Anti-Zionist harvest: Twitter edition

I love Cancel Culture, and so should you:

https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/star-of-david-deemed-hateful-imagery-by-twitter-635847

The Star of David has been deemed “hateful imagery” by Twitter, which is locking the accounts of users who display it in their profile pictures. The Campaign Against Antisemitism has reported that several Twitter users have contacted them in recent days to report that their accounts had been locked by the social media platform. The reason given? According to messages they received from Twitter: “We have determined that this account violated the Twitter Rules. Specifically for: Violating our rules against posting hateful imagery. You may not use hateful images or symbols in your profile image or profile header. As a result, we have locked your account.”

I as usual disagree with the description “hateful” (should be “racist” instead), but of course agree with the spirit of the lockout. At last, awareness of the Star of David as a symbol of Jewish racism towards non-Jews is filtering into mainstream consciousness! Frankly, I never understood why it took so long. David was an obvious racist according to the Tanakh itself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David#Narrative

God Yahweh is angered when Saul, Israel’s king, unlawfully offers a sacrifice[17] and later disobeys a divine command both to kill all of the Amalekites and to destroy their confiscated property.[18] Consequently, God Yahweh sends the prophet Samuel to anoint a shepherd, David, the youngest son of Jesse of Bethlehem, to be king instead.[19]

Achish permits David to reside in Ziklag, close to the border between Gath and Judea, from where he leads raids against the Geshurites, the Girzites and the Amalekites [ie. non-Jews], but leads Achish to believe he is attacking the Israelites in Judah, the Jerahmeelites and the Kenites [ie. Jews].

He conquers Jerusalem, previously a Jebusite [ie. non-Jew] stronghold, and makes it his capital.[43]

David wins additional victories over the Philistines, Moabites, Edomites, Amalekites, Ammonites and king Hadadezer of Aram-Zobah, [ie.-non-Jews] after which they become tributaries.[47]

so any symbol celebrating him should have been effortlessly recognized as racist.

Next, Twitter should treat the menorah similarly. Part of the emblem of Israel (as well as the Seal of Mossad):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emblem_of_Israel

it represents in Judaism the ambition to build the Third Temple:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Temple

which motivated the creation of Israel and continues to motivate the ongoing land grabs.

Back to the first link:

This is not the first time that Twitter has come in for criticism over apparent endemic antisemitism. Last week the platform was accused of inciting anti-Jewish hatred after it refused to take action when the hashtag #JewishPrivilege began trending.

Please continue to share widely. More available at:

https://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/Jews-Selling-Blacks-Book-Stirs-Reparations-Movement.shtml

And again, we do not support mere financial reparations, which we view as bribery of the victims of racism to placate them into dropping charges. Instead, we plead that victims of racism refuse to be satisfied with anything less than all racist bloodlines being prohibited from reproducing. Racism will only end when racist bloodlines no longer exist. The best Cancel Culture is genetic Cancel Culture (a.k.a. Aryanization).

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/blm/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/jews-have-nothing-in-common-with-us!/

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Anti-Zionist harvest: Twitter edition

  1. . says:

    You don’t love cancel culture. When it was applied to your true left forum you didn’t embrace being cancelled. Hypocritical scum, your blood ought to go extinct along with the jews.

  2. Mza9 says:

    @.

    We are right and you are wrong. Learn to accept it. You will rest easier at night.

  3. . says:

    Go fuck yourself hypocrite. Cancel culture is fine so long as it doesn’t affect you, what a load of BS.

  4. I don’t know if you’ve heard about it:
    https://variety.com/2020/film/news/ukraine-president-hostage-situation-joaquin-phoenix-film-1234712907/

    An armed man in Ukraine held 13 people hostage and demanded the country’s president publicly endorse a Joaquin Phoenix film before he’d free them.

    According to The New York Times, a standoff between the hostage taker, identified as Maksim Krivosh, and the police lasted nearly 12 hours. One of the man’s demands was that President Volodymyr Zelensky tell Ukrainians to watch the 2005 film “Earthlings,” narrated by Phoenix.

    Zelensky followed the request, posting on Facebook, “Everybody watch the 2005 documentary ‘Earthlings.’” He later deleted the post.

    The film examines the use of animals in agricultural and scientific industries and includes hidden camera footage of animals suffering. It also compares speciesism to racism and sexism among humans.

    After Zelensky posted the message about “Earthlings,” Krivosh released all the hostages and surrendered to police, according to The New York Times. He had let three hostages go earlier in the day after speaking to the president over the phone. None of the hostages were harmed.
    ————
    This guy, Maksim Krivosh, should get a medal. As for me, is a hero in the struggle for animal liberation.

  5. Mza9 says:

    @AM:

    He is a hero! I need to go watch that film now!

    @.

    You don’t even know what ‘cancel culture’ is. How does the following apply to us?

    “Cancel culture refers to the popular practice of withdrawing support for (canceling) public figures and companies after they have done or said something considered objectionable or offensive. Cancel culture is generally discussed as being performed on social media in the form of group shaming.” https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/cancel-culture/

    Yet again you have proven yourself a moron, good job! No one takes you seriously, not even in your “white” circles obviously or you wouldn’t spend so much time here.

  6. . says:

    I’m not white, you god damned racist piece of shit. When trueleft forum got deplatformed, that was an attempt at cancelling by someone. Yet the forum was put up elsewhere, spitting in the face of ‘cancel culture’. Yet sadly I have come to anticipate such abhorrent hypocrisy by this ‘movement’, abandoning supposedly important ideals for convenience all too often. You sicken me and you’ll end up in the same mass graves as every last kike.

  7. Penny For Your Thoughts says:

    I think “.” is merely concerned that this site is drawing too close to the mainstream. A reminder is in order that the job of the revolutionary is not to preserve the system but to ultimately destroy it. The System and those who support it should be recognized as enemies in the long run, and that drawing too close means allowing oneself to be co-opted by the powers that be and those who defend them.

    Any revolutionary should avoid being swept up in the current of the current powers that be and any rhetoric they approve of.

  8. . says:

    They won’t listen, Penny. They’ve been chugging the kool-aid for too long. So certain of their chosen path that they refuse to believe it could be headed in the wrong direction. With this current trajectory they’ll probably end up like the Necromongers, a spacefaring death cult that condemns all breeders. Keeping what they kill until Underverse come and the Furyans destroy them.

  9. Mza9 says:

    Anti-Racist forums being taken down because of racist complainers is hardly “cancel culture”. Rather, it is just another part of the anti-racist struggle.

    “Genetic Cancel-Culture” is not the same as “cancel culture” on social media either.

    You have zero discernment and comprehension. You talk out the side of your neck.

    The contempt in your posts is easily identifiable. You pretend to care for this movement while continuing to state we should all die along with Jews for “drinking the kool-aid”, or some other perceived transgression.

    You will not detour us or demoralize us. You will not change how we think with your contemptuous posts. You are a time waster and you waste your own time more than anyone else’s….

  10. Mza9 says:

    @.

    “I’m not white, you god damned racist piece of shit.”

    Being anti-white means being anti-racist. If you actually knew anything about this movement or website as you claim you do constantly, you would know that.

    Not only are you contemptuous but you are also a liar. Which makes me wonder, what else are you lying about? You claim you are not “white”, but never do you say “whites” should die along with us and the Jews, just this movement and Jews should die, right? Wonder why that is?

    You are also a fool because you believe everyone is as dumb as you are. If you ever found the fortitude to actually attempt to dismantle this movements ideological arguments and give it a real genuine go, I would recommend you start by actually reading the website associated with this movement first, or else you will never even stand a chance. I would think this would be obvious to all our enemies?

  11. Penny For Your Thoughts says:

    @Mza9

    Thanks for clarifiying about cancel culture, however I am of the opinion that a revolutionary movement should distance itself from the mainstream and lead the trailing edges to it’s position, rather than being returned into the fold of the powers that be by the trailing edges. Using one’s own terms to describe concepts rather than enemy language (all those who are with the System are enemies until they enter the revolutionary movement and break with the system).

    If I may, I would like to ask some questions, mostly regarding the Aryanist vision of the role of a state.
    •If I am correct, the “white” identity is treated as distinct from national identities of countries of the European continent, as a transnational-ethnic identity?
    •In general, will state guidance be exercised over the means of information dissemination after the triumph of the movement, rather than allowing full free speech or purely private-corporate control over information dissemination?
    •Will persons be allowed to be ostracised by their peers alone or the state will have a say in whether a person will be formally ostracized?
    •Are the individual desires, especially those in competition with the needs and wellbeing of the state, is to be reined in and sublimated to allow the full expression of the individual personality of the leader through the state?
    •What will be the role of the state and the leader in setting the tone for the cultural direction of an Aryanist state?

  12. AS says:

    @PFYT

    “If I am correct, the “white” identity is treated as distinct from national identities of countries of the European continent, as a transnational-ethnic identity?”

    Firstly, “European continent” is a Western concept, which we do not accept, although obviously I know what you mean by it. Secondly, to answer your question, yes. If (for example) a German citizen feels closer to a generic “white” non-German than to a generic “non-white” German, that person is a “white” identitarian (whose citizenship should be removed).

    “In general, will state guidance be exercised over the means of information dissemination after the triumph of the movement, rather than allowing full free speech or purely private-corporate control over information dissemination?”

    Firstly, free speech means only that no one will be criminalized for speech. Free speech does not imply free megaphones. Secondly, comprehensive examples of speech that the state disagrees with will be deliberately exhibited in designated state-funded locations open to the public adjacent to speech that the state agrees with, so that the two can be contrasted. Private institutions can decide what speech to endorse on their private property.

    “Will persons be allowed to be ostracised by their peers alone or the state will have a say in whether a person will be formally ostracized?”

    The state can remove citizenship from individuals. This is independent from social ostracism. A non-ostracized non-citizen can still conduct private trade, but cannot use public services. An ostracized citizen can still use public services, but cannot conduct private trade with the ostracizing society.

    “Are the individual desires, especially those in competition with the needs and wellbeing of the state, is to be reined in and sublimated to allow the full expression of the individual personality of the leader through the state?”

    As National Socialists, we would prefer everyone to express their desires as spontaneously as possible*, so that we can most easily decide who is to be prohibited from reproducing (which is the most consequential way by which the individual personality of a National Socialist leader is expressed), and who is to be recruited into positions of governmental authority. What we fear are those who are highly competent in hiding their desires and pretending to be exactly what the state wants people to be, even though they are actually not. These are the ones who have the greatest potential to sabotage us.

    (* This must be balanced against our ethical duty to prevent initiation of violence. So, for example, we want people who enjoy hunting to let us know they enjoy hunting, but of course we don’t want them to actually hunt! So we would make sure hunting video games are available. (This is in contrast to communism, which would ban hunting video games if it were to believe that hunting was wrong.))

    “What will be the role of the state and the leader in setting the tone for the cultural direction of an Aryanist state?”

    The leader’s role is to carry a cultural vision (in our case, inspired by Aryan values) and communicate its characteristics to the state. The state’s role is to mold society according to these characteristics using the pre-agreed methods (in our case, National Socialist methods).

  13. . says:

    So you will judge people based on the video games they play? You’re insane. They’re games, they are not necessarily indicative of the player’s real life character. Moreso than the game they choose to play, how they choose to play it is more likely to reveal their true colours. To give an example, I have enjoyed the game ‘Friday the 13th’. What does that signify to you? Am I to be suspected of being a slasher movie villain merely waiting for my moment to strike? Or am I a teenage summer camp counsellor with a desire to be hunted by aforementioned slasher? Both playstyles are represented in the game & I have had fun with both. There are people who play like scumbags, sometimes intentionally screwing over other players or even team-killing them. I play selflessly, sometimes even sacrificing my character so others can win.

    Some of my favourite game series, like Resident Evil and Metal Gear Solid, have odd settings. Does that mean I want a zombie outbreak to happen amid some pharmaceutical corporations bioweapon plot, or for there to be nuclear weapon threats? What about classics, such as Space Invaders and Pac-Man?

  14. Penny For Your Thoughts says:

    I cannot speak authoritatively about Aryanism’s video game preference, but if I remember clearly, admin loves the 2D 8-bit classics and is not so fond of 3D games in general. Admin would be fine with Pac-Man, although the space setting of Space Invaders makes me doubt that would fly with him.

    Also thanks to admin for answering my questions. I do have follow-ups though – will the state protect citizens from being socially ostracized purely on the whim of the populace without grounds? Will the state also prevent and/or punish private corporations from endorsing speech that is subversive of the state and the vision of the leader?

  15. AS says:

    “the space setting of Space Invaders”

    I appreciate space-themed video games that highlight the ethical and other problems created by space expansionism. For example, I am Metroid fan. I only dislike works which glorify space expansionism.

    “will the state protect citizens from being socially ostracized purely on the whim of the populace without grounds?”

    We will not force anyone to socially accept anyone else. Ethically, no one owes anyone else social acceptance. Pragmatically, freedom of association helps to reveal the attitudes of people, which is useful information to the state which can then better ensure that unfair ostracizers (e.g. racists) are kept out of positions of authority.

    (As I have said in the past, I would be more than happy to allow WNs to self-segregate in “white”-only communities so that they no longer have to interact with “non-whites” (which they claim causes them so much stress). In return, I would merely demand that they do not reproduce. Of course, every WN of reproductive age would reject this offer since reducing stress is not what they really care about.)

    “Will the state also prevent and/or punish private corporations from endorsing speech that is subversive of the state and the vision of the leader?”

    As far as practically possible, no. Again, we want everyone to express how they actually feel. But if by “subversive” you mean something like planning initiated violence, then Ahimsa applies.

  16. Penny For Your Thoughts says:

    Again, thanks to admin for the clarifications, both regarding attitudes towards the space setting and my questions.

  17. . says:

    AS: ‘Again, we want everyone to express how they actually feel’

    Also AS: ‘I love Cancel Culture, and so should you’

  18. Mza9 says:

    @.

    Why would you cancel someone in regards to an issue if you don’t actually know how they feel about said issue?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>