We now have Amnesty International on our side:
The panel was to discuss the role of the UN human rights council in Israel, and included a speaker from UN Watch, an organisation that is highly critical of UN policies on Israel’s 50-year occupation of Palestinian territories and claims the global body is biased against Israel.
…
On Friday Amnesty wrote to the JLC saying it was “currently campaigning for all governments around the world to ban the import of goods produced in the illegal Israeli settlements. We do not, therefore, think it appropriate for Amnesty International to host an event by those actively supporting such settlements.”
…
Jonathan Goldstein, the JLC’s chairman, said Amnesty’s decision was disgraceful. “By withdrawing their offer to host an event on the role of the UN human rights council, it is clear that Amnesty International UK’s claim ‘to protect freedom of expression’ is only on their terms,” he said.
The next step for Amnesty International is to ditch the very concept of “human rights” (False Left) and rework its entire ideology in terms of Ahimsa (True Left) instead. We of course would be happy to offer their staff our expert consultancy in such a project.
In other news, our enemies remind us once again why our demographic approach is the correct one:
http://gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/in-austria-hostility-to-israel-is-the-problem/
Anti-Semitism’s profile has changed now: Jew-hostile manifestations are Israel-connected. Accordingly, I see the chief danger for Jews in the explosive growth of Jew-hatred among European Muslims.
…
In Austria too, at demonstrations and soccer games, Muslim young people shout “Annihilate Israel, slaughter the Jews!” In the summer of 2017, there was a demonstration of Muslim women in front of the Opera, supported by the socialist youth movement. A speaker called stridently for the destruction of the state of Israel, so that the Palestinian state could emerge.
The present problems for Jews will come from Israel-connected hostility to Jews and concomitant manifestations of anti-Semitism. What must be done today is to prevent the beginnings and not close our eyes to the creeping Islamization of Europe and the dangers it brings with it. Only then can security be created for Europe’s Jews. I believe that the present Austrian government has recognized this danger and should be fully and completely respected by Austrian Jews.
To the remaining (and fortunately shrinking) False Left everywhere: it is well past time for you to concede that your ideology is untenable. Jews are not victims, but part of Western civilization, thus our enemy! Switch to the True Left today!
@Everyone
“Jonathan Goldstein, the JLC’s chairman, said Amnesty’s decision was disgraceful. “By withdrawing their offer to host an event on the role of the UN human rights council, it is clear that Amnesty International UK’s claim ‘to protect freedom of expression’ is only on their terms,” he said.
Read that a few times and think about it. The Jew truly does speak with a forked tongue.
Let’s also hope Israel keeps being Israel and more and more Muslims come our way…
https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/7u2quh/iceland_mps_propose_a_ban_on_circumcision_of_boys/?st=jd2i6bzh&sh=9049f4da
Why wait until to circumcised muslim refugees come to you, why not go to them? For example there is no need to wait for them to make the arduous journey all the way to your country in the West, to support them and “welcome” them, one should make the pilgrimage to their country and greet them there that would make it easier on them, and would you not want to make it easier on them? Seeming you support them. Why make them travel all the way to where you are? Now you might say that there is violence there in the countries where the circumcised (what is the stance of Aryanism.net on male circumcision, by the way?) muslim refugees are coming from, and you will probably say that the violence and or poverty is cause somehow by the West, then if that is the case why would you want to invite them to the West which has caused the violence and the poverty in their own countries?
@Amaleq
My vision is on the distant horizon (our enemies doing our blogging for us):
http://gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/halal-vegan-same-thing/
@Otto
“Why wait until to circumcised muslim refugees come to you, why not go to them? For example there is no need to wait for them to make the arduous journey all the way to your country in the West, to support them and “welcome” them, one should make the pilgrimage to their country and greet them there that would make it easier on them, and would you not want to make it easier on them? Seeming you support them. Why make them travel all the way to where you are?”
Because they want to come. (Duh!) We are not making anyone travel anywhere; we simply believe everyone should be ALLOWED to travel to whichever country they themselves want to live in. What is so difficult to understand about this?
“(what is the stance of Aryanism.net on male circumcision, by the way?)”
Same principle. People who themselves want circumcision should be allowed to have circumcision. People who themselves do not want circumcision should be allowed to not have circumcision. Parents who decide on infants’ behalf to circumcize them should be flayed alive as painfully as possible.
“you will probably say that the violence and or poverty is cause somehow by the West, then if that is the case why would you want to invite them to the West which has caused the violence and the poverty in their own countries?”
people living in any country which is within target range of another country’s WMDs, but which itself is not equipped with WMDs sufficient to launch a matching counterstrike, are automatically justified in moving into the WMD-armed country as a self-defence measure, no differently than how if someone from across the room points a loaded gun at you (who are unarmed) and you run towards him to grab the gun, you are not attacking him but only defending yourself; if the gunman is injured as a result, it is entirely his fault for pointing the gun at you in the first place.
http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/immigration/
And hopefully with the demographic shift, the West will eventually cease to be the West.
@Otto
“why not go to them? ”
“one should make the pilgrimage to their country and greet them there”
There are already aids to and volunteers in war-stricken countries, from all over the world, but no matter how much volunteers are present in such countries it will take months, even years, for infrastructure to be rebuild, so that some of such countries’ population might remain homeless and jobless in the meantime.
“Why make them travel all the way to where you are?”
We are not making refugees travel all the way we are, they are coming to our countries of their own accord. One thing we can do, though, is to ease the process through which the refugees can come to our countries (e.g. providing naval military protection for refugees crossing the sea) and be admitted as a naturalised citizen, and while waiting for their citizenship to be approved, offer them protection from thugs (especially far-right ones).
“what is the stance of Aryanism.net on male circumcision, by the way?”
I think that this site believes that circumcision is a matter of consent, though I am not an authority on Aryanism (I shall wait for a member with a swastika logo to confirm this).
“why would you want to invite them to the West which has caused the violence and the poverty in their own countries?”
The West (partly) caused the violence and poverty in their own countries, so one way the West can compensate for this damage is to offer people from this countries accommodation, protection, and work.
@Otto:
Why wait until to circumcised muslim refugees come to you, why not go to them?
I intend to. Working on the finances for it currently.
Why make them travel all the way to where you are?
I’m not making them travel anywhere, nor would I ever make anyone travel anywhere they did not want to. Apparently you would though?
and you will probably say that the violence and or poverty is cause somehow by the West
You’re right, I would. And so would Hitler and the NSDAP
Hitler Speaks on the Plight of Palestine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNE92gsL0Hc
Had it not been for the creation of Israel, and the ongoing “Greater Israel” project, a western colonial project, many of the people of the middle-east would not have become refugees in the first place. Are you disagreeing with people like former CIA-Operations Chief Michael Scheuer, and numerous others, that America and Israel ARE the problem in the middle-east? Please give a valid and well thought out argument if you are going to do so, unless of course you do not want me to take you seriously….
would you want to invite them to the West which has caused the violence and the poverty in their own countries?
Yes, of course. It is the least the western countries could do for the many thousands of people they have made homeless and destitute in the middle-east, and the global south in general.
“(what is the stance of Aryanism.net on male circumcision, by the way?)”
“Parents who decide on infants’ behalf to circumcise them should be flayed alive as painfully as possible.” – AS
Indeed. I think being skinned alive would be an adequate punishment too. Starting at the head and peeling downward of course.
@AS:
“My vision is on the distant horizon (our enemies doing our blogging for us):”
http://gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/halal-vegan-same-thing/
LOL! Oh my, that’s great!
But why would the Refugees want to come to the West, if indeed it is the West that has caused their misery? And I think the West is a miserable place and deserves its inevitable fate, but so does the East. There are many places in the East that are just as wealthy if not more so now than the West? These places are just as Western now as the West itself? Which is another issue. I mean, with the East being now quite Westernized with the advent of Globalization, which I acknowledge was begun by the West itself. It is of course the West itself that is providing much of the means and logistical aid for the transfer of immigrants and refugees, but personally I don’t see how this will be of benefit to the immigrants and refugees, or the people of the countries in which they are arriving in. And in the case of say the Syrian Refugees, and I suspect this is the case for all other refugees and immigrants is that they are widely dispersed, and are being distributed to many different countries, both in the West and East…. I think most are in Turkey at the moment, if I remember correctly… Which is quite a Western orientated country now…And then again you have many Turkish refugees, and asylum seekers and immigrants, probably some of the highest proportion of immigrants are of Turkish background… So there is a situation where you have Syrians moving to Turkey, and no doubt this is a strain on the Turkish people, no doubt, but the Turkish are also seeking in large numbers to move from their home of Turkey, and there is no war there in Turkey. So the motivation of the Refugees themselves is a problem, and that motivation would not be congruent with the standards of say National Socialism, which Aryanism.net supports….. My line of thought is leading to a question of the motivation of both the refugees and the host countries they are going to? Is the motivation truly “National Socialist” in action? Or is this indeed more the old Western “pursuit of individual happiness”? The Liberty! Is this not more congruent with the French inspired notions of Libertas?
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
This poem was quoted in JFK’s book “A Nation Of Immigrants” and it the poem that appears on the Statue of Liberty in New York and it was written by a Sephardic Jew named Emma Lazarus. The idea of “Refugees Welcome” is nothing new, it is an old idea, it rather normalized these days and very common, it is not revolutionary in any way, because America itself – the “Leader of the West” – is in fact a Nation of Immigrants, and look what that country has done! It is America that is the shining light for the great Immigration ideal…But has that turned out well?
I assume, in regards to circumcision, you do know that Muslims practice circumcision as Jews do, as they both consider themselves the descendants of “Abraham”…..What does Aryanism.net think about Halal being congruent with Kosher? Is this something that is inline with animal cruelty? I think it is…. Why support Muslims when they practice Judaic torture rituals? Protestant Christians also practice circumcision, so they are not much different… Catholics don’t, but Catholics are also great supporters of Muslims and Jews, not so much in the past of course, according to their histories, but today, all these Abrahamic Religions support each other ultimately, reinforcing the Biblical Creeds and dogmas…. Would not Aryanism.net be fundamentally against all Abrahamic Religions? From a true Luciferian Gnostic point of view.
@Thor
“But why would the Refugees want to come to the West”
Because they want it
“There are many places in the East that are just as wealthy if not more so now than the West?”
But they want to migrate to Europe where the place is closer from the former country where they live
“I don’t see how this will be of benefit to the immigrants and refugees, or the people of the countries in which they are arriving in.”
It was the fault of the government of the country in which they came, they deliberately did not prepare for such circumstances, very much in line with the Zionist agenda, which the outcome of the agenda is the right-wing party to be widely elected by the people as a solution to the problem of immigrants.
If the government limits the news media, so the news that sparks hostilities between indigenous people and immigrant people does not appear, and the government also dares to punish deterrent to immigrants / refugees who create riots, and immigrants / refugees are also helped to find employment, it will solve the problem
“would not be congruent with the standards of say National Socialism, which Aryanism.net supports….. My line of thought is leading to a question of the motivation of both the refugees and the host countries they are going to? Is the motivation truly “National Socialist” in action?”
That is our task to educate them to be anti-Zionist citizens, so they not just seeking asylum, but also want to destroy the Jewish control in the country where they migrate, that is the best contribution of migrants and refugees
“This poem was quoted in JFK’s book “A Nation Of Immigrants” and it the poem that appears on the Statue of Liberty in New York and it was written by a Sephardic Jew named Emma Lazarus”
There are also many Jews who back right-wing parties and white nationalist movement, please read this content from the website :
http://aryanism.net/politics/white-nationalists/
“It is America that is the shining light for the great Immigration ideal…But has that turned out well?”
It can be work if the government prepare for it well, again, read the content about immigration problem from the website
@ Fatih Dion
“because they want it”
But why do they want to come to the West? What is the motivation? I have seen many refugees and they are not starving, nor badly injured, and mostly they are young healthy men….One would think that they would be, if it was a genuine refugee crisis that the refugees would be women, children and the old, sick and injured….The men, if they were genuine men, would be fighting to protect their families and would send their women, children, sick and old, etc first…They would not go and leave them behind, that seems rather strange to me….They are fleeing their homelands…. How does that fit in with National Socialism? Not that I am a Nationalist myself, I am not, and I am not debating from a Nationalist position, I am simply pointing out that there appears to be inherent flaws in the Aryanism.net dogma… And I dont imagine for a minute that those flaws can be fixed.
@ Fatih Dion
“It can be work if the government prepare for it well”
I assume you mean if the Western countries you want to see destroyed prepare well for it? So you are asking that the West be destroyed but also that the Western government contribute to their own destruction? Or what? I am not sure what this means, as with many things with Aryanism.net, it does not seem to make sense. I am sure I would not be the first person to point this out, but it would seem rather odd to have a Swastika next to an Antifa sign of “Refugees Welcome”…. I just don’t see how it goes together…
Should the dogma of Aryanism.net instead be something like “if you can flee your homeland and ask somebody else in a far away place to help you, do so at all costs”
Why, may I ask, do Refugees feel the need to be helped, does that make them feel good? And why do Host countries feel the need to help Refugees, does that make them feel good?
One could put forward a simple proverb like “charity begins in the home”…. This simple proverb might be more problem solving then a hundred pages of dogma.
Or Hitler might say something like “Help yourselves”…. Like he said: “German people, help yourselves”…. One could extend this to the Refugees: “Charity begins at home, please help yourselves.”
@Otto
No, they could avoid destruction altogether by not being Western Nations in the first place. It isn’t that difficult to not enslave people.
In this line of thought, I would be classed as an “Anti-Zionist” because the Zionists encouraged Jewish immigrants and refugees to go to Palestine, and that immigration has been fully supported by the West. But then should not Aryanism.net also support Jewish immigration into Palestine? Seeming you support immigration at all costs…Or is the immigration you support selective? The Jews claimed that they were fleeing “persecution “is this not the same as another non-Jew fleeing because of “persecution”? But there seems to be a wide criteria for what constitutes a refugee, it could be persecution, political differences, poverty, war, or as I have heard many times “seeking a better life” which would come under the “pursuit of happiness” in my opinion…But the question is if somebody is capable of travelling all the way to another country away from their homeland, then they are capable of staying in their own homeland. And would that not be more constructive in the long run? Many times, throughout history people have lost their homes and livelihoods but they did not flee, they stayed and rebuilt…Is this not more noble?
@Otto
“But why do they want to come to the West? What is the motivation? ”
To save themselves and start a new life
“I have seen many refugees and they are not starving, nor badly injured”
If the refugees are seriously injured and starved, how can they migrate?
“and mostly they are young healthy men”
Everyone can choose where they live, just as the white people did when they gained new land by colonizing the land in the past
“How does that fit in with National Socialism? ”
We are National Socialist, not Communist that closing the country’s border and anti immigrant and refugees, read the website content about immigration issue
“but also that the Western government contribute to their own destruction?”
So you suppose if the western state destroys itself by receiving many refugees from Middle Eastern and African countries, and you are not aware that their country is already destroyed by the economic system created by a group of white-Jews
With many Muslims and Negroes in Europe, Muslims hate Jews, so they have a chance to drive the Jews from the place where they live, and if they rule the government they will liberate the country they live from the Zionist influence, and negro people are clean in nature, they are usual to living without using many technologies that require a lot of energy to make the technology work
“but it would seem rather odd to have a Swastika next to an Antifa sign of “Refugees Welcome”
Read our website content, especially about white nationalist, the difference between neo-Nazism and Authentic National Socialism, National Socialism and Islam, and about multi-ethnic society
http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-nazism/
http://aryanism.net/politics/multiethnic-society/
http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-islam/
And you will know what our movement means
@ Lucius Rhine,
What would they be if they were not “Western Nations”? And how does the West differ from the East these days…From what I have seen, due to Globalization the two do not seem so dissimilar. And if the East is superior and more noble than why would the Refugees want to come to the West at all, why not stay in the East? The immigration does appear to be rather one way – from East to West, in terms of current immigration statistics….
“Many times, throughout history people have lost their homes and livelihoods but they did not flee, they stayed and rebuilt…Is this not more noble?”
So why do white people migrate enormously to Australia and America, even if they do not want to integrate, instead kill and expel the natives, They are not in war, they are healthy, they have possessions and wealth?
They are far more cruel than immigrants from Africa and Arab whom they completely escape from danger and civil war
Everyone can choose where they live, just like white people like you, duh!
I see that Aryanism.net is against “White Nationalism”…And it appears any Western Nationalism, but supportive of Eastern Nationalism, mostly…. For example supportive of North Korean nationalism…. But why don’t you support Refugees going to North Korea? Also the North Koreans are being threatened with war and “WMD’s”, but I dont see millions of North Korean refugees…. Where are the North Korean Refugee Advocacy groups?
Does anyone on Aryanism.net have a refugee currently living in their own home? If not why not? Or why not go directly to where they are and help them rebuild their own homes if they are without a home…Many people are without homes in this world….There are probably a million homeless people in America and yet America provided aid to refugees without a home? Rather strange behavior… Home ownership is a dream of most people, whether in the East or the West, it is not and has never been anything but a privilege and a luxury that most will never afford…Why should refugees expect privileges… I myself dont own a home… Could I be classed as a “refugee”…? At times I feel persecuted? Do I classify for asylum just because I dont own a home and sometimes feel persecuted? Many billions of people in the world today cannot provide adequately for their families and suffer hardship, should they all get up and flee and lob on somebody else’s doorstep? Does that benefit anyone?
Fatih Dion
“So why do white people migrate enormously to Australia and America”
I dont know why they would? It does not appear to have done them any good…Just look at Australia and America: diseased, corrupt, ignoble, degenerate, materialistic, lacking all honor, indebted, mindless wage slaves….The list goes on….Many of the first settlers who arrived in places like Australia or America, would have wondered the same thing, “why the hell did we come to this place for?”…. And it has not turned out well for anyone…Now, it would be inconsiderate to say just because the whites immigrated then the everybody else should immigrate too….Why not learn from the mistakes of the past? And I am not saying that this or that people are more cruel or less cruel than anybody else… But you have said that the Whites are more cruel then say Africans, if that is the case then why would the Africans want to go to the cruel place from which the Whites came from?
@ Fatih Dion
“Everyone can choose where they live”
No, most people cannot choose where they live, they have no choice…I cannot choose where I live, for one, and most people cannot choose where they live…That would be a luxury and a privilege to be able to choose where one wants or desires to live.
@Otto
“And if the East is superior and more noble than why would the Refugees want to come to the West at all, why not stay in the East?”
Because Africa and the Middle East are closer to Europe than Asia
“I see that Aryanism.net is against “White Nationalism”…And it appears any Western Nationalism, but supportive of Eastern Nationalism, mostly…. For example supportive of North Korean nationalism….”
You still not understand about nationalism means, and I’m not sure that you read the website content, please dont trolling
“But why don’t you support Refugees going to North Korea? Also the North Koreans are being threatened with war and “WMD’s””
Too far!!!
And North Korea still at stage to enter the war condition, not already at war
“Does anyone on Aryanism.net have a refugee currently living in their own home? If not why not? Or why not go directly to where they are and help them rebuild their own homes if they are without a home…Many people are without homes in this world….There are probably a million homeless people in America and yet America provided aid to refugees without a home? Rather strange behavior… Home ownership is a dream of most people, whether in the East or the West, it is not and has never been anything but a privilege and a luxury that most will never afford…Why should refugees expect privileges… I myself dont own a home… Could I be classed as a “refugee”…? At times I feel persecuted? Do I classify for asylum just because I dont own a home and sometimes feel persecuted? Many billions of people in the world today cannot provide adequately for their families and suffer hardship, should they all get up and flee and lob on somebody else’s doorstep? Does that benefit anyone?”
The difference between the refugees and you is that they are in great danger and you are just homeless, this is not about home ownership or something, and not everyone who is in danger of leaving their country, it is very silly
@Otto:
“Is the motivation truly “National Socialist” in action? Or is this indeed more the old Western “pursuit of individual happiness”? The Liberty! Is this not more congruent with the French inspired notions of Libertas?
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
This poem was quoted in JFK’s book “A Nation Of Immigrants” and it the poem that appears on the Statue of Liberty in New York and it was written by a Sephardic Jew named Emma Lazarus. The idea of “Refugees Welcome” is nothing new, it is an old idea, it rather normalized these days and very common, it is not revolutionary in any way, because America itself – the “Leader of the West” – is in fact a Nation of Immigrants, and look what that country has done! It is America that is the shining light for the great Immigration ideal…But has that turned out well?”
America barely has a culture of its own, so immigrants have no incentive to assimilate into their host nation of America once they arrive. It’s very hard to define what an American actually is anymore. Perhaps why Americans are mostly also okay with dual-citizens working in their governments? This is not the fault of the immigrants, however. Under a National Socialist state and immigrant, if judged to be noble and worthy, would be invited to join the folk community and become a citizen of their respective nation. Let’s say for example the immigrant in question was living in Germany, that immigrant would have to accept German culture as their own, and drop their previous nationality and culture almost entirely. If that immigrant wanted to set-up a business selling Mexican style tacos in Germany, that business would clearly need to be labelled as a “Mexican Taco Restaurant”. If the immigrant in question did not want to be a part of the German folk, then he would need a work permit in order to stay in that country. Lastly, any ignoble immigrant that attempted to gain access into National Socialist country would be summarily executed. Any immigrant that attempted to damage the folk community of a National Socialist would also meet a similar fate. So, in short, no a National Socialist country does not necessarily accept the “wretched refuse” of other nations, depending on which definition we are using for the word “wretched” of course. (I personally don’t like the word, because it is vague.)
If we are using the following words to define “wretched”: despicable, contemptible, reprehensible, base, vile, loathsome, hateful, detestable, odious, ignoble, shameful, shabby, worthless; informaldirty, rotten, lowdown, lousy Then a National Socialist state would accept them, if only to execute them. Thus, they would never make it into the folk community, or anyone else’s for that matter.
I assume, in regards to circumcision, you do know that Muslims practice circumcision as Jews do, as they both consider themselves the descendants of “Abraham”…..What does Aryanism.net think about Halal being congruent with Kosher? Is this something that is inline with animal cruelty? I think it is…. Why support Muslims when they practice Judaic torture rituals? Protestant Christians also practice circumcision, so they are not much different… Catholics don’t, but Catholics are also great supporters of Muslims and Jews, not so much in the past of course, according to their histories, but today, all these Abrahamic Religions support each other ultimately, reinforcing the Biblical Creeds and dogmas…. Would not Aryanism.net be fundamentally against all Abrahamic Religions? From a true Luciferian Gnostic point of view.
Yes, Aryanist’s are anti-Abrahamic.
Religions to be Salvaged: Buddhism, Christianity, Mohammedanism.
Also Jainism, Rastafari, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, etc.
Religions to be Terminated: Judaism
All Gentile tribalist religions.
Bahai.
Religions to be Revived: Atenism, Manichaeism, Mohism, Pythagoreanism, Tlamatini, etc.
//aryanism.net/religion/
Anyone caught circumcising a child against their will and without their consent would be executed regardless of their religion, or any other belief.
So you are asking that the West be destroyed but also that the Western government contribute to their own destruction? Or what? I am not sure what this means, as with many things with Aryanism.net, it does not seem to make sense. I am sure I would not be the first person to point this out, but it would seem rather odd to have a Swastika next to an Antifa sign of “Refugees Welcome”…. I just don’t see how it goes together…
The West is already dieing. Western Culture is also known as Judeo-Greco-Christian culture, and it is slated to self destruct. We are just pushing it along a bit….
Aryanism professes universal compassion as coined by Hitler’s favorite philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer. “Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality” — Arthur Schopenhauer So, let us ask you; how would you wish to be treated if you were a refugee? Would you hope that you were given the benefit of the doubt that your refugee status was indeed authentic, and that you were indeed fleeing a war zone after your home was destroyed, or would you wish to be called an invader and turned away?
Even “innocent until proven guilty” is a supposed western ideal, yet many are unwilling to extend that to others outside of their own group, apparently? Why is that?
“But why do they want to come to the West? What is the motivation? I have seen many refugees and they are not starving, nor badly injured, and mostly they are young healthy men….”
This is the same thing western rightists keep telling us, but we don’t believe them either: “Rumors and misinformation have been an integral part of anti-refugee campaigns across the world, among them the claim that migrants and refugees are suspiciously young, able-bodied, and male — in other words, like “soldiers,” “terrorists,” or (as this particular meme says outright) “invaders.”"
https://www.snopes.com/refugee-invaders-meme/
You’re going to have to offer much better facts to support your claim before we take it seriously.
“but it would seem rather odd to have a Swastika next to an Antifa sign of “Refugees Welcome”…. I just don’t see how it goes together…”
What better way to drive the final nail into the coffin of ANTIFA?
Duh….
@Otto
“Now, it would be inconsiderate to say just because the whites immigrated then the everybody else should immigrate too…. Why not learn from the mistakes of the past?”
Immigration is a natural and not a mistake, but, immigration to a territory by killing indigenous people and stealing their land is evil and far wrong
“But you have said that the Whites are more cruel then say Africans, if that is the case then why would the Africans want to go to the cruel place from which the Whites came from?”
White people are the most cruel in the past, and now they have realized their mistakes (global colonialism) so they allow non-white people to come and live in their territory in return, that is justice
“No, most people cannot choose where they live, they have no choice…I cannot choose where I live, for one, and most people cannot choose where they live…That would be a luxury and a privilege to be able to choose where one wants or desires to live.”
Pity you, when many people find many options to determine where they want to live
BONUS:
Ms. Lauryn Hill – Consumerism (Official Video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH8dKDPm0sw
(I don’t think Aryanists will agree with everything in those lyrics, but it’s damn good. Lauryn even mentions ‘ageism’, which surprised me, and perhaps one reason I’m so impressed with her lyrics to that song.)
Well Western culture is not dying, in fact it has spread all over the world, the East is more Westernized now then most Western places. I don’t know if you folks travel much but Google is handy, have a look at Dubai, Jumeirah, Mumbai, Shanghai, Doha, Nairobi or Lagos…Have a look at these sophisticated modern cities and tell me if the look any different to Melbourne, Atlanta, Baltimore, Dublin or Frankfurt?
If the people of the East, as you seem to see them with the rose-tinted glasses as “noble savages”, if they leave their homelands, will then not the evil Whites of the West come in and take the homeland that they left behind? Why not stay and defend their superior and more noble culture that they have, why flee into the arms of cruelty and evil in the places where Whites came from, surely those places are more evil seeming they spawned the Whites in the first place. It does not look like the East is protecting itself or destroying Western Materialistic Capitalistic Democracies….The opposite in fact… They are assimilating into it…Which is exactly how the Western Materialistic Capitalistic Democracies say they want it – they want the “assimilation”!
It appears to me, as an individual observer (I am not on anyone’s “side”) that your support of the well established and traditional Western policy of “Refugees Welcome” suits the Western counties very well…It is what they want to as it is their established policy, the UN organizes the details and logistics of this policy, and of course there would be a certain amount of dissent and back-lash about the policy, which the globalist orientated UN has organised for decades. Indeed one could say that the West deliberate causes strife in the East in order to create a “refugee crisis” so that they can disperse the refugees and assimilate them into their Western nations. They can then go in and rebuild in the Western manner the places where the refugees came from…And thus the process of Westernization continues.
@ Amaleq
“What better way to drive a nail into the coffin of ANTIFA”
Have you tried that swastika thing at an ANTIFA rally?
I don’t think that idea would turn out very well for you in that case.
@Otto:
Why do we need to show up anywhere ANTIFA is, and wave anything now?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/yes-antifa-is-the-moral-equivalent-of-neo-nazis/2017/08/30/9a13b2f6-8d00-11e7-91d5-ab4e4bb76a3a_story.html?utm_term=.15de34aeb738
Global Debt Hits Record $233 Trillion:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-05/global-debt-hits-record-233-trillion-but-debt-to-gdp-is-falling
America is already bankrupt.
@Otto
“I see that Aryanism.net is against “White Nationalism”…And it appears any Western Nationalism, but supportive of Eastern Nationalism, mostly….”
We do not oppose German or Irish nationalism, for instance, and in fact we do not oppose any nationalism. But White “nationalism” isn’t nationalism at all, but instead identitarianism.
“There are probably a million homeless people in America and yet America provided aid to refugees without a home?”
Why are your priotitising homeless people born in America, over homeless people not born in America? It is up to the state (and the labour of its citizens) to provide its citizens with accomodation.
“I myself dont own a home… Could I be classed as a “refugee”…? At times I feel persecuted? Do I classify for asylum just because I dont own a home and sometimes feel persecuted?”
If you feel you are not being treated well in the country you are in now, then please, by all means, just move to another country and you’ll be classified as an immigrant.
“No, most people cannot choose where they live, they have no choice…I cannot choose where I live, for one, and most people cannot choose where they live…That would be a luxury and a privilege to be able to choose where one wants or desires to live.”
It is up to the State to build efficient infrastructure and trans-national transportation so that people may travel with ease, and therefore choose where they want to live.
“Well Western culture is not dying, in fact it has spread all over the world”
We are trying to halt this spread.
“Mumbai”
https://www.thebetterindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Dharavi_DSC3254_5842973175.jpg
(ignore the background)
“Lagos”
https://news.bbcimg.co.uk/news/special/shorthands/36505/media/lagos1920street-l-mr_eexujmu.jpg
“Shanghai”
http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/6720944a2c744fbe8fce005f2dbba877/a-street-scene-from-dajing-road-market-shanghai-china-bdg3p4.jpg
Doesn’t look like Western cities at all. (By the way, the cities on the southern end of the Persian Gulf you mentioned are as Western as the cities in Europe.)
“Indeed one could say that the West deliberate causes strife in the East in order to create a “refugee crisis” so that they can disperse the refugees and assimilate them into their Western nations.”
That is what globalists and Jews want. We want the refugees to de-Westernise places severely infected with Western Civilisation (i.e. most of Europe and North America).
And for the record, we do not exalt Eastern civilisation as being superior than Western civilisation, nor do we want to convert the latter into the former; we want to built civilisation anew.
@Otto:
It appears to me, as an individual observer (I am not on anyone’s “side”) that your support of the well established and traditional Western policy of “Refugees Welcome” suits the Western counties very well…
No, it suits those of us who are paying attention, and are playing to win, very well.
“Out of the twenty-two civilizations that have appeared in history, nineteen of them collapsed when they reached the moral state the United States is in now.” — British Historian, Arnold J. Toynbee
Suppose we could say the same for a lot of western nations at this point?
‘Tasteless, Vulgar and Obscene.’ China Just Banned Hip-Hop Culture and Tattoos From Television:
http://time.com/5112061/china-hip-hop-ban-tattoos-television/
I see these types of trends gaining strength all over the world in non-western nations as the west suffocates in its own hedonism.
@Otto:
Have you ever studied the Wiemar Republic? Just because they figured out how to keep that model afloat longer post WWII, doesn’t mean that eventually it won’t suffer the same fate….
@ Sun of the Isles
So German and Irish Nationalism is not the same as White Nationalism?
As far as I know, Germany and Ireland were White Nations….To begin with… Is there something wrong with that? Personally I don’t see anything wrong with China being a Yellow Nation to begin with….What about “Yellow Nationalism”? Why not mention that? Or Black Nationalism, or Red Nationalism, why is there only “White Nationalism” in your eyes? Why the discrimination against Whites? Lets be fair and honest… Why is Nationalism good for North Korea, but not good for Sweden?
Why is Nationalism good for Palestinians but not good for Norwegians?
@Otto
You must learn the true meaning of nationalism on the website content, especially about National Socialism and Nazism, please read it
If the West is hedonistic then why do not all Chinese people leave the West and return to China?
I am not trolling because I happen to believe in some of the tenets that Aryanism.net has put forth. So please do not consider me a troll, that would be unfair.
I am not labeling anyone or being bigoted in any way….I am merely asking some questions. Please be considerate of this. I am not anti East or anti West. But I can acknowledge that there is such a thing as Orientalism… Aryanism.net is leaning towards Orientalism?
@ Fatih Dion
Would not Nationalism be related to the homeland of one’s birth? Why flee the homeland of one’s birth?
@Otto
Stop spamming. Do not post more than one comment at a time.
“What about “Yellow Nationalism”? Why not mention that? Or Black Nationalism, or Red Nationalism, why is there only “White Nationalism” in your eyes? Why the discrimination against Whites? Lets be fair and honest… Why is Nationalism good for North Korea, but not good for Sweden?”
First off, “White Nationalism” has nothing to do with true nationalism. The term is an oxymoron.
Secondly, we do criticize other tribalist groups on this site, e.g. Zionists, “Black Israelities” etc. WNs just happen to be the largest, most moronic tribalist movement out there, and they also desecrate the legacy of National Socialism by trying to appropriate it for themselves. Hence our special treatment towards them.
“Why is Nationalism good for Palestinians but not good for Norwegians?”
Nationalism is “good” for people of most every nationality. And by nationalism we do not mean closing borders/deporting all immigrants/revoking the citizenship of all non-native people, and other similar practices. Quite the opposite, as you can read here, in detail, under the heading “Nationalism, Socialism, and National Socialism”.
“If the West is hedonistic then why do not all Chinese people leave the West and return to China?”
Probably because they themselves are hedonists, and therefore want to share in the hubris of other hedonists. Or, they want to destroy Western civilization from the inside. Or they can’t afford to emigrate from the country. I do not see the point of your question.
@Amaleq
“Hip-Hop Culture”
Wait a minute. Isn’t hip-hop culture part of the counterculture, which we do support?
@Otto
“Would not Nationalism be related to the homeland of one’s birth? Why flee the homeland of one’s birth?”
Nationalism is not neccesarily related to one’s country of birth, and is instead related to the country one atttaches to, becomes a part of, voluntarily .
“But I can acknowledge that there is such a thing as Orientalism… Aryanism.net is leaning towards Orientalism?”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism
Quoted from the Wikipedia page:
“a general patronizing Western attitude towards Middle Eastern, Asian and North African societies… the West essentializes these societies as static and undeveloped—thereby fabricating a view of Oriental culture that can be studied, depicted, and reproduced…”
We view Western civilisation itself as inferior, therefore we are not inclined in any manner towards Orientalism.
@Sun of the Isles:
“Wait a minute. Isn’t hip-hop culture part of the counterculture, which we do support?”
Yes, it is. But, just like Christianity there are two forms of Hip-Hop:
“Culturally, the 1990s are characterized by the rise of multiculturalism and alternative media, which continued into the 2000s. Movements such as grunge, the rave scene and hip hop spread around the world to young people during that decade, aided by then-new technology such as cable television and the World Wide Web…”, “A combination of factors, including the continued mass mobilization of capital markets through neo-liberalism, the thawing of the decades-long Cold War, the beginning of the widespread proliferation of new media such as the Internet from the middle of the decade onwards, increasing skepticism towards government, and the dissolution of the Soviet Union led to a realignment and reconsolidation of economic and political power across the world and within countries.” – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s
As neoliberal capitalism spread, corporate interests began to see the potential that hip-hop had to spread western materialism and hedonism around the globe, so they slowly began to take it over to use it as such. By pouring large amounts of capital into hip-hop corporate interests were able to sign artists who would push any message that the corporate interests wanted for the right amount of money, ultimately corrupting hip-hop, and removing its pure revolutionary strains as much as possible.
The Tall Israeli Who Runs Hip Hop: An Investigation into Engineered Culture and Bankers: http://themindunleashed.com/2017/04/tall-israeli-runs-hip-hop-investigation-engineered-culture-bankers.html
You could almost call the following Gnostic hip-hop if you wanted; but do you think those same corporate interests will ever push Payday Monsanto’s Hip-Hop for example?
PAYDAY MONSANTO – MEGA SHEKELS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkNOyB_XK5M&list=RDzkNOyB_XK5M
What about Madd Cold’s Hip-Hop?
Montreal Police Investigating ‘Death to Israel’ Rapper After B’nai Brith Complaint:
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/b_nai_brith_calls_on_montreal_police_to_investigate_death_to_israel_rapper
——
Of interest too for those that wish to familiarize themselves with the struggle hip-hop is engaged in because of the corporate interests involved:
ARE YOU A HIP-HOP APOLOGIST?
http://www.guerrillafunk.com/thoughts/doc002012are_you_a_hip_hop_apologist.html
I am writing in much further detail about this subject on the True Left webpage actually, so the above is just a brief summary.
@Otto:
Would not Nationalism be related to the homeland of one’s birth? Why flee the homeland of one’s birth?
Is it really that difficult for you to imagine that some people may be born into a country that they absolutely hate? My step-father actually happens to be such a person. He absolutely hated England because of its weather, so he moved us to California.
If Western Civilization is inferior than why would refugees from superior Oriental cultures want to go to the West to be Westernized and become inferior?
@ Amaleq
If you suggest that people move because they prefer warmer weather that does not correlate very well with the tenets of say National Socialism.
Dont call yourselves “National Socialists” call yourselves “The Fair Weather People”….Then there would be no misunderstanding…
@Otto
“If Western Civilization is inferior than why would refugees from superior Oriental cultures want to go to the West to be Westernized and become inferior?”
Not everyone likes to live in their country, so they move to a country they like to live
“Dont call yourselves “National Socialists” call yourselves “The Fair Weather People”….Then there would be no misunderstanding…”
Call yourself Bolshevik Communist troller if you against immigration to avoid misunderstanding about National Socialism
@Otto
“If Western Civilization is inferior then why would refugees from superior Oriental cultures want to go to the West to be Westernjzed and become inferior?”
Because they are refugees and are seeking shelter from violence. They are not necessarily coming from superior states, but they themselves may hold superior culture. I will reiterate this: People can, and will travel as they please. National Socialism avoids any economic issues from this by having national fiat. National Socialism avoids any cultural issues from this by having superior culture in the first place that allows for any immigrants to have the chance to integrate into said culture. All problems currently taking place in Europe could’ve been avoided 100 years ago had National Socialism prevailed; alas, it did not.
We, as Aryanists, have faith that the Muslim immigrants will remember the words of Muhammad when traveling to these European countries, therefore integrating their superior culture into the inferior cultures of Europe that are currently hegemonic. This, at the very least, would provide the opportunity for Europe to truly start anew, away from the Judeo-Christian empires that have previously ruled it and shaped it into what it has become.