jews.

    “For people who were born and raised in such areas, and who don’t have the financial means to move out, the rapid change into no-go zone has been hellish. Shouldn’t we be compassionate towards those people too? When all of a sudden they are being confronted with amplified calls to prayer, against their wishes, and can’t walk around with their pets anymore, or need to be escorted by a man at all times, isn’t that violent too?”

    If you wish to finance them to be able to move out, I would consider that compassionate. I myself am confronted daily with streets full of cars, against my wishes, and have to be escorted by traffic lights at all times, and dogs have to be on leashes (which itself is cruel). That is violence too (on an indescribably greater scale). The rapid Westernization around the world has been hellish. Can I also get money from you to move to somewhere without cars?

    “There are also passages on the Aryanism site taking the side of the Moors, even though between 711 and 791 AD they demanded a yearly tribute of 100 virgin girls (i.e. a total of about 8,000 innocent children, and more if Isabella and Ferdinand had not ended it), to be abused in their harems, not to mention that the Moors were good friends with the Jews. Similarly the Ottoman Empire (and their Jewish accomplices) demanded a tribute of boys from the various Balkan countries, to be forcibly converted to Islam and then serve as Janissaries.”

    And Isabella and Ferdinand had no Jewish accomplices?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_de_Sant%C3%A1ngel

    I will trust the state with looking after children long before I trust parents.

    “Not to mention the Barbary pirates who kidnapped and enslaved thousands of men, women and children from the coastal areas of Europe (including the Netherlands). If we’re going to be frank about colonialism, shouldn’t we be frank about those abuses too?”

    All of them were given the option to convert to Islam and thus receive full citizenship, which they themselves chose to turn down. Were the victims of colonialism ever given the option to be “white” and thus receive full citizenship?

    “India too has had its share of Islamic violence (with many of its temples smashed and desecrated), centuries before Israel was created.”

    Yes, Savitri Devi covered this magnificently:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/the-battle-for-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-174004

    “When the Taliban blew up the Buddhas of Bamiyan, that was nothing new to me.”

    Before Siddhartha died, he expressly told his disciples NOT to build statues of him after his death. His disciples did so anyway. Siddhartha would be happy to know that the statues are gone at last.

    “Many of them were unquestionably carried out by Muslims, either independently or organized by an Islamic cell.”

    Unquestionably? And then you complain about being called Islamophobic?

    “You condemn the Alt-Right for being Useful Idiots, but I have not come across a single statement condemning these Muslims as Useful Idiots, even though their violence, aimed at civilians, is the primary cause of “Islamophobia”.”

    We consider rank-and-file ISIS troops to be useful idiots (though the leaders are Zionist agents).

    “And because the increase in the number of Muslims has been accompanied by an increase in the number of violent (sex) crimes”

    An increase in the number of ALLEGATIONS:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/the-colocaust/

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/colohoax-confirmed/

    You automatically presume every allegation to be real just because the accused is a Muslim, in other words you believe innocent until proven guilty does not apply to Muslims, and then you complain about being called Islamophobic?

    “It’s perfectly understandable that people are fearful of further Islamization.”

    It is perfectly understandable that barbarians who can be suckered by novice-level herding techniques that stimulate the most primitive parts of their brains are fearful of further Islamization.

    “Why be compassionate towards the immigrants but not towards the people who keep hearing about children and the elderly being robbed, raped, assaulted, stabbed, doused with acid etc.?”

    No crime committed by one individual can ever be a reason to treat ANY OTHER individual as guilty until proven innocent. Those who use crime committed by individuals who happen to be immigrants as a reason for anti-immigration policy are not treating out-group people as individuals, and are in practice advocating punishing the innocent for the actions of the guilty. Those who consider it acceptable to not treat out-group people as individuals, and to punish the innocent for the actions of the guilty, indeed deserve no compassion.

    Moreover, individuals inclined to criminality will commit crime wherever they are, so turning away even criminal immigrants does not reduce total crime, but merely ensures that those crimes which do occur victimize disproportionately people in the out-group INSTEAD OF people in the in-group. Those who consider it preferable that crimes victimize one’s out-group INSTEAD OF one’s in-group indeed deserve no compassion.

    “It’s also very common for Muslim immigrants to lose their temper in hospitals, screaming at or physically attacking nurses and surgeons.”

    I wish I had done that instead of being successfully coerced into being shot up with vaccines as a child. I will regret my cowardice for the rest of my life. But I will not rest until Western medicine is destroyed. The people whom you describe are my allies.

    “In the no-go zones, ambulance personnel and firefighters routinely get pelted with rocks and heavy fireworks.”

    Sanctuary cities need to start doing this to ICE. Preferably with live ammunition.

    “I agree that SOME of the PEGIDA and other far-right protesters are going too far with their pig blood etc., but shouldn’t we treat members of those groups as individuals too?”

    They are indeed individuals, and all individuals who choose to join PEGIDA are our enemies on account of PEGIDA’s ideology alone, which they indicate they as indivduals endorse by their respective individual decisions to join PEGIDA.

    “Although meat consumption is higher in the West, the public slaughtering of animals is much more normalized in Islamic countries.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_and_shooting_in_the_United_Kingdom

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_in_Australia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_in_New_Zealand

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_in_Romania

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_in_Russia

    etc.

    I will not bother to bring up bullfighting.

    “Western children, though eating more flesh, retain their empathy for other living creatures?”

    http://huntdrop.com/uploads/hunts/what-age-should-kids-start-hunting.jpg

    https://wixxy.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/child-hunting.jpg

    http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/files/2006/10/kids.jpeg

    https://img-realtree.com/sites/default/files/styles/site_large/public/content/inserts/youthduckhunter.jpg

    https://speakupforthevoiceless.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/g8h.jpg

    http://www.blogsmonroe.com/hunting/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/darryls-pictures6.jpg

    http://www.chasinbacon.com/mediafiles/gallery_images/124_Florida_Youth_Hog_Hunting_Boar_Chasin_Bacon_Honey_Hole.png

    https://thegreatwhitehunter.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/bunny-two-boys.jpg

    https://tadpolesoutdoorblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/iphone_10_11-034.jpg

    http://www.lonestarpremieroutdoors.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/texas-dove-hunting-kids.jpg

    http://gentlemanfarmer.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Involve-Your-Children-in-Quail-Hunting-in-Texas-040512-03.jpg

    https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Youth-duck-hunting.jpg

    http://andersoncreekhunting.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/hunting-north-carolina-kids-youth002.jpg

    http://honeyholehuntclub.com/mediafiles/gallery_images/18_florida_kids_hunting_wild_Boar_Honey_Hole.jpg

    http://www.crosman.com/connect/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/IMG00020-20100815-1421.jpg

    http://www.deeranddeerhunting.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/kids-in-hunting.jpg

    (I promise that I did not pick and choose pictures for “white” children. I just typed in “children hunting”, and literally the only “non-white” children that came up in five pages of results were:

    http://www.leefendallhouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/easter-6.jpg

    http://www.tbo.com/storyimage/TB/20150405/ARTICLE/150409827/AR/0/AR-150409827.jpg

    http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/60/32/53/12692202/3/920×920.jpg )

    “What do you think?”

    Western civilization must die.

  33. Lucius Rhine says:

    @AS

    I remember when I was young, my father took me fishing a few times. I never enjoyed it but he insisted I go. I would sit with him while he fished, I always thought it was boring to sit in a boat and wait to kill something innocent. I saw no real point. Then he made me actually fish one day, and the fish had swallowed the hook. He made me yank the whole thing out, and then release it, since he had fished our whole limit for the day. The fish was pretty much already dead, but my father did not care. I cried.

    I have never agreed to even be around fishermen since.

  34. Amaleq says:

    @Lucius Rhine:

    I had a similar experience with my step-father. I never went fishing ever again either.

  35. Sadhaka says:

    Gerulf wrote: “This site is predisposed towards gnosticism”

    I am too, so that’s not a problem to me.

    “While I myself am favorably disposed towards Islam, I have not overlooked its unfortunate merger with Judaism.”

    That actually became my point of view back in 2011, several years before I started reading Alt-Right sources, namely that Islam was Judaism for 6th century Arabs, with significant overlap when it comes to genital mutilation, dietary rules and appreciation for the myth of Abraham/Ibrahim ready to kill his son Isaac/Ishmael (thus both of them being Abrahamic religions). But I can appreciate the idea that Islam (and Christianity) are closer to Zoroastrianism.

    *****

    Fatih Dion wrote: “Do not just blame the strangers”

    I do not actually blame individual strangers. Rather, I’m looking at a collective and asking whether that collective as a whole (prior to Aryanization of its gene pool) is desirable or undesirable. Most people in the Netherlands consider the collective of Chinese people a net positive: no petty crime and instead lots of nice restaurants, acupunture/TCM health centers, martial arts schools etc. And although Arabs have also brought many popular grocery stores, bakeries and kebab restaurants, for many people the crime, fecundity and religious tensions increasingly outweigh these benefits.

    “blame your government too”

    I do, but that government is still in place, yet you are encouraging immigration under the current circumstances. A National-Socialist/Aryanist government may not arise for another decade, but still you are supporting a continued influx of people from radically different cultural backgrounds.

    “How to solve immigration problem”

    I read that page carefully and I appreciate the proposed policies, but those policies are not in place yet. Until they are, there will be virtually no enthusiasm among Europeans to welcome even more refugees than have already arrived in the last five years.

    “And their tribalist attitude is not from his religion, but the habit of living in his former country”

    It’s both, as AS confirmed in the comment which I will address below.

    “The right-wing people with their vain energy tried to tell us that the National Socialists were a movement for “white people”,”

    I personally do not claim it’s FOR “Whites” only, but it’s an undeniable fact that it arose in Germany and that 99% of the people living in the Third Reich area had “White” ancestry. Take any pre-war picture showing crowds and processions and what you see are “White” men and women.

    “Hitler had predicted it earlier, and now it has become a reality”

    But look at how dystopian things have become. That he predicted a general trend does not mean he had the current manifestation in mind.

    “And by the way, from the 1400s to the present day millions of white people have settled in North America and Australia, why do you keep silent and feel it is not a problem”

    I’ve been discussing the obstacles to Aryanism spreading in Europe here. Let’s stay on topic.

    I did comment on the American situation on another page, so perhaps you could challenge me on this matter there:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/heather-heyer-rip/

    “they save themselves from civil war”

    That’s actually a generalization which is false. A major reason why Europeans have stopped being so welcoming is that a huge number of immigrants from SAFE countries have also come over. Even EU commissioner Frans Timmermans has stated that about 60% of the young men are here solely for financial reasons. And although financial reasons could be regarded as a legitimate concern too, let’s not fool ourselves that all immigrants are fleeing war.

    *****

    AS wrote: “Muslims despise pork-eaters”

    This is the statement I was referring to above. The Muslim attitude towards pork-eaters is not based on compassion but on a dietary rule, akin to the Jewish kosher rules. The effect is the same: multi-generational segregation from the host population. And in fact the European disdain for halal slaughter is simply 1930s disdain for kosher slaughter all over again. The only reason why there isn’t more protest against it is because the (((Counter-Jihad))) doesn’t want to alienate the Jewish diaspora.

    White Nationalists don’t have that concern though and typically condemn both halal and kosher slaughter.

    “I therefore ask you: when you failed to socialize with your Muslim classmates, were you doing any haram in your personal lifestyle?”

    Yeah, totally haram. And non-kosher too!

    “Vegans certainly do not discourage others from also becoming vegan, quite the contrary!”

    I consider this argument a false equivalence. Veganism is not based on any ancient, non-European doctrine. There have not been any wars between Europeans and vegan armies. And throughout European history there have been vegetarians and vegans, including some very admirable individuals.

    Even modern, post-Earthlings vegans still speak the local language amongst each other and find ways to celebrate European festivals in their own way. Granted, they’re a subculture, and they want to change the world, but aside from some squabbling on the internet, their rise in numbers has NOT resulted in the formation of anti-vegan protest movements or political parties. I’ve known many vegans that remained friends with their non-vegan classmates, colleagues, fellow psychonauts etc.

    “How do you know your bicycle was trashed by the same kids who made jokes about you?”

    Because I went in and out just to bring back a couple of books. It was closing time so I did not search for any new ones. I was inside for maybe 45 to 90 seconds, and when I came out the bike was trashed and the kids were gone.

    “And even if it had been them, how do you know that they did so because you were “white”?”

    Not just because I have a light skin but also because I was CLEARLY a non-Muslim and therefore a legitimate target.

    “How do you know the shoulder-bumpers were Moroccans?”

    Obviously I cannot be certain all of them were, but in the Netherlands there are approximately 7.989 Algerians and 374.996 Moroccans. And since the groups looked more like Maghreb types than Turks (at 396.414 a similarly large group, but much less problematic), it’s more than likely that they were Moroccans.

    “Was it the newspaper claiming that it was “mostly Moroccan immigrant children and teens”, or is it you guessing?”

    The newspaper probably used the politically correct term “allochtone jongeren”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allochtoon

    But demographics and crime statistics indicate that “mostly Moroccans” is correct.

    “you presume Moroccans are Muslims and that their behaviour is caused by their religion, so that bad behaviour by Moroccans is accrued to Islam”

    There are many secular Turks in the Netherlands (some of them minor celebrities) but Moroccans typically claim to be Muslims, even if their behavior (crime, vandalism, cocaine use etc.) is anything but Islamic. However, invariably their home environment (parents and/or grandparents, uncles etc.) is Islamic. Those raised in secular and culturally Dutch homes, do not become part of street gangs.

    “you presume your “whiteness” is the reason for negative treatment towards you.”

    Yes, with the understanding that my “whiteness” includes visual signs that I’m not a Muslim, and thus not part of their in-group.

    “Am I supposed to consider this not irrational?”

    Yes. :) Although the examples I gave may be subjective and trivial, the argument I’m presenting is not.

    I assert that Muslim groups (as a collective) are every bit as tribal, hostile and pushy towards Europeans as Jews have been in the 19th and 20th century, and that the current response among Europeans is not at all that different from the way the German National-Socialists responded to the Jews (as a collective) talking Yiddish, engaging in ritual slaughter, cheating non-Jews and trying to convert Europeans to Communism, or the Gypsies with their reputation (as a collective) of being anti-social criminals.

    “I have observed over the years plenty of people who began (in the early 2000s) as solely Islamophobic but who eventually (by the 2010s) became racist.”

    Agreed. And this may well be because of broadband internet exposing Europeans to American websites, and thus to the White Nationalists there who, because of their circumstances, focused more on Blacks and Hispanics. Also, the migrant crisis may have started with Syrians fleeing the war (mostly coming via Turkey and Greece), but the arrivals in Italy and Spain, and those camped near Calais, included huge numbers of sub-Saharan Africans. There have been a bunch of viral videos showing such Africans (“Wassup?! Money! Money! Money!”).

    “It appears that most of the people you have described as being violent towards you were men. Do you therefore view men in general the same way you view Muslims in general?”

    Looking at the COLLECTIVE of men, I’d say yes, certainly. Since about 95% of violent criminals are men, I favor a police force that is 95% male to subdue those criminals. In practice this means all police officers should be men, because there will rarely be teams of 100 officers. Most missions will involve groups of 5 or 10 officers, and if they have to be 95% men, this can only be accomplished when all the 5 or 10 officers are men.

    And that is not a Traditionalist or anti-feminist argument. I’m simply being pragmatic. On an individual basis, I obviously do not assume every man I encounter is a violent criminal, or that every single woman is physically weak, but when it comes to policy-making, averages and statistics should not be ignored.

    “Would it not be more reasonable for you to derive a negative impression of men, rather than of Muslims, based on this particular personal experience?”

    No, because I’ve moved about 40 times in my life, with many different neighbors, and I have not experienced a consistent pattern of screaming, violent husbands. Subjective, perhaps, but it can be meaningfully related to the taboo on domestic violence in the modern West, and encouragement of corporal punishment in the Quran and Hadiths.

    “Have not the kuffar the option to convert to Islam?”

    Have not the goyim the option of embracing Zionism?

    “So long as they do, and they are accepted after conversion, that is not tribalism”

    Then Zionism isn’t tribalism either because ANYONE can become a Zionist and benefit from the perks which that standard provides: “A shekel for the good goy!”

    “So you are saying that Muslims are fine with “non-white” non-Muslims?”

    No, I didn’t say that. We’re talking about the Muslims moving into Europe, which in most places is still 80 to 95% “White”, and unless those “Whites” dress and shave themselves like Muslims do, a “White” is therefore a recognizable member of the out-group i.e. a despicable pork-eating kuffar.

    “This is ANTI-racist behaviour”

    I understand that Islam is universalist, but Muslim immigration would require mass conversion of all Europeans to result in a situation where race is no longer a marker of who is and who is not a kuffar. Integration of the new arrivals would also require complete Islamization of the continent. And THEN you’d have to convince all these converted Muslims to become vegans…

    “If you wish to finance them to be able to move out, I would consider that compassionate.”

    So if we simply finance the Palestinians so they can move elsewhere, all is well?

    Moreover, where to move the Europeans currently stuck in no-go zones if more and more Muslims keep entering Europe and more and more regions are turning into Sharia zones?

    And although I may buy them a nice house somewhere, away from the cities, is there any guarantee they can find work there?

    “And Isabella and Ferdinand had no Jewish accomplices?”

    Your example is of a single converso, while there were more than 200,000 Jews practicing Judaism in Moorish Spain.

    “Were the victims of colonialism ever given the option to be “white” and thus receive full citizenship?”

    We’re not discussing colonialism. We’ve been discussing the movement of Muslims into Europe. My original comment was in regards to the subjective experience of Europeans, why they have become “Islamophobic”, and what will be the difficulties convincing them of the merits of Aryanism.

    “Unquestionably?”

    The murderers of Lee Rigby were very straightforward about it, blood dripping from their hands. Theo van Gogh was murdered by a very proud and unrepentant Mohammed Bouyeri. I haven’t come across any conspiracy theories arguing that the Normandy church attack was a False Flag. I could go on and on.

    “You automatically presume every allegation to be real”

    No I didn’t. When I wrote that comment I was actually thinking of confirmed crimes, like the famous “sexual emergency” case of the Iraqi man who raped a boy in an Austrian swimming pool, and also four confirmed cases of sexual molestation in the Netherlands, including one rape captured by security cameras. There are many. The Rotherham scandal is not a hoax. The rape and murder of Maria Ladenburger (daughter of EU official) was not a hoax. The abduction, rape and murder of Elin Krantz was not a hoax.

    “No crime committed by one individual can ever be a reason to treat ANY OTHER individual as guilty until proven innocent.”

    That’s a Straw Man. Nobody is saying they should be treated as being GUILTY. Well, actually some people do, I must admit: those who refer to immigrants as “rapefugees”. I denounce people who use such terms.

    “I wish I had done that instead of being successfully coerced into being shot up with vaccines as a child.”

    And that’s a Red Herring. The people attacking and threatening nurses and surgeons do not do so because they have anything against Western medicine.

    Just like the Taliban weren’t interested in fulfilling Siddhartha’s testament, and indeed, not all of those statues depicted Siddhartha anyway. Moreover, Siddhartha discouraged worship, and the statues weren’t being worshiped. They were just cultural heritage, just as the temples and statues in Syria were.

    “Sanctuary cities need to start doing this to ICE.”

    Another false equivalence. ICE has nothing in common with the aims of ambulance personnel, fire fighters and garbage collectors.

    “I will not bother to bring up bullfighting.”

    Bullfighting is solely a sport for perverse entertainment, whereas hunting serves several purposes and for that reason was not banned but merely regulated in National-Socialist Germany.

    Moreover, unless encouraged by their parents, children do not line up to become hunters. It’s gruesome and especially in Europe not something that children engage in, as far as I’m aware. Indeed, many of the American children that learn hunting early on go on to join the United States military, and we all know about the atrocities they’ve committed. If anything, the popularity of hunting among Americans simply confirms my position that childhood exposure to bloodshed has a negative effect on the retention of empathy.

    Isn’t it so that veganism is especially becoming popular in Western countries?

    Found the following: “According to Mintel’s Global New Products Database (GNPD), Germany was the leading market for vegan food and drink product launch activity in 2016, with 18% of all global food and drink product launches with vegan claims occurring in Germany. The only country coming close to this amount of vegan launch activity in 2016 was the United States, where 17% of all new global vegan food and drink products were launched, followed by the UK with 10% global share.”

    That confirms my theory. Because of course not all American children are being encouraged to learn hunting. Most keep it at target practice.

    “No crime committed by one individual can ever be a reason to treat ANY OTHER individual as guilty until proven innocent. Those who use crime committed by individuals who happen to be immigrants as a reason for anti-immigration policy are not treating out-group people as individuals, and are in practice advocating punishing the innocent for the actions of the guilty.”

    Here you are equating “protecting one’s borders” with “punishing the innocent”, and reducing everything to the issue of crime alone, whereas it’s actually a complex of problems, statistically related to the number of immigrant families, that has resulted in European resistance against Muslim immigration.

    The example that’s often given is that of the bowl of smarties. If only some of the smarties are poisonous, that’s sufficient reason to throw away the entire bowl. In regards to the immigrant situation, that would mean closing the borders to further immigration and deporting those who manifestly have no desire to participate in European society but want to remain separate like another diaspora. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Those who favor shariah can return to states where shariah is the official standard. European states have no moral obligation to take care of refugees that want to subvert the nation to implement shariah and spread their foreign, hostile religion (“ISLAM WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD”, “MASSACRE THOSE WHO INSULT ISLAM”).

    “Those who consider it acceptable to not treat out-group people as individuals,”

    But if it’s the conscious choice of those people to remain an out-group, just like the Jews and Gypsies chose to be so, then it’s their own fault if the host population turns against them.

    I say the no-go zones are very much like the Israeli settlements in Palestine. In both cases the original population is driven out by immigrants using force (in Palestine with bullets and bulldozers, in the no-go zones with bullying and crime aimed at the kuffar).

    You condemn the former but rejoice about the latter. I can’t help but consider this another type of Boromir Syndrome. Driving out Palestinians to settle Jews, bad, but driving out Europeans to settle Muslims, good?

  36. @Amaleq

    “Trump is like Stalin”
    https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/trump-commie-traitor.jpg

    I guess more and more people are beginning to think so.

  37. AS says:

    @Lucius & Amaleq

    I sincerely wish both of you to have a chance to put a hook through your respective (step)fathers’ palate and hang him from it at some point in the future.

    @Sadhaka

    “Yeah, totally haram.”

    So blame yourself for being rejected. I do not do haram, and I am accepted by Muslims. I can now demand that Muslims be vegan (and other things that I try to promote) in order to be accepted by me! And I have converted a number of Muslim individuals to veganism via this approach. This is positive integration: I meet every standard they set, and then challenge them to meet the additional standards I set.

    “And non-kosher too!”

    Yet do you notice that Jews have no problem with socializing with non-kosher non-Jews? This shows that Jews have no interest in sincere friendship, but are merely networking for the sake of potential gain to themselves when the opportunity arises.

    With Muslims, if you are accepted by them, the friendship is real.

    “There have not been any wars between Europeans and vegan armies.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albigensian_Crusade

    “Because I went in and out just to bring back a couple of books. It was closing time so I did not search for any new ones. I was inside for maybe 45 to 90 seconds, and when I came out the bike was trashed and the kids were gone.”

    In other words you are guessing.

    “Not just because I have a light skin but also because I was CLEARLY a non-Muslim and therefore a legitimate target.”

    Clearly? Were you eating a ham sandwich at the time?

    “Obviously I cannot be certain all of them were”

    Thank you.

    “but in the Netherlands there are approximately 7.989 Algerians and 374.996 Moroccans. And since the groups looked more like Maghreb types than Turks (at 396.414 a similarly large group, but much less problematic), it’s more than likely that they were Moroccans.”

    And how do you know they were not Dutch? Were they playing Passport Frisbee when they shoulder-bumped you?

    “The newspaper probably used the politically correct term “allochtone jongeren”.
    But demographics and crime statistics indicate that “mostly Moroccans” is correct.”

    In other words you are guessing.

    “Yes, with the understanding that my “whiteness” includes visual signs that I’m not a Muslim, and thus not part of their in-group.”

    Oh, so you have a half-eaten ham sandwich in your hand non-stop while in public?

    “I assert that Muslim groups (as a collective)”

    Collective assertions of any kind say more about the lack of honour of the asserter than about any of the individuals placed into the collective by the asserter’s prejudice.

    “Looking at the COLLECTIVE of men, I’d say yes, certainly.”

    So would you thus consider it fair to punish innocent men along with guilty men?

    “Have not the goyim the option of embracing Zionism?”

    Do Zionist Shabbos Goys = Jews according to Jewish law? (Muslims = Muslims according to Islamic law.)

    “Then Zionism isn’t tribalism either because ANYONE can become a Zionist and benefit from the perks which that standard provides: “A shekel for the good goy!””

    A shekel is not the same as becoming a full partner of the firm. Allen West isn’t going to get Israeli citizenship any time soon.

    Your fallacy is already covered on the main site which you claim to have read:

    A common lie told by our enemies is that Muslims are a tribe just as Jews are. This is easily rebutted by pointing out that the Islamic goal is that one day everyone will become Muslim (ie. no more tribes), whereas the Judaic goal is that one day every Jew will have 2600 non-Jewish slaves (ie. domination of one tribe over everyone else for all time).

    http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-islam/

    “unless those “Whites” dress and shave themselves like Muslims do”

    ?????? You mean like Sadiq Khan? Or do you mean like Mo Farah?

    “Integration of the new arrivals would also require complete Islamization of the continent. And THEN you’d have to convince all these converted Muslims to become vegans…”

    Yes, so stop wasting our time, as you can see we are more than busy enough already.

    “So if we simply finance the Palestinians so they can move elsewhere, all is well?”

    Israel’s plan is not to turn Palestinians into Israelis. Therefore the Palestinians deserve the territory. The Ummah’s plan is for everyone to become part of the Ummah. Therefore the Ummah deserves the territory.

    “Your example is of a single converso, while there were more than 200,000 Jews practicing Judaism in Moorish Spain.”

    That single one under Western civilization did more damage than those 200000 under Islam.

    “We’re not discussing colonialism.”

    You earlier:

    If we’re going to be frank about colonialism, shouldn’t we be frank about those abuses too?

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/can-2018-start-any-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-178200

    My response:

    Were the victims of colonialism ever given the option to be “white” and thus receive full citizenship?

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/can-2018-start-any-worse/comment-page-1/#comment-178200

    Your response:

    We’re not discussing colonialism.

    “The murderers of Lee Rigby were very straightforward about it, blood dripping from their hands.”

    We have never claimed this was a false flag. Rigby was a state-sponsored Zionist terrorist who participated in the invasion of Afghanistan. Are you also going to complain about Palestinians who kill off-duty IDF troops?

    “Theo van Gogh was murdered by a very proud and unrepentant Mohammed Bouyeri.”

    We have never claimed this was a false flag. Van Gogh was a Zionist propagandist, and thanks to Bouyeri one less that we have to deal with.

    “I haven’t come across any conspiracy theories arguing that the Normandy church attack was a False Flag.”

    The alleged attackers were killed on the spot, meaning they were unable to testify in their own defence. If you do not suspect that this is a false flag, you are a fool.

    “four confirmed cases of sexual molestation in the Netherlands”

    I am sure I can come up with more than four cases committed by people weighing over 50kg. Let’s start profiling people weighing over 50kg!

    “The Rotherham scandal is not a hoax.”

    The ignored scandal is that consensual sex is punishable by law if one side regrets it later.

    The other ignored scandal is the Zionist media portraying it as if the prostitution ring deliberately recruited only “white” prostitutes, rather than that all the individuals willing to get involved just happened to be “white”.

    “The rape and murder of Maria Ladenburger (daughter of EU official) was not a hoax. The abduction, rape and murder of Elin Krantz was not a hoax.”

    And the perpetrators have been arrested for trial and sentencing. What more do you want? Punishing the innocent?

    “The people attacking and threatening nurses and surgeons do not do so because they have anything against Western medicine.”

    Western medicine involves haram.

    “Just like the Taliban weren’t interested in fulfilling Siddhartha’s testament”

    They were anti-idolatry, as Siddhartha also was.

    “ICE has nothing in common with the aims of ambulance personnel, fire fighters and garbage collectors.”

    The point is I like this way of doing things. If sanctuary cities were run like no-go zones, they would better live up to their name.

    “Moreover, unless encouraged by their parents, children do not line up to become hunters.”

    Eid al-Adha was also not invented by children. So why did you bring it up?

    “Isn’t it so that veganism is especially becoming popular in Western countries?”

    As demographic shift continues, it will become even more popular.

    “Here you are equating “protecting one’s borders” with “punishing the innocent”,”

    What guilt is there is being born on the wrong side of a border?

    “reducing everything to the issue of crime alone”

    You brought up crime first. My approach to crime is to deal with it case by case. The moment crime is used as a reason to reduce immigration, you are punishing the innocent.

    “The example that’s often given is that of the bowl of smarties. If only some of the smarties are poisonous, that’s sufficient reason to throw away the entire bowl.”

    But you are not throwing away the bowl, you are giving the smarties to someone else. As I said previously, criminals will commit crime wherever they are. Preventing them from migrating just means that ensuring victims of crime will be people from the out-group. That is tribalism.

    (It is also tribalism to treat out-group people as smarties and only in-group people as actual people.)

    “manifestly have no desire to participate in European society but want to remain separate like another diaspora”

    If they want to remain separate they would not preach Islam, but would keep it private as Jews keep Judaism private.

    “When in Rome, do as the Romans do”

    Rome become Christianized, so why not now Islamized? In fact:

    we consider Islam to be the statist successor to the Roman Empire, and hence as statists side with both*. This is a consistent position, and in fact the National Socialist position. On the other hand, those who complain about the historical Islamic rule in Europe should on the same grounds complain about the historical Roman rule in Europe also, but they don’t, because they have double-standards.

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/western-civilization-late-20th-century-pop-culture/

    “European states have no moral obligation to take care of refugees”

    To welcome them as new citizens, yes. To give them free stuff, no.

    “that want to subvert the nation to implement shariah and spread their foreign, hostile religion”

    There is nothing hostile about a religion that welcomes conversion by anyone.

    “But if it’s the conscious choice of those people to remain an out-group”

    It is not. Their ultimate aim is for everyone to be Muslim.

    “I say the no-go zones are very much like the Israeli settlements in Palestine. In both cases the original population is driven out by immigrants using force (in Palestine with bullets and bulldozers, in the no-go zones with bullying and crime aimed at the kuffar).”

    I repeat: Israel’s plan is not to turn Palestinians into Israelis. Therefore the Palestinians deserve the territory. The Ummah’s plan is for everyone to become part of the Ummah. Therefore the Ummah deserves the territory.

    “You condemn the former but rejoice about the latter.”

    I condemn tribalists owning territory and rejoice about universalists owning territory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>