Anti-Zionist harvest: Starbucks edition

To all those Zionist agents/useful idiots claiming to be on our side who, years ago, strongly ‘advised’ me against endorsing and liasing with BLM back when they first started gaining publicity, I am prouder than ever that I did not listen to you:

Bowing to pressure from African-American activists, Starbucks excluded the Anti-Defamation League from an upcoming daylong anti-bias training session.

The anti-bias training was prompted by the arrest of two black men at a Philadelphia Starbucks who asked to use the bathroom without making a purchase as they waited to meet a business associate. A video of the arrest went viral, prompting a public backlash and the trending hashtag #BoycottStarbucks. [Note that Starbucks has always been on the official BDS list of companies to boycott anyway. - AS]

Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson quickly apologized, calling the situation “reprehensible.” On April 17, the the company announced it would close more than 8,000 U.S. locations to conduct mandatory training to prevent racial bias, using a curriculum to be developed by leaders from a number of anti-bias groups, including Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL.

Almost immediately after the April 17 announcement, activists attacked Starbucks over the ADL’s involvement, citing the ADL’s support for Israel and its arms-length relationship to the Black Lives Matter movement.

“The ADL is CONSTANTLY attacking black and brown people,” Women’s March organizer Tamika Mallory posted on Twitter. “This is a sign that they are tone deaf and not committed to addressing the concerns of black folk.” Mallory came under fire earlier this year after attending a Feb. 25 speech by Louis Farrakhan in which the Nation of Islam leader said “the Jews have control over” the FBI.

Cat Brooks, the co-founder of the Anti Police-Terror Project, told ABC News that she agreed with Mallory, saying, “You can’t be a piece of an anti-bias training when you openly support a racist, oppressive and brutal colonization of Palestine.”

The Washington chapter of Black Lives Matter, meanwhile, tweeted that the ADL was “ultra pro-cop,” and cited a 2016 letter in which Greenblatt said “ADL has not endorsed the Black Lives Matter movement” because “a small minority of [its] leaders … supported anti-Israel — and at times anti-Semitic — positions.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/30/starbucks-adl-black-jewish-activists-511390

I know who our allies are:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/blm-bds-allied/

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-contd/

My seminal thesis that anti-Zionism belongs not to racism (as commonly presumed) but to anti-racism (an obvious logical observation considering that Zionism itself is racism), was dismissed out of hand a decade ago by those who pompously claimed to know more than I did about the subject back then. Let the present outcome be a warning to those who today think they know enough to dismiss my more recent predictions.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

116 Responses to Anti-Zionist harvest: Starbucks edition

  1. Philistine says:

    @NuminousSun

    I completely agree with all of your points. That is the core Aryanist doctrine. The only place where we disagree is in the methods we should use to prevent reproduction.

    See it my way:
    I say certain people must be prevented from reproducing.
    You say certain people must be prevented from reproducing.
    I say prevent their reproduction once, and let them live the rest of their lives in freedom (except for proven enemies, of course).
    You say prevent their reproduction in continuity by imprisoning them (but only the good people???), thereby prolonging suffering, and preventing freedom.

    From the “What Is Nobility?” page:
    “Genuine refusal to accept slavery includes not only refusal to being enslaved, but also refusal to enslaving others, and refusal to acquiesce others being enslaved.”

  2. John Johnson says:

    @SotI

    “Seperation of genders would lead to many psychological problems in the person involved, such as mistrust towards and difficulty to communicate with members of the opposite sex, social awkwardness, etc.”

    To be clear, Philistine specifically mentioned ‘concentration camps’ (i.e. places for enemies of the state), rather than the specific term ‘quarantine zone’ which we had been consistently using in our discussion, so this is where I am proposing individuals would be gender separated. Regular prisons today are already gender segregated. Who cares how sad and “awkward” a criminal may be? [Note: I personally think petty criminals can be rehabilitated in prisons, but concentration camps--places for ENEMIES OF THE STATE--are life sentences.] They have demonstrated they are unable to live in society, and it is ahimsa to prevent them from initiating more violence.

    Quarantine zones would have no need for gender separation, since they are for citizens and not criminals.

    @Philistine

    “I don’t see the difference.”

    That’s not my fault.

    “What mission could they possibly accomplish if we direct every aspect of public life?”

    Yikes, you call me insane yet you want to micromanage every aspect of life as if an NS society would be some sort of Borg mind?

    “By your own standards, he would never be quarantined (only good people need to be quarantined, of course), he would be taken to the concentration camps.”

    Saul was able to appear sincere enough that he managed to fool enough people to get half of the books of the New Testament to revolve around him. It is retrospectively obvious to all Gnostic/non-Judeo-Christians that he is an enemy, but it is too late–the damage has been done. He successfully completed his mission to sabotage Jesus’s teachings.

    “Forcefully depriving someone of social contact is the most violent thing I’ve heard. You’re even more insane than I thought.”

    Are you being forcefully deprived of contact from all humans on Earth who have no internet and therefore are unable to comment here? How can you forcefully deprive an individual of contact from another individual they do not even know exists? Besides, even if separated an individual would not necessarily be deprived of all social contact from people they know. Even prisoners in present day maximum security prisons are allowed letters (and even Rudolf Hess, victim of the most extreme isolation due to how dangerous he was, was still allowed occasional contact with people from the outside).

    As for people the prisoner knows/families being separated by this gender separation, …well this is how prisons already work in the vast bulk of the planet. Somehow I’m a dope for not wanting to sterilize everyone (which is both violent in many of the cases you are proposing and highly inefficient since it requires a medical procedure or production and distribution of pills (if there really exists a single pill that results in complete sterilization)), but gender separating concentration camp prisoners is too radical? Huh.

    Also, I look forward to seeing you protest outside of every existing prison (‘forcefully’ gender segregated), every all-male or all-female school (‘forcefully’ gender segregated), etc. Why not protest outside of men and women’s bathrooms too? Do you have a “right” to socially contact people of the opposite gender in there?

    In addition, how about the even greater violence of FORCEFUL CONTACT? Think of every child who wants to get away from their parents but can’t, every individual who is plagued by a bully or harasser, every child who is victim of a tyrannical pedagogue… Yet it’s a higher priority for you to ensure that “human filth” (your term) and enemies of the state are able to have sex?

    “You would prevent a bloodthirsty psychopath from murdering someone.”

    Prevention is only possible if such an individual has an IMMINENT INTENT TO COMMIT A CRIME. If they have no intent to commit a murder, there is no way to “prevent” them from doing so. Unless you believe in “pre-crime” and the idea that every person from ‘arbitrary group X’ will one day, with absolute certainty, become a criminal–which is what racists constantly tell me when they complain about how immigrants from the “wrong” ethnic background are merely criminals in waiting and we must therefore punish them ‘before they have a chance to commit a crime’.

    Convicting an individual of “pre-crime” is punishing SOMEONE ELSE for OUR delusions. This is initiated violence.

    How is sterilizing individuals (a proposed punishment for a crime) who have demonstrated NO INTENT to commit a crime (such as reproducing without state approval) not unnecessary initiated violence? We aren’t advocating for some 1984 government which goes about looking for “pre-crime” and sterilizes people on an arbitrary basis. Yet, I am apparently the sick and illogical one.

    “Hitler”

    If Hitler did not lose the war on account of having too much “sun” character and not enough “lightning”, the situation in the world would not have deteriorated to the point where it is today.

    It sounds like if you were in power, a Mossad agent could voluntarily sterilize himself and then effortlessly convince you he is the next Emil Maurice…

    “… by imprisoning them…and preventing freedom.”

    Imprisonment does not prevent freedom. Liberty is not freedom.

    “The free are those who reject the entire system of incentives (bribes) and disincentives (threats) by which a slavemaster exerts control. The free are those who cannot be bought. We may be prisoners, but we are yet more free than slaves, for the very need to imprison us physically implies that we have refused to bargain spiritually with the slavemaster. Freedom is not liberty, but defiance.”
    http://aryanism.net/philosophy/what-is-freedom/

    Individuals with tribalist heritage can accept the particular duty which they bear due to being the victim of their parents (under which case they are entering quarantine voluntarily and are not imprisoned); or they can defy their duty (thereby demonstrating that they refuse to fully sever all attachments to their tribal identity) and become enemies of the state. It is possible for their will to be free either way.

  3. Hypnotix says:

    @Philistine (and JJ, to some extent)

    “Forcefully depriving someone of social contact is the most violent thing I’ve heard.”

    “Sterilizing individuals before they have committed a crime (such as reproducing without permission of the state) is gratuitous violence.”

    In fact, both of these have the capacity to be equally violent, so long as they are used against someone’s will. (As is the case with everything else – it’s violence if and only if it violates someone’s will.)

    Sterilizing individuals before they have commited a crime is no worse than confining individuals for life before they have commited a crime. Both are retaliatory violence, due to the immense risk that the individual (of tribalist ancestry, but with non-tribalist phenotype) poses.

    Strategically, I’d think sterilization is preferable to confinement, simply due to the lack of risk involved – once it’s done, that particular floodgate is closed forever, whereas with confinement, you maintain a large pool of tribalist genes, ready to be set loose on the world should our regime fall prematurely due to one reason or the other.

    Ethically, perhaps it would be best to give individuals a choice, so that what happens to them is by their own will, and is therefore not even violence to begin with. If they prefer to be sterilized, they get sterilized, if they prefer lifelong confinement, then they get that.

  4. John Johnson says:

    @Hypnotix
    “Sterilizing individuals before they have commited a crime is no worse than confining individuals for life before they have commited a crime. Both are retaliatory violence,”

    In this scenario, both are INITIATED VIOLENCE because the individual being “punished” has not yet committed any act of violence or crime which can be retaliated against!!

    “due to the immense risk that the individual (of tribalist ancestry, but with non-tribalist phenotype) poses.”

    As I clarified to SotI, in my most recent comments I am primarily speaking of demonstrated tribalists (i.e. tribalist ancestry and phenotype). In other words, individuals who are GUILTY of supporting tribalism (a crime in a National Socialist state) and would be confined in concentration camps.

    Citizens of tribalist ancestry with anti-tribalist phenotype (individuals with tribalist phenotype are not qualified to become citizens) are not guilty of any crimes simply for existing, and will not be involuntarily sterilized or need to be gender separated in the quarantine zones. We will give them the benefit of the doubt that they sincerely abhor tribalism and will therefore uphold their duty not to pass on their genes–and therefore no retaliatory violence is possible and no extra-ordinary preventative measures are necessary. I imagine some may hate their ancestry so much that they get voluntarily sterilized or remain celibate, however.

    Living in the quarantine zones will not be ‘involuntary confinement’ either, as it is basically the extent an individual with tribalist ancestry must go to in order to fully “check and eliminate their privilege”, to borrow a concept. Hence, it is part of the duty an anti-tribalist individual with tribalist ancestry holds if they sincerely wish to absolutely ensure tribalism is destroyed once and for all.

    “Ethically, perhaps it would be best to give individuals a choice, so that what happens to them is by their own will, and is therefore not even violence to begin with.”

    And what if they choose neither? If the state is forcing them to pick one, it is still violence (albeit retaliatory violence, assuming only those guilty of crimes are being forced to pick).

  5. Hypnotix says:

    @JJ

    “Living in the quarantine zones will not be ‘involuntary confinement’ either, as it is basically the extent an individual with tribalist ancestry must go to”

    By the same token, sterilization need not be involuntary either. I can imagine such individuals who would prefer it to quarantine (lifelong confinement), since it is a “Do it once, never think about it again.” sort of thing, in contrast to the latter.

    “And what if they choose neither?”

    Well then they would be tribalists themselves, and would be treated accordingly.

  6. Philistine says:

    @John Johnson

    “That’s not my fault.”

    It’s your fault for not explaining how on earth putting good people in quarantine is just or fair.

    “Yikes, you call me insane yet you want to micromanage every aspect of life as if an NS society would be some sort of Borg mind?”

    Maybe if we had been there to micromanage every aspect of Christian life, Saul would have been identified and punished.

    “Saul was able to appear sincere enough that he managed to fool enough people to get half of the books of the New Testament to revolve around him. It is retrospectively obvious to all Gnostic/non-Judeo-Christians that he is an enemy, but it is too late–the damage has been done. He successfully completed his mission to sabotage Jesus’s teachings.”

    This is a different matter. Jesus never set his teachings on stone, and there wasn’t an authority on them, so it was easy for people to forget and go back to their traditionalism. I remember the site making a reference to a similar situation with Zoroaster (out of everything that he taught, his inferior followers remembered “don’t kill cows” and little else). So again, if we had been there, if we had been the authority, Saul would get nowhere.

    “gender separating concentration camp prisoners is too radical?”

    My mistake. I thought you were talking about the people in quarantine, not concentration camps.

    “Unless you believe in “pre-crime” and the idea that every person from ‘arbitrary group X’ will one day, with absolute certainty, become a criminal–which is what racists constantly tell me when they complain about how immigrants from the “wrong” ethnic background are merely criminals in waiting and we must therefore punish them ‘before they have a chance to commit a crime’.”

    But… that is exactly what YOU are implying.

    “How is sterilizing individuals (a proposed punishment for a crime) who have demonstrated NO INTENT to commit a crime (such as reproducing without state approval)”

    In which case, they don’t need to be sterilized, if they prove to be good people. Hypnotix brought up an excellent point — there were births inside concentration camps. Even if you separate them by gender, if we ever fail and they are “liberated”, they are ready to once more come out and spread their genes. Sterilize them, and we at least did some good.

    “It sounds like if you were in power, a Mossad agent could voluntarily sterilize himself and then effortlessly convince you he is the next Emil Maurice…”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Maurice

    - “Maurice led the SA stormtroopers in fights that were known to break out with other groups during those early days.”
    - “where Maurice was at the forefront of the SA unit during the fighting.”
    - “Maurice, Julius Schreck, Joseph Berchtold, and Erhard Heiden, were all members of the Stoßtrupp. On 9 November 1923 the Stoßtrupp, along with the SA and several other paramilitary units, took part in the abortive Beer Hall Putsch in Munich.”
    - ” Rudolf Hess, Maurice and other Nazi leaders were incarcerated at Landsberg Prison.”
    - “awarded the prestigious Blood Order, and been a bodyguard for Hitler”

    I wish that Mossad agent good luck in getting an “effortless” record like Emil Maurice’s.

    “Freedom is not liberty, but defiance.”

    So you want the good people you put in quarantine to be free in their confinement by defying you. You are insane and illogical.

    “Individuals with tribalist heritage can accept the particular duty which they bear due to being the victim of their parents (under which case they are entering quarantine voluntarily and are not imprisoned); or they can defy their duty (thereby demonstrating that they refuse to fully sever all attachments to their tribal identity) and become enemies of the state. It is possible for their will to be free either way.”

    Ah. You see, I’m used to getting this kind of bad-smelling insincere rhetoric from jews, but I didn’t expect it from someone like you.
    The thing is, if you force two inevitable situations on people, you take away their free will. You could add “pick your poison” in front of that and it would fit perfectly — “voluntarily” enter quarantine (which is to say, you WILL be put in quarantine), or “voluntarily” become an enemy of the state (because you could have been like Cronus and castrated your ancestor to show how much you reject that identity — you still become our ENEMY if you don’t give yourself typhoid-status).

  7. NuminousSun says:

    Indeed! So, what tribe do these “elites” this author speaks of in this article belong to? :D

    In fact, in our current culture, it’s precisely the elites who seem to be driving tribal identity and thought, and doubling down on ideological and affectional polarization.
    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/andrew-sullivan-kanye-west-and-the-question-of-freedom.html

  8. John Johnson says:

    @Hypnotix

    “I can imagine such individuals who would prefer it to quarantine (lifelong confinement)”

    Sterilization and quarantine are not mutually exclusive. Citizens of tribalist ancestry would be living in quarantine no matter what, ultimately as a way to block saboteurs (as AS and I have been explaining).

    “it is a “Do it once, never think about it again.” sort of thing, in contrast to the latter.”

    Which would mean a Mossad agent could voluntarily sterilize himself knowing that we would “never think about him again”…

    @Philistine
    “It’s your fault for not explaining how on earth putting good people in quarantine is just or fair.”

    Well, if my words in the past dozen posts haven’t been able to explain things to you, here are someone else’s.

    “To be clear, children of Jewish parents who obtain citizenship will nevertheless be QUARANTINED citizens. They can choose to live in any country within the Reich, but must live in a concentration camp within that country. I am not sure what you mean by “population centers”, but if you mean anything other than concentration camps, that is not our plan:

    Otherwise many Jews will OUTWARDLY satisfy all the conditions we demand of them just to get back into a position from which they can sabotage us.” -AS

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-starbucks-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-179068

    There’s nothing more I can offer in order to explain this to you.

    “But… that is exactly what YOU are implying.”

    Not at all.

    We are not declaring individuals guilty of the crime of being ‘future saboteurs’. (i.e. we are not punishing individuals for a “pre-crime”).

    We have determined that the only STRATEGIC way to absolutely prevent tribalist saboteurs from wreaking havoc is to ensure such saboteurs are never allowed to come into a position where they can carry out their mission. In order to ensure this, saboteurs must be prevented from having the opportunity of conning people into trusting they are anti-tribalists and thereby gaining access to key positions only available to anti-tribalists (deny access), which can most easily be done by preventing them from having the liberty of roaming society (deny proximity). Restricting the range of activism available to anti-tribalists with tribalist ancestry to solely advocating for individuals with tribalist heritage to cease from reproducing further denies saboteurs opportunities to derail things.

    All anti-tribalists have a duty to see that tribalism is destroyed. Anti-tribalists of tribalist ancestry have unique circumstances because of the fact that tribalist saboteurs would attempt to camouflage themselves amongst their ranks. (In fact, this is one of the reasons why anti-racist groups like BLM insist anti-tribalists of “white” ethnic background restrict their activism to certain topics–in order to prevent WN saboteurs from derailing the BLM movement. Of course, if we were in power, only individuals with blood relations to WNs would be required to restrict their activism; although many anti-tribalists of (non-tribalist) European heritage may find it more strategically useful to direct their activism to other sectors, since they are not acutely affected by anti-”black” tribalism).

    In order to ensure successful completion of our mission ( the destruction of tribalism), anti-tribalist individuals with tribalist ancestry find it their duty to live in quarantine in order to ensure tribalist saboteurs have zero possibility of completing their goals.

    In a military, based on their different circumstances and specialties, each unit is given different assignments and makes different sacrifices. Make no mistake, we are at war with tribalism.

    From the Government page:
    The practical structure of such a government would be a form of absolute dictatorship best described as military rule over a nation without civilians – all citizens are regarded as troops,

    “Sterilize them, and we at least did some good.”

    Perhaps, but we aim to use the least amount of labor and materials necessary to implement our plans. Sterilization increases the demand on labor and materials.

    “I wish that Mossad agent good luck in getting an “effortless” record like Emil Maurice’s.”

    If you think sabotage has never occurred in the past or that there is no reason to guard against it in the future, there is nothing more I can offer to explain to you.

    Maurice was an individual of high enough quality that I imagine he would have no problem going to a quarantine and redirecting his service to other areas if he was ordered to do so.

    “So you want the good people you put in quarantine to be free in their confinement by defying you.”

    ???

    Ultimately, we want individuals to be free by defying Yahweh and rejecting everything he has put here in order to tempt life to stay in the material realm. We are not here to enslave anyone–we are here to ensure all slavemasters, exploiters, and oppressors are destroyed once and for all.

    I don’t know why you would think that we want anyone to defy us (yet, again, I am somehow the one lacking in logic and sanity..). Individuals qualified for quarantine can either personally agree with the arguments the state makes for the duty of individuals with tribalist ancestry to live in quarantine zones; or they can personally disagree, but still honor Fuehrerprinzip and therefore still voluntarily accept their duty.

    Alternatively, they can, under their own free will, reject their duty, and choose not to go the quarantines. In this situation, they will be demonstrating that they are not loyal to the state or to the goals of anti-tribalism because they are unwilling to follow the orders which would ensure complete destruction of their tribal identity. Under which case they are tribalists and the state will use retaliatory violence to take them to concentration camps like all other tribalists. In all these cases, an individual can freely choose. In all these cases, no “good people” have defied us (nor have we ever encouraged them to). In all these cases, no initiated violence has been conducted by us. This is what genuine refusal to accept slavery looks like–ruthless application of ahimsa.

    The tribal desire to perpetuate the tribal identity for eternity and the tribalist desire to ensure a steady supply of out-group members to exploit both work towards enslavement, and so the National Socialist state aims to ensure tribalism is destroyed once and for all on our way to the bigger battle of defeating Yahweh.

    And of course, not everyone is free, as survivalists (i.e. those enslaved by the desire to stay alive) will choose whatever choice allows them the greatest probability of surviving with the greatest amount of ease. Additionally, most individuals in society today seem to have been enslaved by the desire for material luxury. Freedom is something quite rare.

    In other words, many individuals of tribalist heritage (who are not necessarily anti-tribalists!) will feel the desire to pretend to be anti-tribalists in the hopes of living a more cushy and safe life in a quarantine rather than lose liberties in a camp. The very fact that some individuals with TRIBALIST PHENOTYPE may feel the desire to “game the system” in order to go to quarantine rather than concentration camps is yet another reason why quarantines are necessary–even beyond preventing determined saboteurs.

    “The thing is, if you force two inevitable situations on people, you take away their free will.”

    Again, nothing we do takes away individuals’ free will. Freedom is something only an individual can achieve or give up, not something that can be granted or taken externally. A National Socialist state will not attempt to obtain obedience from offers of liberty (and therefore not tempt individuals to give up their freedom). All we ask is that individuals who claim to be against tribalism fulfill their duty by attacking tribalism by the means suited to their skills and circumstances, and by being loyal to the leader in his/her command in the battle against ignobility. If they REFUSE to do their duty, thereby demonstrating they are not sincere in their claim of being anti-tribalist, what is the state to do other than use retaliatory violence against them?

    Individuals are free to defy our suggestion that they go to a quarantine, under which case the state will use retaliatory violence against them. Once they get to the camps, these tribalists may still continue to hate us and attempt to defy us with all their heart. They will still be free, but deprived of liberty in a prison because they are ignoble tribalists who initiated violence against the folk by valuing their tribal identity too much to ensure it is utterly destroyed.

    And I have already gone to great lengths to state that citizens in quarantines will be deprived of as few liberties as possible (again, it is not our intent to “punish” them for existing, nor initiate violence against them by gratuitously restricting their liberties without reason).

    People don’t have the “right” to do whatever they want (which seems to be what you are trying to imply with your rhetoric). They have duties. If an individual claims to be anti-tribalist, but then refuses to do the duty they hold as an anti-tribalist, they are deserters at best. Desertion is universally recognized as dishonorable by militaries throughout time, space, and culture.

    You are conflating freedom with the liberty (“right”) to choose any choice without consequence. “Rights” are a bogus concept and will have no meaning in a NS state. A NS state would use retaliatory violence to nobly restrict the choices of those who choose to initiate violence. A noble individual’s duty to eradicate tribalism and other forms of ignobility, in addition to their loyalty to the Leader’s orders in the battle against ignobility (duty to honor Fuehrerprinzip), further mean that defying orders and choosing certain choices undermines the war effort and therefore initiates violence against all others who are fighting.

    Individuals are always free to choose to initiate violence (and this will always be true, unless society becomes totally enslaved in the Matrix or some Borg mind–which will never be the aim of a NS society), but there will be consequences as the state will always endeavor to stop initiated violence. You do not have an unrestricted “right” to choose whatever choices you want without consequences. You are not “entitled to” nor have the “right” to limitless liberty. No, this does not prevent freedom. No, this is not initiated violence by the state.

    This will be my last post to you on this matter, maybe someone else will be able to get through to you.

  9. John Johnson says:

    Another thing I forgot to add is that Maurice had the personal confidence of the leader himself, so Hitler had a chance to personally judge his quality. (However, the leader’s judgment isn’t infallible–afterall just look at how many traitors surrounded Hitler).

    Is it possible for the leader to personally judge the sincerity of every single anti-tribalist with tribalist ancestry?

  10. @AS “I am not your personal librarian. I am posting these links just to show everyone else how lazy you are. Someone too lazy to even use a search function is surely too lazy to be a useful activist, hence is wasting my time.” At the risk of being aggressively excoriated by you I must point out that in accordance with Führerprinzip and with you as our _de facto_ leader we Aryanists must look to you and other admins of this blog for leadership and guidance. Do not bluntly spurn us because we do not meet your criteria of possessing an intellect.

  11. Fatih Dion says:

    @Christian Bethel

    “Do not bluntly spurn us because we do not meet your criteria of possessing an intellect.”

    This is the real empathy and universalits attitude I have ever seen, unfortunately, rarely I see people with this advanced Aryan character, I am glad to see people like you Bethel, I hope you keep your Aryan nobility even tough you have Jewish blood

    Sieg Heil!

  12. Philistine says:

    @John Johnson

    “To be clear, children of Jewish parents who obtain citizenship will nevertheless be QUARANTINED citizens. They can choose to live in any country within the Reich, but must live in a concentration camp within that country.”

    I didn’t think it could get worse, but you just proved me wrong.

    “We are not declaring individuals guilty of the crime of being ‘future saboteurs’. (i.e. we are not punishing individuals for a “pre-crime”).”

    Yes. Yes you are. And you know it. I could substitute all of our terminology in your speech and fit in “white”, “black” and “keeping the white race pure” and it would still make sense.

    “Perhaps, but we aim to use the least amount of labor and materials necessary to implement our plans. Sterilization increases the demand on labor and materials.”

    There is no way you can argue for the strategic superiority of a concentration camp system. Hypnotix has already pointed out the biggest problem: if things go wrong, all the tribalists you contained become a threat once more, and you have done nothing to put an end to tribalism except giving it victimhood-status, thereby legitimizing it.

    “If you think sabotage has never occurred in the past or that there is no reason to guard against it in the future”

    Never said this.

    “I imagine he would have no problem going to a quarantine”

    You’re deluded. There isn’t a single person on this planet who would lower himself to the status of typhoid in recognition for his loyal service to a cause he believes in. And if there was such a person, then he has the mind of a slave.

    “I don’t know why you would think that we want anyone to defy us”
    [From your previous post]
    “Imprisonment does not prevent freedom. Liberty is not freedom.”

    “The free are those who reject the entire system of incentives (bribes) and disincentives (threats) by which a slavemaster exerts control. The free are those who cannot be bought. We may be prisoners, but we are yet more free than slaves, for the very need to imprison us physically implies that we have refused to bargain spiritually with the slavemaster. Freedom is not liberty, but defiance.

    You said this in the context of the good people you want to “quarantine”. Hence, you want them to be free by defying you.

    “Alternatively, they can, under their own free will, reject their duty, and choose not to go the quarantines.”

    My duty is to end tribalism, not going to a quarantine.

    “In other words, many individuals of tribalist heritage (who are not necessarily anti-tribalists!) will feel the desire to pretend to be anti-tribalists in the hopes of living a more cushy and safe life in a quarantine rather than lose liberties in a camp. The very fact that some individuals with TRIBALIST PHENOTYPE may feel the desire to “game the system” in order to go to quarantine rather than concentration camps is yet another reason why quarantines are necessary–even beyond preventing determined saboteurs.”

    Look, maybe I’m just too dumb to understand your reasoning, but it looks to me as if you just proved how useless these quarantines really are. Besides, you just contradicted yourself. You previously said these quarantines would be for the good people who have rejected their tribalism, proving their high quality. But now you admit survivalists in them.

    “Individuals are free to defy our suggestion that they go to a quarantine”

    I see you’re fond of bad-smelling rhetoric.

    “Once they get to the camps, these tribalists may still continue to hate us and attempt to defy us with all their heart.”

    This isn’t about tribalists, they automatically go to the concentration camps. This is about the good people who reject their identity. They might have never hated you if you didn’t compare them to typhoid. Because at this point, you’re making enemies of your allies.

    “again, it is not our intent to “punish” them for existing”

    Quarantine itself is punishment. You should put yourself in the shoes of the people you’ll quarantine. Maybe I’m proud and conceited, but I’m not typhoid, and I’m not a threat to the ideology I defend.

    “They have duties. If an individual claims to be anti-tribalist, but then refuses to do the duty they hold as an anti-tribalist, they are deserters at best.”

    My duty is to end tribalism, not going to a quarantine.

    “This will be my last post to you on this matter, maybe someone else will be able to get through to you.”

    Before you go, let me tell you what you desperately need to know: YOU WOULD NOT LAST AN HOUR IN POWER.
    I say this because you would have no support. “Big deal, we’re not a democracy”, you’ll likely say. But how many innocent’s wills can you go against before you’re left alone? Who will be your enforcers? Your police? Your army? Have you considered that they will be real people like everyone else? Can you count on their support for them and their families to be quarantined? How many of them can you put away before you have a shortage of enforcers? What will you do once you have nobody to carry out your orders? Nothing, because you’ll be dead.

    Hitler failed because he lost a war, not because he didn’t manage to keep power. All of your talk about how Mein Kampf was meant to appeal to the people’s low-quality — I suggest you consider why such a thing was necessary in the first place.

  13. John Johnson says:

    @CB

    The world has been deteriorating at a rapid rate over the past few years, which means every moment of our time is as precious as ever (the Alt-Right has basically gained control of the world’s most powerful nation ffs!!) Every moment we have idle conversations about historical minutiae, is a moment our enemies are using to organize and implement plans–while we are doing nothing to counter them.

    Over the past year, AS has had to issue warnings against blog comments devolving into historical foppery countless times, so perhaps you can understand why he is being so dismissive at the moment. We are not a book club. Real people are being murdered, deported, and having to live in constant fear from tribalists as we speak. And in the time that individuals here have been engaging in historical foppery over the past year, countless other innocent individuals have already had their lives ruined by rightists.

    The work AS and other Aryanists are doing is infinitely more important than curating a book club, and offering opinions on trivial matters which are not directly relevant to the tasks we have at hand in the present-day is a waste of time, quite frankly. There is a time and place for discussion of historical topics, but it is not now and it is not here.

    @FD
    “This is the real empathy and universalits attitude I have ever seen,”

    Every moment you or others spend having a fun conversation about history safe in your home, Zionists and far rightists are using their time to murder and torment innocent individuals. Neglecting to struggle for them because you find it more convenient or pleasurable to discuss other topics is the exact opposite of empathy.

    I don’t think the ~60 Palestinians who were murdered in the past day would say ignoring them in favor of discussing historical topics which do nothing to combat Zionism in the present-day is very empathetic.

  14. @Fatih Dion Sieg Heil, Komerad!

  15. I see. Although I completely agree with your sentiments I feel it proper to caution against this exclusion. If we want to be unified, we must be able to show support for each other so we can fight the good fight. Nonetheless you both make valid arguments.

  16. NuminousSun says:

    @Philistine:

    “Quarantine itself is punishment. You should put yourself in the shoes of the people you’ll quarantine. Maybe I’m proud and conceited, but I’m not typhoid, and I’m not a threat to the ideology I defend.”

    You clearly lack reading comprehension, perhaps who have read this site then, but were just unable to comprehend it. As I have clearly stated before I would live in quarantine zone myself; and I’m not asking or expecting other National Socialists to do the same! You even tried to debate me on this point, and then you say something like the above in a follow-up post. Which is it? You cannot have it both ways. I’m starting to feel like I’m debating a Jew in regards to you:

    “But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn’t help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as
    though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn’t remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.” — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

    “Before you go, let me tell you what you desperately need to know: YOU WOULD NOT LAST AN HOUR IN POWER.
    I say this because you would have no support. “Big deal, we’re not a democracy”, you’ll likely say. But how many innocent’s wills can you go against before you’re left alone? Who will be your enforcers? Your police? Your army? Have you considered that they will be real people like everyone else? Can you count on their support for them and their families to be quarantined? How many of them can you put away before you have a shortage of enforcers? What will you do once you have nobody to carry out your orders? Nothing, because you’ll be dead.

    Hitler failed because he lost a war, not because he didn’t manage to keep power. All of your talk about how Mein Kampf was meant to appeal to the people’s low-quality — I suggest you consider why such a thing was necessary in the first place.”

    The DAP party hat 7 members in it when Hitler joined. No majority has ever changed the world in a significant way, it has always been individual people and small groups of individual people.

    Thank you for identifying yourself as someone who is unwilling to do the right thing in-order to correct some of the huge problems innocents are born into on this planet.

  17. NuminousSun says:

    For the record: Just googled ‘NuminousSun’ for the first time in a long time, and subsequently realized that this name has many pornography uploads attributed to it in the search results. I have never uploaded pornography onto the internet.

    How come there are no porn uploads attributed to the name ‘Aryan Sanctuary’ I wonder, or would that be too obvious?

    You couldn’t make this stuff up if you wanted too…

    :D

  18. NuminousSun says:

    @Philistine:

    One last point I’d like to make in regards to you.

    When I as a National Socialist state that I am willing to voluntarily live in a quarantine zone, and not to reproduce, I’m NOT asking, or expecting, other National Socialists to do the same. If the next thought that enters your mind when I myself as an INDIVIDUAL volunteer for this DUTY is: ‘I’m no typhoid-type, I’m no threat to the ideology, I’m not living with the filth’, whilst you yourself claim to be a National Socialist, well then, YES, you are a threat to the ideology because you clearly do NOT understand National Socialism, yet you claim to be one!

    From my understanding Aryan Sanctuary (AS) and myself have volunteered for this duty, and service to the Reich.

    Your only summarized response to our volunteering for this duty has been to tell us how we are all going to fail. And then you call yourself a National Socialist to add insult to injury. Brilliant!

  19. NuminousSun says:

    …and wouldn’t ‘John Johnson’ actually be a more convincing name for a porn uploader, just saying…? :)

  20. Philistine says:

    “You even tried to debate me on this point, and then you say something like the above in a follow-up post. Which is it? You cannot have it both ways.”

    I don’t understand.

    “The DAP party hat 7 members in it when Hitler joined. No majority has ever changed the world in a significant way, it has always been individual people and small groups of individual people.”

    And I’m sure the NSDAP got the support of millions of Germans by assuring them they’d live the rest of their days in quarantine.
    THIS is why you wouldn’t last an hour in power. There’s a reason why you didn’t address my point: you would have no support.
    But if you have a miraculous workaround to this little issue, please tell me.

    “I’m NOT asking, or expecting, other National Socialists to do the same.”

    But the other person was. Can we get consistency?

    “If the next thought that enters your mind when I myself as an INDIVIDUAL volunteer for this DUTY is: ‘I’m no typhoid-type, I’m no threat to the ideology, I’m not living with the filth’, whilst you yourself claim to be a National Socialist, well then, YES, you are a threat to the ideology because you clearly do NOT understand National Socialism, yet you claim to be one!”

    I don’t understand National Socialism, sure — I must have missed the part where Hitler rewarded his supporters with quarantine, or the part where he volunteered to do his duty to go live in a concentration camp.

    If we observe things carefully, then you are the real threat to the ideology. After meticulously proving how, contrary to the way history portrays it, National Socialism can be used for good, you throw it all down the toilet with sick and impractical fantasies.

  21. NuminousSun says:

    I was just informed by another member via personnel message that I sound like I may be having ‘grandiose delusions that I’m being gaslighted’ in regards to my previous post about porn-uploader NuminousSun, which is not me.

    For the record I’d like to get this one thing clear in my regard:

    1.) Symbolically to myself I figured if anything I already laid down my life for the truth the day I signed the petition on the Whitehouse.gov petition site using my real name and address, during the early years of the Obama presidency, that the U.S. Government should tell the Americans the truth about the Israeli terrorist attack on 9/11. I figured at that time if worse came to worse and a full Zionist coup ever did take control of the U.S. federal government my name would surely make the list of persons to arrest and detain, if not worse. At that point forward I considered myself already dead, along with the other 700 plus lonely souls that signed that petition. There is nothing further anyone can do to me.

    I don’t give a fuck anymore, and that’s the fucking irony! I don’t even want to be here! LOL!!!

    2.) I do the gaslighting, I don’t get gaslighted!

    3.) No one could ever critique me worse than I can critique myself.

    4.) Considering my spiritual journey and some of the odd shit I’ve encountered on that path, no one could ever gaslight me.

    5.) Considering how bad I’ve already been gaslighted by the truth, no one could gaslight me.

    6.) What I would say ‘gaslights’ me the most on the internet is some of the stupid shit people do and say. Some of that shit leaves me cackling in the corner like a madman sometimes.
    ——

    Thoughts:

    1.) You’ve never asked me anything about myself; but you are making assumptions in my regard.

    2.) Instead of rushing to my aide as a comrade and saying something like, “maybe there’s some degenerate white nationalist or some shit throwing dirt on your username on the internet, let’s investigate further”, you asked me if I think I’m being “gaslighted”? Then you feigned concern because you saw the same-thing happen to another person, supposedly. Although one of the last things I ever heard that person say on his last youtube channel was, “sometimes you have to burn your bridges so the crazies don’t follow you”….

    3.) If throwing dirt on a username has the potential to gaslight you, perhaps you’re better off in a book club after-all?

    4.) I’m a fucking soldier ready to die for the cause, maybe it’s time for you to sack up (a better term escapes me now, but want for high-sexual dimorphism not implied.) or move on?

    *There a stormy waters ahead, jump ship now if you ain’t got the minerals…

  22. Philistine says:

    I can see why you have a swastika next to your name.

  23. NuminousSun says:

    I need to get some things of my chest. There a couple things around here that have really been bothering me for some time, and I get the feeling some others are bothered by them too. I exclude AS, JJ, Miecz, and Pandorastop, from almost everything I am about to say.

    First off I should say, everything I’ve ever written on the internet I’ve done so under the assumption that my enemies are going to read it at some point; and with any luck so will the future leaders we need. For those of you who have been offended by my bluntness, or my anger and fury, I do not apologize. I know that the leaders we need will appreciate my fury and genuine anger.

    For many of the passer-by’s here, and many others that end up here, I must say I have rarely felt a genuine anger and disgust for all things tribal and racist coming from most of you, which often makes me even question why you are even here in the first place? I’ve also noticed most of you will never comment on this blog, but have no problem chatting with each other over at the Disccord server, which I do not understand at all?

    Secondly, the reason I’m writing this is because I was confronted by another swastika-bearer over private message in regards to my post about a person on the internet using the moniker ‘NuminousSun’ to do it. (I will leave this other member nameless, if he wishes to step-forward then that is his choice. I would like to note though that I find it a bit odd that you will not confront me on this blog, which is exactly where I made the post you are referring to in your private message.) In that post I clearly stated that I’m setting the record straight, I have never uploaded porn onto the internet. Something I would hope a potential new member would read here if and when they stopped by, and perhaps googled my name. After-all, that is what we are creating here first-and-foremost on this blog right, a record of our thoughts and ideas? This particular ‘member’ stated that he was “worried” I may be going down the same path as “JAM”, and that I may be having “grandiose delusions of being gaslighted”.

    Summarizing, in closing this member then stated he wishes me the best in my pursuits, and that ‘I showed promise like JAM’. I have to say that I was personally offended by these comments. Firstly, one of the last videos of JAM I watched on his latest manifestation on Youtube was about how “You and your goofy friends, a.k.a. the Mickey Mouse Club, will not defeat the NWO”. I have to say, when I was hit by that personal message from this member the first thing that came to my mind was, “Mickey Mouse Club”. Secondly, when I recently posted the link to my last Twitter account about the possible false-flag against Muslims and Leftists by the EDL’s Tommy Robinson, you said nothing. Had you followed me then, you would have witnessed the fact that through my personal efforts I got the news outlet that printed that story to change the headline so it no-longer read that Tommy Robinson was attacked by leftists. When I recently had my latest Minds.com page up, and I got over 2,000 views on the post highlighting the connection between Jewry, Bolshevism, and the Alt-Right, you said nothing. When I received death threats for all-to-see on that same Minds.com page from Neo-Nazis, you said nothing. Then all of a sudden, after I dismantled one of your discord server buddies arguments here on the blog, you suddenly are ‘worried’ about my mental state? You do not see how this could come across as feigning concern to me? You do not see how I could possibly feel that your sudden concern is not genuine, and could possibly be masking an alternative motive?

    Furthermore, adding insult to injury, if you believe I could be suffering “grandiose delusions of being gaslighted” it tells me you haven’t paid attention to a single thing I’ve said here on the blog. Even recently stated I’m willing to live the rest of my days out in a quarantine zone as a duty and service to the Reich, does that sound like “grandiose delusions” to you, or someone who is willing to end his blood-line for a better world for future generations? I mean, just the shear level of stupidity, even around here sometimes, really doesn’t do anything for my morale, I’ll say that much.

    When I was recently working with anti-Circumcision activists on my last Twitter account, and effectively got them to target the ADL for their remarks in regards to Iceland’s circumcision ban, you said nothing….

    You are not even waging war on the same level as I am, and yet you have the gall to tell me, and JAM, that we “showed promise”? When are you actually going to show some promise yourself? Furthermore, I already know, as does AS, that my genes shouldn’t be passed on. In fact, I wouldn’t wish my genetic make-up on anyone. This world, for the most part, has been an absolute hell for me so far. I often go to sleep thinking the most introverted of thoughts, ‘I would be such a happier person if I was the only person on the planet’. Lastly, considering I have already volunteered not to reproduce, and to live out the rest of my life in a quarantine zone if needed, at the very least I’m on my way to being posthumously recognized as an ARYAN. You would know this had you bothered to read and comprehend anything I have written on this blog with in the last couple weeks alone. So, how am I not to take you telling me you think I “showed promise” as an insult? Are most of you even capable of comprehending the words and thoughts that come out of your own mouths at this point?

    Had you bothered to ask me, or read anything I’ve written here, you would know that my best hopes of being considered an Aryan are indeed posthumously. In my case, “it matters not what this paper be made of…” — Saul Williams. Did any of you bother to consider this fact while you were sniping and snipping around in the shadows wondering, ‘is this one Aryan, I don’t know, is that one Aryan?’? Which my intuition tells me is happening more than it should be….

    This member also raised the question in the private message to me along the lines of, ‘what have you ever done, besides write a book?’. I didn’t know we were keeping score? I actually have never written a book, but I did attach the Aryanism.net link to one of the first educational films I ever uploaded to the internet, which I have since disowned because of the many mistakes with in it. My intuition served me well on that one however, as it was the perfect title for the content of the film considering what certain corners of the “truth-movement” were starting to talk about at that time. If anything, perfect timing on my part in that regard. Hashtali as my witness, when I attached the link to this film it had close to 80k views: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELest_s9sI0

    How many eyes have you put the Aryanism.net link in front of? And that’s not even mentioning all the other things I’ve attached that link to. I have driven the Aryanism.net message into so many different circles at this point I’m losing track. Yet, you feel it’s your place to tell me that you feel like I once showed promise? Excuse me?

    I don’t think I have ever been gaslighted on the internet. I have however had my heart broken multiple times, and I’ve been hit with levels of stupidity and ignorance that just leave me stunned for days unable to really do anything. This is happened to me recently in fact. More and more it seems I come here just to get sorely disappointed. I’m also struggling with the fact that I’m becoming so numb sometimes I may be losing my empathy, which is the main reason I struggle in the first place. Sometimes I feel like a hollow shell that is just going through the motions now, and I have to stop and remind myself why I started down this path in the first place.

    The way I see it, anyone worth their salt who stumbles upon the truth only has one option because of who they are, that is to defend the the truth with their entire being, and to the death if need be. This is why I get furious in the face of lies.

    Where is the genuine fury and outrage from most of you? If any of you don’t think AS and JJ are furious because of their calm demeanor here, then you don’t read and comprehend them either. I have a harder time controlling my emotions than they do, because of my personality type mainly.

    In fact, there are some things AS said to me in a private message some time ago that I did not entirely and genuinely feel or understand when he said them to me then, but I am really coming to understand them now, and my respect for AS is on the increase, not decrease. I am starting to understand now. I’m starting to see the same, and feel the same. I am starting to really feel AS’s frustration.

    I honestly do NOT understand why most of you are even here at this point? This seems to have become a hobbyists hangout spot for some of you.

    Get this through your thick skulls, we don’t NEED you! National Socialism doesn’t NEED you! You either want to help the truth prevail, or you don’t! If you do not wish to help push this boulder to the top of the hill, then at the very least get the fuck out of the way, and please stop whacking us in the shines and ankles with those thorny branches, thank you! It’s getting old fast!

  24. Lucius Rhine says:

    I chose not to confront you publicly because I felt the matter was best done in private.

    Then you made it public, and misrepresented what I said, regardless of my clarification of the misunderstanding to you, once again in private.

    It is on you to take offense to what I said.

    When I said you showed promise, like JAM, I was referring to old JAM – instead of asking for clarification, you took offense.

    I never said you were being gaslighted. I have made this clear to you. Instead of accepting clarification, you took offense.

    I worked for 2 years with JAM, often deep into the night until 3AM trying to prop him up so he could actually have his voice heard. Instead he used his voice to talk about how he was being gaslighted and tried to justify incest while Donald Trump increased his support.

    I said what I did because I had a close relationship with JAM and I hoped I could form one with you. But when I contacted you over “personnel message” you asked who’s number it was. I have shown support for you in the past, in private, because that is who I am.

    Since this is your preferred method of contact, I have a story then.

    I remember you showed me a YouTube video of a certain individuals music video singing in Berlin. I started asking questions (like you accuse me of not doing) and trying to learn from you. You, in your paranoia, accused me of trying to steal contacts without any grain of proof. You have dishonored me time and time again.

    When am I going to show promise? When people quit blowing smoke up my ass and actually follow through with their commitments.

    You were there in that discord meeting with the THOR project I wanted to start. People volunteered. Where is that project now? Nowhere, because no one followed through. At the end of that call I said I was taking a short, month-long break. No such break ever occurred, because as I observed no one was doing anything. After I left discord, everyone did, and nobody did anything.

    Where was your support?

    I have been the one to initiate contact with every single person here, but no one (save for JJ) has checked up on me.

    But I continue to work. After 3 years, I’ve decided to not let anyone squander any promise that I ever show. I’m taking me and mine with me, because after all I’ve done, and all of it that has gone to waste, I can’t afford to lose any more time

    All of you have fun with the mental masturbation.

    I’m out.

  25. Fatih Dion says:

    The Jewish media PragerU now support Europe to close its border from refugees for “defending European culture and way of life”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stR5nWkq3LU

    Our strategy against Zion is right, now we must do it immediately before too late

  26. Fatih Dion says:

    If you want to give animal total freedom, (((Western Civilization))) must die

    Humanism and Judeo-Christian moral value is cruel

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JATJv8HlV8

  27. Gerulf says:

    @Fatih Dion Why are you linking up humanism with Christianity? They are nothing alike. The former emphasizes human welfare (didn’t Hitler care for his people, improving their living standards?). The latter emphasizes human superiority over nature. The former asserts the rights of man (didn’t Hitler contest that Germans had a right to assert their existence?). The latter asserts supposed privileges of man. The key difference between a humanist and a Christian is the wide gap between their sense of proportion.

  28. Sun of the Isles says:

    @FD

    I might be drifting out of the topic a bit, but what do you think of the recent terror attacks in Indonesia?

    I personally think that foul play was in the background; the attacks might be fabricated, or a false-flag, meant to cause distrust, and stir wariness against so-called “radical Islam”.

    Not long after the bombings, people wearing burqas in public have been slandered; and the public are becoming more hostile to ideas of re-forming a Caliphate. Even the government are showing some anti-Islamic tendencies.

    And now the government are going to ratify an “anti-terror Act”. Might it be all connected?

    Of course, Indonesia, having the highest Muslim population in the world, and lots of resources, as well as its strategic geographical position, is being targeted by the USA, Zionists, and neoliberals.

    Remember how they took out the Ottoman Empire? The British started it by supporting democratic, secularist and separatist movements, as well as inter-ethnic and inter-religious strife… And now the same is starting to happen in Indonesia.

  29. Fatih Dion says:

    @SotI

    “I might be drifting out of the topic a bit, but what do you think of the recent terror attacks in Indonesia?”

    It just a backlash for implementing secular democratic form of government to our country

  30. NuminousSun says:

    ‘Jew Know’ everything but Aryanism.net apparently. :D

    https://jewknowblog.wordpress.com/

  31. NuminousSun says:

    @Lucius Rhine:

    “You were there in that discord meeting with the THOR project I wanted to start. People volunteered. Where is that project now? Nowhere, because no one followed through. At the end of that call I said I was taking a short, month-long break. No such break ever occurred, because as I observed no one was doing anything. After I left discord, everyone did, and nobody did anything.

    Where was your support?”

    I told you in that Discord meeting that I would not be helping you because I have other projects I’m working on, did I not? Why then would you think I’m going to support you? I rarely ask for help, and when I do you’ll notice I’m usually very specific in regards to whom I’m asking it from.

    “When am I going to show promise? When people quit blowing smoke up my ass and actually follow through with their commitments.”

    I have never committed or promised anything to you. Sounds like you’re having a problem more-so with your own team that you assembled.

    “I remember you showed me a YouTube video of a certain individuals music video singing in Berlin. I started asking questions (like you accuse me of not doing) and trying to learn from you. You, in your paranoia, accused me of trying to steal contacts without any grain of proof. You have dishonored me time and time again.”

    I never called you, you called me. As a general rule of thumb I don’t trust most people on the internet, even less-so because of recent experiences. You don’t see how asking for other peoples contacts might make them a little paranoid, especially when they don’t know who you are personally?

    “I worked for 2 years with JAM, often deep into the night until 3AM trying to prop him up so he could actually have his voice heard. Instead he used his voice to talk about how he was being gaslighted and tried to justify incest while Donald Trump increased his support.”

    That’s between you and JAM. In JAM’s defense though he did create 9/11 Missing Links…

    “I chose not to confront you publicly because I felt the matter was best done in private.”

    Why would you assume that when I have never contacted you in private, and I made the comment you were referring to in private here on the blog in public?

    I disagree that there was any other way for me to take the comment, “You showed promise like JAM”.

    “But I continue to work. After 3 years, I’ve decided to not let anyone squander any promise that I ever show. I’m taking me and mine with me, because after all I’ve done, and all of it that has gone to waste, I can’t afford to lose any more time.”

    Well, if you haven’t shown any in the first 3 years with ‘you and yours’, what will make the next 3 years any different with ‘you and yours’ is the obvious first question that springs to my mind?

  32. NuminousSun says:

    @Lucius Rhine:

    I’ve been drawing a lot of inspiration from this song as of late, thought perhaps you may as well. Get fired up!

    Aesop Rock – Dorks
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9Y2vPD2FUc

    :)

  33. Sun of the Isles says:

    @FD

    “It just a backlash for implementing secular democratic form of government to our country”

    First of all, what “secular democratic form of government” do you mean? I don’t think that the perpertrators just blew up the church because they are fed of democracy.

    I’d rather think that the bombings are an arrangement, to weaken Muslims in general. We can see the “moderate Muslims” winning out agains the so-called “radical Muslims”, burqas are stigmatised in public, etc. Rather similar to the bombings in Europe if you ask me.

    I believe that the terrorists aren’t Muslim at all, despite their attire.

  34. Fatih Dion says:

    @SotI

    “First of all, what “secular democratic form of government” do you mean? I don’t think that the perpertrators just blew up the church because they are fed of democracy.”

    From the bombing incidents of Muslim terrorists, people would think that government-influenced religious policies would go badly, so they would demand the government not to be included in government affairs, this will cause our people to live without the direction of true and absolute morals so that our people will not agree in the same way that the state fights against the Jews, for they can think that good or bad depends on the “perspective” (too liberal)

  35. NuminousSun says:

    @AS, JJ:

    I would be interested to know what either of you think in regards to using Charles de Montesquieu quotes on the TTL site? He has many good quotes, from our perspective, in dealing with ‘liberty’. Also, he is credited as one of the founding fathers of anthropology, which I did not know before. The unfortunate thing about him is his belief in ‘separation of powers’, yet even in America where such belief is paramount in governing it is interesting to note a president can still override the judiciary and pardon an individual.

    I found these two quotes of his which I thought you may all appreciate also:

    “We should weep for men at their birth, not at their death.” — Charles de Montesquieu

    “It is not the young people that degenerate; they are not spoiled till those of mature age are already sunk into corruption.” — Charles de Montesquieu

    Interestingly on that last quote the tag words are: Young, Mature, Till

    A good one on Liberty from him:

    “We must have constantly present in our minds the difference between independence and liberty. Liberty is a right of doing whatever the laws permit, and if a citizen could do what they forbid he would no longer be possessed of liberty.” — Charles de Montesquieu

    He became even more fascinating to myself when I started reading into his Meteorological climate theory, which I can see as being even more important today than when he came up with it, and is in-line with Aryanist thought on the subject of climate as I see it?

    “Another example of Montesquieu’s anthropological thinking, outlined in The Spirit of the Laws and hinted at in Persian Letters, is his meteorological climate theory, which holds that climate may substantially influence the nature of man and his society. By placing an emphasis on environmental influences as a material condition of life, Montesquieu prefigured modern anthropology’s concern with the impact of material conditions, such as available energy sources, organized production systems, and technologies, on the growth of complex socio-cultural systems.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montesquieu

  36. NuminousSun says:

    …and this is an excellent quote:

    “The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.” — Charles de Montesquieu

  37. NuminousSun says:

    Speaking of Meteorological climate theory, more that the people currently occupying Palestine are not indigenous to the Middle-East, and are certainly not people of the sun:

    Israel’s Skin Cancer Rate Second Highest in the World
    https://www.haaretz.com/1.4718949

  38. Lucius Rhine says:

    @NuminousSun

    Alright, alright. Sick track.

    It seems the Montesquieu quotes hold a fair amount of water for us – but in the view of Americans outside the intellectual sphere how do you get that to relate to them? I doubt I am being too picky when I say I would love to sow a more authentic American culture from the cultural heroes of the late 20th century away from European influence. Are there any that share Montesquieu’s opinions or insights that may meet that criterium?
    For example, Hitler said, “He who is not willing to fight does not deserve to live.”

    And then Martin Luther King Jr. said, “If a man has not discovered something that he will die for, he isn’t fit to live.”

    Now, we can quote Hitler, or we can quote an Individual that most Americans will have better connection with. Quoting Hitler is more radical, yes. I love it. But when speaking to the masses it is completely twisted.

    Just my dos centavos. ¯\_(?)_/¯

  39. John Johnson says:

    @NS
    Also from the wikipedia page on Montesquieu:

    “Montesquieu’s philosophy of history minimized the role of individual persons and events.

    In discussing the transition from the Republic to the Empire, he suggested that if Caesar and Pompey had not worked to usurp the government of the Republic, other men would have risen in their place. The cause was not the ambition of Caesar or Pompey, but the ambition of man.”

    Perhaps it can be argued that Montesquieu is de-emphasizing the personal individual in favor of the general, de-personalized archetype (as opposed to the PC egalitarian view of arguing everyone is a perfectly equal blank slate and product of their environment, and that anyone could be an identical “hero” if they were placed in the same circumstances as a historic figure), but maybe that’s a bit of a stretch.

    “and is in-line with Aryanist thought on the subject of climate as I see it?”

    No, environmental determinism is antithetical to Aryanist ideology. We believe nobility and ignobility are innate traits, which are not fundamentally caused or altered by the environment (including both the social and natural environment). Yes, individuals can be influenced by the environment, but the basis of nobility is an innate, and hence hereditary, trait.

    But the climate theory is a big thing within WN circles. Nordicists in particular believe the harsh cold climate of hyperborea made “Nordics” strong, intelligent, etc. while warm climates made Africans and others lazy since they didn’t have to face the struggle of hypothermia or long-term planning for a long winter (crops can be grown and animals can easily be hunted year round in many tropical areas)… This idea can be found in Madison Grant’s work, for example.

    PC supporters don’t believe the meteorological climate affects people, but they do believe the cultural climate is basically responsible for our personalities–which is more or less the same principle.

    Aryans value arable land (which just so happens to correlate with certain climatic regions) since it supports our lifestyle, but simply living in a certain climate is not what caused selective pressure for nobility or ignobility. An Eskimo community which relied completely on greenhouses would face the same farming lifestyle selective pressure as a farming community at the equator. A hunting community at the equator would face a completely different selective pressure than the farming community a few miles away.

    Montesquieu’s theory as also particularly ethno-centric:

    “He goes so far as to assert that certain climates are superior to others, the temperate climate of France being ideal.”

    and generally Eurocentric:

    “His view is that people living in very warm countries are “too hot-tempered”, while those in northern countries are “icy” or “stiff”. The climate of middle Europe is therefore optimal. On this point, Montesquieu may well have been influenced by a similar pronouncement in The Histories of Herodotus, where he makes a distinction between the “ideal” temperate climate of Greece as opposed to the overly cold climate of Scythia and the overly warm climate of Egypt. This was a common belief at the time, and can also be found within the medical writings of Herodotus’ times, including the “On Airs, Waters, Places” of the Hippocratic corpus. One can find a similar statement in Germania by Tacitus, one of Montesquieu’s favorite authors.”

    I don’t know enough about Montesquieu to definitively say what ideological camp he belongs to, but it seems he is at least better than most early “Enlightenment” era philosophers, despite his flaws.

  40. NuminousSun says:

    @JJ:

    “No, environmental determinism is antithetical to Aryanist ideology. We believe nobility and ignobility are innate traits, which are not fundamentally caused or altered by the environment (including both the social and natural environment). Yes, individuals can be influenced by the environment, but the basis of nobility is an innate, and hence hereditary, trait.”

    Understood, thanks.

    “But the climate theory is a big thing within WN circles. Nordicists in particular believe the harsh cold climate of hyperborea made “Nordics” strong, intelligent, etc. while warm climates made Africans and others lazy since they didn’t have to face the struggle of hypothermia or long-term planning for a long winter (crops can be grown and animals can easily be hunted year round in many tropical areas)… This idea can be found in Madison Grant’s work, for example.”

    Good to know.

    “PC supporters don’t believe the meteorological climate affects people, but they do believe the cultural climate is basically responsible for our personalities–which is more or less the same principle.”

    “Aryans value arable land (which just so happens to correlate with certain climatic regions) since it supports our lifestyle, but simply living in a certain climate is not what caused selective pressure for nobility or ignobility. An Eskimo community which relied completely on greenhouses would face the same farming lifestyle selective pressure as a farming community at the equator. A hunting community at the equator would face a completely different selective pressure than the farming community a few miles away.”

    Good point, thanks for the reminder. I should probably read the site over for a third time. I see there’s still a few areas that I have not yet internalized and thought through fully yet.

    “I don’t know enough about Montesquieu to definitively say what ideological camp he belongs to, but it seems he is at least better than most early “Enlightenment” era philosophers, despite his flaws.”

    Considering what you’ve just said, if I do use one of his quotes it will the one about democracy, with an afterword on Montesquieu’s climate theory in a related section.

    Thanks again JJ for the excellent input.

  41. NuminousSun says:

    Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth
    Biggest analysis to date reveals huge footprint of livestock – it provides just 18% of calories but takes up 83% of farmland
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/31/avoiding-meat-and-dairy-is-single-biggest-way-to-reduce-your-impact-on-earth

  42. NuminousSun says:

    Posting this for the passer-by who is still under the illusion that only western rightists end up supporting Israel. Rightism is clearly the product of a diseased mind and soul!

    Why did Latin America stop standing up for Palestine?
    After a visible shift to the right, Latin American governments are aligning with Israel. “For Morales and Hernandez, moving their embassies to Jerusalem is not only a show of “goodwill” towards Trump, but an attempt to shift attention away from domestic troubles. It also shows a resurgence of servile subordination to US interests – something most Latin American governments had managed to overcome in the 2000s.” https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/latin-america-stop-standing-palestine-180605135948649.html

    The level of cowardice on the world stage is nauseating, as is the sickness of Rightism.

  43. Hypnotix says:

    @NuminousSun

    An issue has come up, I need to speak with you. Can you send me an email (or log into Discord)?

  44. Legion says:

    This is unrelated to the original blog post, but I figured I would mention that I just found this website mentioned on a Vice news article:
    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/evb4zw/why-so-many-white-supremacists-are-into-veganism
    “Take Aryanism.net, for example. Among all the articles devoted to the history, philosophy, and politics of white nationalism, the site has a full page dedicated to veganism. Littered with quotes from Hitler, Hess, Devi, and Joseph Goebbels, the anonymous author(s) claim that veganism is “a hallmark of an authentic National Socialist,” and “a sign of genuine empathy and a level of nobility beyond presently popular norms.”"
    “Lastly, Aryanism.net argues that white people have a genetic predisposition for veganism by reimagining a prehistoric past where Aryans were farmers who ate grains and vegetables, as opposed to the herding and meat-eating Jewish peoples.”

    Obviously the author either misunderstands what Aryanism is, or falsely labels it white nationalism as an attempt of slander.

  45. Sun of the Isles says:

    @Legion

    “Obviously the author either misunderstands what Aryanism is, or falsely labels it white nationalism as an attempt of slander.”

    Well, what do you expect from a site run by liberal Jews?

  46. @Leigon
    @Sun of the Isles

    Okay, here’s the deal…

    WTF? I’m not even an Aryanist, and to be honest, you guys are some of the best anti-racists out there. The fact that writers of the Vice article can actually put on pen the words they have written down shows one of two things:

    1) They are MUCH more akin to spreading *literal lies* than anyone before would’ve ever thought before. The writers have truly have no shame, and whatever nobility they’ve had must’ve been depleted long ago…
    You can’t really trust anyone at all, but instead have to yourself learn it all from a neutral standpoint…

    2) Most people going against Aryanism have probably never really fully read and understood the ideology before spewing nonsense about it, and they’re the only one who will face the consequences of it when they try to debate an actual Aryanist, only to lose miserably when an Aryanist points out the numerous facts and proofs that they are not racist… (It’ll be actually kind of hilarious for Aryanists to have these fools make themselves look completely clueless tbh tbh tbh tbh)

    It’ll be both scary and funny to see Aryanists have to set both the fools in the media and the public straight when they say “Oh! Aryanists are racist!”, only for said Aryanists to prove them hilariously wrong in a multitude of ways…

    “that white people have a genetic predisposition for veganism”
    JFL if you actually Aryanists have said this tbh tbh tbh tbh.

    Let’s go by their lies for a second and see how contradictory it is: If these people think that Aryanists are a part of the alt-right or some shit, then they also have to acknowledge this:

    1) Most alt-right figures and speakers actually cite veganism as a form of “weakening” of their tribe, hence veganism being bad (JFL if you think that being a tribalist is going to get you laid though, we all know it’s power for the foids to weed out the sub8′s and get WN Chad when the race wars are over, it’s basically betabuxxing but a more life-risking version of it tbh tbh tbh tbh)
    2) Popular alt-right memes (such as the soy-milk one) depict people not in the alt-right as “vegan cuck pussies” and alt-right members as “merciless (as if that’s a good thing JFL) white Aryan (incorrect term usage, but that’s how they do it so yeah) brutes favored by white femoids”, hence demoting veganism as a “weakness”. (We Incelistanis use it for a different, more justified reason, feel free to ask)

    So by Vice’s logic, Vice is wrong.

    Oh yeah, by the way, what are your guy’s opinions on the Blackpill? It’d be interesting to know Aryanist’s opinions on the Blackpill and looks theory and I was thinking about joining tbh…

    -ProudIncelistani

  47. John Johnson says:

    @ProudIncelistani
    By ‘Blackpill’ I assume you mean incel/’men’s rights’ stuff?

    We are diametrically opposed with their obsession with sex as the most important thing in life, and with the sexism and traditionalism that is so prevalent in that sphere.

    They correctly recognize that the competition of sexual selection is unfair, and that nature itself is unfair for randomly dealing us traits without our consent (many of which may be detrimental, leading to a life of above-average misery or even bullying from others). The incel response is to play the game anyway and learn to “become a Chad” or just sit around and bitterly complain about how envious and angry they are at people who aren’t inside their bubble.

    In contrast, the Aryanist response is to rebel against nature and destroy the cycle of birth altogether, and moving society away from its obsession with sex is a necessary step to achieve this.

    “As Aryanists, only sexual behaviour that involves violence (ie. reproduction and rape – in that order of priority) is worth our worry for now. (Spousal infidelity is dishonourable, but as an issue of breaking contract rather than a sexual issue in itself.) As for everything else, surely we have more pressing matters to attend to! Our task is to shift social attention away from sex and back to these matters. Sigmund Freud (Jew) portrayed sexuality as the centre of all human thought, and thus made it so in the world today. To undo this, a new centre of thought must replace the Freudian centre, in relation to which sexuality is put in perspective as a minor phenomenon. Only then will desexualization of society proceed as required. Aryanism already provides such a centre in nobility. In place of the challenge to prove one’s sexual worth, we offer the challenge of freedom. In place of slavish gladiator matches against sexual rivals (either on the individual or group level), we offer a real war against the slavemaster. In place of love denigrated to nothing more than a mental rationalization of sexual desire, we celebrate genuine romantic love capable of complete independence from sex and possibly even antithetical to it.”

    http://aryanism.net/culture/gender-issues/

    I’m not very familiar with “Looks Theory”. Could you explain in what ways it is different from the numerous mainstream scientific studies on how looks/aesthetics effect attractiveness?

    —-

    Also, I think the author of the Vice article was just lazy and didn’t even bother to read any of our pages. It takes like 3 seconds of reading any of our articles to see that our ‘pages about white nationalism’ are pages explicitly and ruthlessly condemning white nationalism, and therefore the author probably would have used better arguments if she was intentionally trying to lie about our positions.

    When the Vice article was first published, this post was on the front page of our blog:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/heather-heyer-rip/

    So much for us being Alt-Right WNs, lol..

  48. @JJ

    “We are diametrically opposed with their obsession with sex as the most important thing in life, and with the sexism and traditionalism that is so prevalent in that sphere.”
    It’s a controlling force foids use to use the tribe to their advantage. We acknowledge it. You can’t say that “sex isn’t important”, especially how much of a great tool it is for foids to control others.

    You also must acknowledge the importance of sex (not reproducing, wouldn’t wish these disgusting genes on anyone) in strong genuine romantic relationships where fidelity remains. You can’t go without it.

    “sexism and traditionalism that is so prevalent in that sphere”
    If a jew told you “I’m opposed to the anti-semitism in Palestine”, what would you reply?

    I’m a proud misogynist and don’t deny it. I’m a proud Palestine supporter and I don’t deny it.

    “The incel response is to play the game anyway and learn to “become a Chad” or just sit around and bitterly complain about how envious and angry they are at people who aren’t inside their bubble.”
    Here I both agree and disagree with you sharply:

    Agree:
    “play the game anyway and learn to “become a Chad””
    I’m against fakecels who think they can they can “ascend” and forget the Blackpill, and all of the sudden they think that the Blackpill is no longer true. It’s like, seriously?! You were so enlightened, and now, just because some whore offered her roast flaps to you, you forget it all?! Also, you’re either born a Chad or you’re not. Stop coping and fight for what’s right.

    Disagree:
    “bitterly complain about how envious and angry they are at people who aren’t inside their bubble.”
    Anger is a correct response to injustice. Both ways you look at it, and both ways we are justified:

    1) If foids are in control of sexual selection, then they should be blamed for this catastrophe, that they divide and conquer so.

    2) If foids are NOT in control of sexual selection, then we’ll handle them like the jews.

    “In contrast, the Aryanist response is to rebel against nature and destroy the cycle of birth altogether, and moving society away from its obsession with sex is a necessary step to achieve this.”
    The only way is goal then is INCELISTAN! INCELISTAN ZINDABAD! Until the foids live every moments of their lives in an eternal hell in suffering never before thought physically possible, where the Incelistani man no longer faces persecution, you won’t ever see such a goal.

    “I’m not very familiar with “Looks Theory”. Could you explain in what ways it is different from the numerous mainstream scientific studies on how looks/aesthetics effect attractiveness?”
    Looks Theory is just the fact that Looks matter for women in relationships of all sorts, as well as what is handsome and ugly. While it is true that the Oval face is the most Aryan, it is also the most hideous to women. For women, the Aryan face is the greatest crime of all (besides not being light skinned and short) and a true monstrosity. They prefer masculine, brutish, gentile, square faces. Women must be exterminated.

    “When the Vice article was first published, this post was on the front page of our blog:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/heather-heyer-rip/

    So much for us being Alt-Right WNs, lol..”
    Holy shit, Vice really IS blind. They can’t just spend a second to actually look around before saying “Aryan?! U meen liek h’white???///???”. Truly Shameless.

  49. Philistine says:

    @ProudIncelistani

    You have a completely misconceived view of the world. “Foids”? “Chad”? Stop frequenting those circles and you’ll see your life improve in an instant.

    “You can’t say that “sex isn’t important”, especially how much of a great tool it is for foids to control others.”

    “Foids” don’t have a conspiracy to control the world through sex. This is as ridiculous as islamophobes saying that Muslims have a secret plot to conquer the world. Also, consider the type of person who lets themselves be controlled by sex. For all the incels’ talk, it’s them who are weak-willed enough to have their whole lives dependent on it. It’s pathetic and disgusting.

    “You also must acknowledge the importance of sex (not reproducing, wouldn’t wish these disgusting genes on anyone) in strong genuine romantic relationships where fidelity remains. You can’t go without it.”

    You don’t sound like a loving person to me. But since this is so important to you, investigate this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_love
    (Personal example: I never had any sexual feelings towards the one person I can claim to have loved in my whole life. Carnal attraction, like all things physical, is ephemeral. The metaphysical attraction between two souls, like all things spiritual, is eternal. It is what matters most.)

    “I’m a proud misogynist and don’t deny it. I’m a proud Palestine supporter and I don’t deny it.”

    Misogyny is tribalism. Anti-Zionism is anti-tribalism. You have to decide what you really are. Distance yourself from your worldview like I told you, and you’ll do the right thing.

    “You were so enlightened, and now, just because some whore offered her roast flaps to you, you forget it all?!”

    Nihilism isn’t enlightenment. And those people “forget it all” precisely because they are of poor quality, weak-willed enough to have their whole lives dependent on sex.

    “Anger is a correct response to injustice.”

    Where is the injustice? The Palestinians, just like every other oppressed people on earth, are entitled to free and peaceful lives, away from colonizers. I’d expect them to be angry when foreigners establish their unrighteous and sinful way of life in their homeland while managing to convince the rest of the world that what they’re doing is good.
    Compared to this, what injustice have incels suffered? Not having inserted their organ into a woman’s organ? God forgive me for saying this, but if it matters so much to them, why don’t they just visit a prostitute and get on with more important things?

    “The only way is goal then is INCELISTAN! INCELISTAN ZINDABAD! Until the foids live every moments of their lives in an eternal hell in suffering never before thought physically possible, where the Incelistani man no longer faces persecution, you won’t ever see such a goal.”

    If incels weren’t so bitter and insufferable over nothing, they wouldn’t “face persecution.”

    “Looks Theory is just the fact that Looks matter for women in relationships of all sorts, as well as what is handsome and ugly. While it is true that the Oval face is the most Aryan, it is also the most hideous to women. For women, the Aryan face is the greatest crime of all (besides not being light skinned and short) and a true monstrosity. They prefer masculine, brutish, gentile, square faces.”

    Do you see the misconception yet? Real life isn’t the Conan universe. Take a look at any of the examples here: http://aryanism.net/culture/aesthetics/human-beauty/
    Aren’t all of them “Chads”?

    “Women must be exterminated.”

    So then you’d form the “romantic relationships” you so long for with men. By incel logic, incels are wrong.

    You’ve been banned from the chat server because of garbage like this, so don’t bring it over to the blog. If you won’t change, then go back to the rest of the incel clowns and commiserate with them for the rest of your life.

  50. youarezionists says:

    Why are on wordpress owned by Matt Mullenweg (jew)?

    https://sanfranciscoajc.wordpress.com/tag/matt-mullenweg/

    Part of the biggest zionists in the world?

    https://www.ajc.org

    Why do you support refugees whom almost exclusively arrive via jewish owned NGOs that promote the perpetuation of human trafficking of naive, desperate & fearful people, democracy and further debt into slavery and usury?
    You believe in genetic quality but promote criminality?
    Don’t deny crime hasn’t risen everywhere
    this has occured… And are you honestly proposing that these countries that have been shipped full of people who are on welfare for years and years, (humans are unable to spontaneously assimilate you know) are a qualitative addition to the genepools development?

    Please explain…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>