Anti-Zionist harvest: Bundestag edition

The mass-circulation Bild paper blasted the German parliament on Friday for its condemnation of the Jewish state for seeking to exercise sovereignty over disputed parts of the West Bank.

The Bundestag resolution was unanimously supported by German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s coalition government of the Christian Democratic Union, Christian Social Union, and Social Democratic party. The Free Democratic Party also joined the anti-Israel resolution while the Left party and the Green party sought tougher measures against the Jewish state.

Not bad, huh? Best of all, the more leftist the party, the more strongly anti-Israel it is, in line with our advocacy. Which is not to say we have triumphed, on the contrary:

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, told The Jerusalem Post that the “Bundestag will add its united voice-minus a far right party- to express grave concerns over any extension of Israeli sovereignty.

The far-right party Cooper referenced is the Alternative for Germany party that did not vote for the anti-Israel resolution.

More details:

Representing the AfD at the debate, Friesen said at the podium: “Now, we can stand off to one side, shouting, ‘bad, bad, bad!’—the kindergarten style of international affairs we have come to expect from Germany, the world power of hyper-moralizing—or we can accompany this process reasonably and rationally, giving new initiatives the chance they deserve, possibly as part of a Middle East Peace Conference, as the Alternative for Germany supports.”

In May 2019, the Bundestag passed a resolution that deemed the BDS movement an anti-Semitic endeavor to the applause of the Israeli government. In December 2019, it voted to ban Hezbollah. (Both motions came on the heels of AfD’s more strident, rejected versions against BDS and Hezbollah.)

Enemy commentary:

Years back Germany flooded in large numbers of Muslim Turks to fill jobs, and Angie has been kissing Turk butt ever since.

She has now identified herself as the true “Turkish whore” she is. German Nationals need to sell her to Turkey for the turk whore she is.

I hope Israel takes and occupies all of Turkey, and only gives some back after Kosovo is returned to Serbia whom it was wrongfully taken from.

Kosovo is Serbia you Turk Whore, Merkel.

Serbian and Hungarian Knights fought against the Muslim Turk in asion at the Battle of Kosovo Plains, this is part of Serb identity, and thanks to these people, and the Franks in France fighting against the invading Muslim hoardes we are not muslum today. Serbs were seriously wronged during WWII, the largest concentration camp was located in Croatia, strange no one is aware of it, but it was for killing Serbian Christians who were rounded up by “Muslim SS” Yes, Hitler allowed a Muslum SS Unit to form, and it was to exterminate Serb Christian’s. So it wasn’t just once, but twice these people were wronged, when they were wrongfully attacked by “NATO” These people, along with Eastern Europe, stood against the invasion of Europe, and we owe them our gratitude for our not being muslim. It was wrong to attack these people, and even even a greater wrong to them to take their identity, Kosovo, from them, where we all have ties to, I thank Serbia for fighting against the invading hoardes, and I thank you for my not being muslim today.

Those coward Politicians like Merkel kissing Muslim butt crack and turning their back on Europeans is what led to Serbia being wrongfully attacked, and Kosovo taken away, and this wrong must be corrected, and it can only be partially corrected by Kosovo being returned. The wrongful attack against Serbia can never be undone.

When even Stormfront is bashing Hitler, you know we have been successful in reclaiming him as a leftist. When Bill Clinton admirably bombed Serbia (which our enemies also mention above, and which repeatedly I have held up as the template for all future American foreign policy), he was merely being a subconscious Hitlerist. (Which fits, as Clinton’s hero was JFK and we already know who JFK’s hero was.) The logical next step would have been bombing Israel, which is why Israel had to do the 9/11 false flag to disrupt the psychopolitical flow.

Anyway, my warnings all along about the AfD remain more valid than ever. AfD must be totally eradicated, indeed all identifiable descendants of AfD supporters should be prohibited from the state from reproducing. Remember, National Socialism is best understood (and most efficiently explained to newcomers) simply as genetic Cancel Culture:

“A general worldview will never share its place with something else. Therefore it can never agree to collaborate in any order of things that it condemns. On the contrary it feels obliged to employ every means in fighting against the old order and the whole world of ideas belonging to that order and prepare the way for its destruction.” – Adolf Hitler

The above Woke quote defends precisely the present-day Cancel Culture attitude that rightists unanimously condemn. The difference, however, is that National Socialism moreover understands that destroying the old order has to be done on the genetic level in order to last long enough to matter:

“The leadership of our National Socialist state and our conception of a folk is penetrated and inspired by foundations in biology. Legal provisions are derived from the laws of life. Their worth proceeds from the degree to which they are thought through in biological terms and on biological foundations.” – Walter Greit

Toppling racist statues (as we have enjoyed seeing much of over the last month) is undoubtedly a positive symbolic gesture, but it is the much harder and more serious work of terminating racist bloodlines – which BLM (for all its numerous other merits) has not even started to so much as theoretically discuss yet – that is needed for true victory. In Germany, this should obviously start with AfD bloodlines.

By the way, our forum is now here following ProBoards’ deplatforming of our old forum:

Content is still in the process of being restored, therefore please bear with us.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Anti-Zionist harvest: Bundestag edition

  1. RP says:

    “he was merely being a subconscious Hitlerist”
    A “Hitlerist” who had sexual relations with a Jewess?

  2. AS says:

    We are discussing policy:

    Hitler issued instructions for the dismemberment of the country, entitled the “Temporary Guidelines for Division of Yugoslavia”. These instructions directed that what Hitler considered to be Alt Serbien (Old Serbia, meaning the territory of the Kingdom of Serbia prior to the Balkan Wars), would be placed under German occupation. This decision reflected the anger Hitler felt against Serbs, who he saw as the main instigators of the Belgrade military coup of 27 March 1941 which brought down the Yugoslav government that had acceded to the Tripartite Pact two days earlier. The general approach Hitler took in these instructions was to ensure that Serbia was punished by being reduced to a “rump”.[126]

    This is the kind of attitude we need to get back to.

    Even the Serbs themselves frequently compare Clinton to Hitler:

  3. . says:

    If cancel culture is okay why have you attempted to set up the trueleft forum again? You were cancelled by proboards. Is this more of your typical bs, where deplatforming is fine so long as you do it or at least aren’t affected by it?

    As for Clinton being a subconscious Hitlerist. You should enter the olympics next year, you’ll take gold in mental gymnastics. Bombing israel is not a logical next step from attacking Serbia. Israel is far and away the much greater priority to target. Nuke jews first, that is the logical move. Not some ‘world police’ action in the Balkans that does fuck all to israel’s standing.

  4. RP says:

    “Even the Serbs themselves frequently compare Clinton to Hitler:”
    As do the Duginist infiltrators in the False Left, who (rightly) claim that any anti-Eastern European sentiment is comparable to Hitler, but they (wrongly) attribute this to Eurocentric racism from Anglos.

    “When even Stormfront is bashing Hitler, you know we have been successful in reclaiming him as a leftist.”
    Almost successful. Some “Third Positionist” Duginists still claim Hitler as theirs so as to distance themselves from the aforementioned fake Anglo National Socialism, but still retain their pro-Serbia views.

  5. AS says:

    “(wrongly) attribute this to Eurocentric racism from Anglos.”

    Would a Eurocentrist grant Most Favoured Nation status to China (as Clinton did)?

    To say nothing of what has become Clinton’s most famous speech (thanks to post-9/11 rightist critical publicity):

    In 1998, President Bill Clinton, in a now-famous address to students at Portland State University, remarked:

    Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years, there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time … [These immigrants] are energizing our culture and broadening our vision of the world. They are renewing our most basic values and reminding us all of what it truly means to be American.

    Revisiting the president’s speech in his 2001 book, The Death of the West, Buchanan wrote: “Mr. Clinton assured us that it will be a better America when we are all minorities and realize true ‘diversity.’ Well, those students [at Portland State] are going to find out, for they will spend their golden years in a Third World America.”

    During Bill Clinton’s address to the 1998 graduation class of Portland State University, he told them that their children and grandchildren would inhabit a country that “In little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time….”

    This episode is astonishing. Here was a president of the United States telling a largely white student body the day is coming when their own kind will cease to be the majority in a country where the majority rules. Most peoples would sit in stunned silence at such a revelation, or rise in rage at the prospect. The Portland State students cheered the news of the coming minority status to which they and their children have been consigned by their government.

    (How I miss the 90s…..)

  6. RP says:

    “Would a Eurocentrist grant Most Favoured Nation status to China ”

    Exactly. But the False Leftist Duginists (such as Stephen Cohen (Jew)) primarily target present day anti-Russia sentiment, which they attribute to Eurocentrism. This may be true of the Ukrainian neo-nazis supported by the United States, but it is not true of the broader American consciousness since the Eurocentric (and thus Western) rightists are pro-Russia, whereas the American (and thus anti-Western) leftists (being anti-rightist) are necessarily anti-Russia.

    Therefore, the True Left, which is opposed to White Nationalism (not just “Nazism”), has no problem with targeting Russia, as their opposition to it is anti-Eurocentric (just as Hitler’s was!) and hopefully will understand that Hitler was on their side.

    Also, regarding Clinton being pro-China, it is worth noting that Carter was also pro-China, and was no coincidence one of the few presidents critical of Israel. However, it is unclear whether their pro-China sentiments are a result of wanting to create economic interdependence (globalism) or true fellowship. Rightists consistently point out the former as evidence of the globalists being pro-China, thereby categorizing all pro-China sentiment as “globalist”.

  7. AS says:

    “all pro-China sentiment as “globalist”.”

    But they claimed the anti-China TPP was “globalist” also!

    On the other hand, the colonial era they do not regard as “globalist” despite it being responsible for creating multiregional economic dependence for the first time, because “whites” (including Jews) were then the ones in unilateral control of the supply lines.

    Basically, in their worldview, “whites” being able to initiate starvation siege on “non-whites” at will is “modernity” (which “non-whites” should thank “whites” for), but “non-whites” being able to retaliate in the same way is “globalism” (which “whites” should react towards as outlined in The Turner Diaries).


    Carter also wanted to withdraw all US troops from South Korea. On this account I believe he was sincere towards China. If only he had succeeded, Korea might have reunified by now.

  8. RP says:

    “On this account I believe he was sincere towards China.”

    Ok, but his advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski (Jew?), the key figure behind the “Chimerica” concept, is definitely not sincere.

  9. Mza9 says:

    From a China Traveler by David Rockefeller:
    The social experiment in China under. Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history. How extensively China opens up and how the world interprets and reacts to the social innovations and life styles she has developed is certain to have a profound impact on the future of many nations.

  10. AS says:


    Chimerica is not tied to any one ideology, but should be viewed a tool that many competing ideologies seek to use to further their respective ends. Capitalists look solely at its potential for lowering costs of production and opening new markets; neocons/Freemasons see it as a route towards democratizing China; old-school Duginists see it as a route towards breaking up both China and the US; whereas we see it as a route towards exporting autocracy and policies such as state control over reproduction to more countries (including the US), as well as of course to form an anti-Duginist front. I am sure our pro-Chimerica rivals are as sincere as we are: we just differ in what each of us wants Chimerica to do for us! Nevertheless we agree that it is a gamble better taken than not taken.

  11. RP says:

    “Nevertheless we agree that it is a gamble better taken than not taken.”

    Okay, but the only thing I am concerned about is why the False Leftist Jews I mentioned earlier on ProBoards (Max Blumenthal, Alex Rubinstein, Dan Cohen), who are anti-capitalist, anti-neocon, and anti-balkanization would be even outwardly pro-China, if not because of globalism. Are they perhaps trying to resurrect old school Maoism?

  12. AS says:

    Jews infiltrate every camp in the spectrum at an early stage in order to be ready to steer it in favour of Jewish interests as needed, without needing to have a fixed route in mind prior to infiltration. This is the classic Zionist modus operandi.

    The Jews you mentioned are merely building their pro-China resumes that they can present as their credentials for being taken seriously when they talk to sincere pro-China people in future. In all likelihood they don’t yet know exactly what they will talk about (which will depend on how world events unfold); what matters to them is that whatever it is they eventually end up talking about, their audiences will lap it up. This goes back to what Hitler said about Jewish anti-idealistic pragmatism. Idealists decide what idea to promote first, and then worry about how to best influence people on that particular idea. Pragmatists concentrate on becoming influential first, and then decide what to do with their influence.

  13. Fuck Dugin says:

    “This may be true of the Ukrainian neo-nazis supported by the United States”

    Hahaha, no. Leading figures of the Ukrainian far-right include Sergey Korotkikh (ethnic Russian, born in Russia, tied to the FSB), Roman Zheleznov (ethnic Russian, born in Russia, tied to the FSB), Olena Semenyaka (former associate of Dugin) and Eduard Yurchenko (former member of the pro-Russian Party of Regions, used to promote something along the lines of the “triune Russian nation” until fairly recently).

    Just like some Jews are trying to build up their pro-China resumes to subvert any initiatives including China later on, the far-right in Ukraine is trying to build up their pro-Ukraine resume now in order to subvert Ukraine later on. Anti-Russian sentiment has been a key ingredient in Ukrainian nationalism from its early, left-leaning days, and rightfully so. The modern-day Ukrainian far-right has not only nothing to do with it, but is in fact an offshoot of Russia’s very own far-right scene.

  14. Fuck Dugin says:

    Also @RP

    “Ok, but his advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski (Jew?), the key figure behind the “Chimerica” concept, is definitely not sincere.”

    May I ask why you doubt Brzezinski’s sincerity?

    Besides normalizing relations between the US and China, he armed the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviets (thus creating another precedent for American-Islamic cooperation in addition to the bombing of Serbia). As far as I know, he has also been rather critical about US-support for Israel (at least during the Bush years) and was generally disliked by American Jewry. Based on these facts, he doesn’t strike me as the worst guy.

  15. Mza9 says:

    People often take Brzezinski out of context because of that We Are Change video clip of him talking about the NWO. If you listen more carefully it actually comes across more as a warning….

    We should not forget Brzezinski advised president Carter, Carter being a very vocal advocate for the Palestinian cause, at the least moreso than any president before or since.

    Then I just found this interesting little piece while looking for Z.Big’s NWO “admission”:

    Russian Media Falsely Attributes a Conspiracy Quote to Zbigniew Brzezinski
    the news portal linked to Zakhar Prilepin, a famous Russian novelist and a right-wing radical, attributed to Zbigniew Brzezinski the following

    Let us also not forget Luke Ridkowski of ‘We Are Change’ fame actually is Jewish himself….

  16. Mza9 says:

    A little of topic:

    One of the only ‘We Are Change’ interviews worth watching is when they question David Rothschild. at the end of the clip when they approach him and start questioning him he goes off on this whole “reptilian alien” spiel, which damn near links the Rothschild family to the whole “Flat Earther” conspiracy theory.

    Look at the opening images to the Netflix documentary “Behind The Curve” where the narrator talks about making a “poop sandwich”, look at the books on the shelves. One of those books is not like the others. Did the Rothschild family fund that documentary?

    We Are Change confronts David de Rothschild
    We are change San Francisco confronts David Mayer de Rothschild before he embarks on Plastiki. This is all the footage from the confrontation including most of the conversation outside without music

  17. Mza9 says:

    Just found the image from the book shelf used in the documentary I was mentioning above. From left to right the titles read: (Remember the narrator is talking about conspiracy theories and making a “poop sandwich” while the book shelf image is on screen).

    “9/11 Controlled Demolition”
    “Area 51″
    “Denver Airport”
    “Lizard People”
    “Flat Earth”

    Told ya, one of those is not like the others….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>