Anti-Zionist harvest 2018 contd.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/student-government-passes-anti-israel-resolution-only-jewish-senator-quits-after-anti-semitic-threats/article/2647762

Student governors at the University of South Florida recently called for a vote to pass a “Hands Off” resolution, which would officially declare the Student Senate in opposition to Israel and condemn President Trump’s decision to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. After much controversy, an amended version passed this week.

Spencer Tate, the only Jewish senator, resigned after receiving threats for opposing the original “Hands Off” resolution.

A Facebook account allegedly linked with the Arab League sent Tate (translated), “You will die by our hands and we will take Jerusalem and fill Palestine with your impure blood. Jerusalem is for us, and death for you.”

In his resignation letter, Tate stated, “It is clear to see that being Jewish and a zionist comes with repercussions in Student government ranging from death threats to being alienated in all aspects… I have experienced so much hatred spearheaded by senate leadership in the past few months and I will be doing everything in my power to hold you accountable, it is clear to see that it’s simply not possible to do this in senate.”

If only these young people alone represented the future, then the future would be ours without trouble. Unfortunately, in reality they represent only a fraction of the future, the other fraction being represented by Generation Identity. Thus the only certainty for the future is war between these two sides, from which only one side can emerge victorious. Everything we do now must go towards preparing our side to fight and win.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

99 Responses to Anti-Zionist harvest 2018 contd.

  1. Otto says:

    “The only way to remedy the evil I have been speaking of is to train the Germans from youth upwards to an absolute recognition of the rights of their own people’ instead of poisoning their minds;” – Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf – Chapter III, Political Reflections Arising Out Of My Sojourn In Vienna.

  2. Otto says:

    Who is Adolf Hitler speaking of when he refers to “Germans”? I ask this in all good faith, to those who are more literate and more educated than myself. Please do not discriminate against me because I am not as literate and educated as yourselves.

  3. Otto says:

    Adolf Hitler distinguished between the “German people in Austria” thus he considered that there were German people in Austria, like himself. On what basis does he distinguish a German from an Austrian? Do you know, or would you like me to tell you?

  4. Otto says:

    “The French people who are becoming more and more obsessed by negroid ideas, represent a threatening menace to the existence of the white race in Europe, because they are bound up with the Jewish campaign for world domination. For the contamination caused by the influx of negroid blood on the Rhine, in the very heart of Europe, is in accord with the sadist and perverse lust for vengeance on the part of the hereditary enemy of our people, just as it suits the purpose of the cool, calculating Jew who would use this means of introducing a process of bastardization in the very centre of the European Continent, and by infecting the white race with the blood of inferior stock, would destroy the foundations of its independent existence.” – Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf – Chapter XIII – The German Post-War Policy Of Alliances.

    It seems to me, and this is just my mere independent opinion, so I could be wrong, but it seems to me that AH is distinguishing here between races? Beyond State borders, in the sense that the “white race” is a race. What do you think?

  5. Otto says:

    Does Aryanism.net support “bastardization” between Negroids and Whites? If so how does this confer with the above quote?

  6. Stanley Queen says:

    @Otto

    “H. S. Chamberlain understood that he was German by blood. Do you support false borders? I have read nearly all H.S Chamberlain’s works, have you?”

    Show me proof that Chamberlain explicitly stated ‘that he was German by blood’.

  7. Stanley Queen says:

    @Otto

    Also, check out this link and tell me why there were quite a few ‘Nazis of non-Germanic descent’:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazis_of_non-Germanic_descent

  8. Otto says:

    Stanley Queen,

    Wikipedia? LOL….

  9. Otto says:

    @ Stanley Queen

    Don’t you consider H.S. Chamberlain to be German by blood?

  10. Otto says:

    Did not “Angles” and “Saxons” originally come from Germany?

  11. Stanley Queen says:

    @Otto

    1.) Show me proof that the Wikipedia link does not sincerely show ‘Nazis of non-Germanic descent’.

    2.) No one knows for sure where the ‘Angles’ exactly came from, but, yes, ‘Saxons’ came from the place we know as Germany today. But they are Germanic people (like the ancient Greeks according to Hitler), not Germans. When obtaining votes in his early polical days, Hitler publicly represented German interests (not Germanic interests) for the most part, like in the 25-point Program that he put out for the public. Your point is ultimately moot.

  12. Sun of the Isles says:

    @Otto

    “Who is Adolf Hitler speaking of when he refers to “Germans”?”

    Citizens of Germany, or those who desire to become a citizen of Germany.

    “It seems to me, and this is just my mere independent opinion, so I could be wrong, but it seems to me that AH is distinguishing here between races? Beyond State borders, in the sense that the “white race” is a race. What do you think?”

    Mein Kampf? LOL…… Mein Kampf was just a propaganda device to get Hitler elected.

  13. Stanley Queen says:

    @SotI

    I just read ‘Mein Kampf’ in its entirety recently. After reading it and checking out this website more, I’m pretty sure any principled complaints Hitler had about ‘black’ people in that book were based around the fact that Jews use them (like they use ‘whites’ and others) for exploitation.

  14. Sun of the Isles says:

    @Stanley

    “the fact that Jews use them (like they use ‘whites’ and others) for exploitation.”

    Umm, how exactly were Jews using the “blacks” in those time? I believe that you do not take the WN nonsense that the Jews used the “blacks” to genocide “whites” or something, right?

  15. LG says:

    “”“The French people who are becoming more and more obsessed by negroid ideas, represent a threatening menace to the existence of the white race in Europe, because they are bound up with the Jewish campaign for world domination. For the contamination caused by the influx of negroid blood on the Rhine, in the very heart of Europe, is in accord with the sadist and perverse lust for vengeance on the part of the hereditary enemy of our people, just as it suits the purpose of the cool, calculating Jew who would use this means of introducing a process of bastardization in the very centre of the European Continent, and by infecting the white race with the blood of inferior stock, would destroy the foundations of its independent existence.” – Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf – Chapter XIII – The German Post-War Policy Of Alliances.
    It seems to me, and this is just my mere independent opinion, so I could be wrong, but it seems to me that AH is distinguishing here between races? Beyond State borders, in the sense that the “white race” is a race. What do you think?”"

    I would suggest that the actions of the NSDAP portrayed in a previous comment best answer this inquiry: “”more than a million Polish workers had been brought into the Reich by May 1940.

    But by May 1940 it had become apparent that even the recruitment of the Poles could not satisfy the labor needs of the German economy. Consequently, even during and immediately after the „Frankreichfeldzug [expedition in France]“ a little over one million French prisoners of war were brought into the Reich as workers. In addition, a more intensive advertising campaign for workers was started in the allied countries and the occupied areas in the West and North.

    There were 7.6 million foreign workers in jobs in the Reich during September 1944: 5.7 million civil workers and just under two million prisoners of war.

    About 23 percent of all employed workers in the Reich during September 1944 were foreign civil workers or prisoners of war. … in specific firms, such as Daimler-Benz or the Volkswagenwerk, that the ratio was more than forty or fifty percent in the armament industry; in many production units it reached seventy and eighty percent, which meant that the German workers, aside from administration, were primarily used as trainers and supervisors. In addition to the direct armament industry, the construction sector and agriculture had particularly high proportions of foreign forced workers.
    But the use of foreign forced workers was not restricted just to the industry giants, but extended throughout the whole economy, apart from administration – from the small farm to the plumber with six employees to the Reichsbahn [State Railway System], to the local City Hall and the large armament firms.
    By the beginning of 1944 it had become apparent that even these truly impressive numbers could not satisfy the labor needs of particularly the large armament projects of the Reich,
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110604024311/http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/slave_labour13.htm
    Which German Chancellor is the biggest labour importer in the history of Germany? (Hint: not Merkel)”"

    However, if the original comment from Mein Kampf was sincere, then the labor importing could be interpreted as opportunist and a desperate measure to win the war. The true feelings on race the NSDAP, the SS, Hitler, and those closest to him felt are some of the most temperamental truths to uncover.

  16. Stanley Queen says:

    @SotI

    “Umm, how exactly were Jews using the “blacks” in those time?“

    Read the passages from ‘Mein Kampf’ again. Hitler mentions how Jews use ‘black’ people for world domination. All Jews have to do is subject ‘black’ people to bribery and/or violence (such as ethnic tensions, which is what Hitler was actually pointing out in ‘Mein Kampf) to help themselves ultimately establish Zionism.

  17. Amaleq says:

    “Westerners believe travel for leisure to be a right, as they shut their own borders for those that travel to be safe.” https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/safe-travels-wealthy-western-180228084544142.html — #AJOpinion

    The right thing to do would be to treat people as individuals and give them the benefit of the doubt when they state that they are ‘civilian’ refugees fleeing a war. You know, “innocent until proven guilty”, that slogan that westerners also love so much. It is really hard for some westerners, especially the vast majority that have very little understanding of history, to imagine themselves in a ‘civilian’ refugees shoes. Many westerners seem incapable of asking themselves how they would wish to be treated if they suddenly became a refugee fleeing a war zone. The irony of course to anyone with a firm grasp of history is that westerners have been refugees themselves many times throughout their history.

    In the advent that war does break out in the west again, or from other factors; be they economic, cosmic, or weather related, and westerners yet again become refugees seeking help from the non-western world, I would advocate that we separate from the western refugees those who were anti-refugee, anti-immigration, and generally racist, from the others, and force them to stay in the country they are trying to flee. They deserve no-less. It will not be hard to identify many of them through the internet.

  18. Otto says:

    National Socialist German Workers Party – NSDAP

    Hitler and the NSDAP meant at that time “German”…. Was Ist Deutsch?

    Do you really, in all honesty, believe that Hitler and the NSDAP were not German Nationalists? Hitler constantly pointed out the State was merely a political construct that should be designed to protect the “Volk”, those of the same “Race” and “Blood”…. The idea that you would not comprehend this seems almost impossible, unless you are being insincere… And yet the very person you quote, Hitler, you claim that he is being insincere and that his motivations were purely political?

    You have no evidence that there were millions of foreign workers in Germany during the Third Reich…

  19. Otto says:

    What if there is not a real war in Syria? What if that is propaganda? After all you have only seen images and televised news reports… But I know people that have tried to fight in these so called “wars” and they tell me that there is no real war, as such, in places like Syria. It seems to me that Aryanism.net is credulous and naive to the ways of the world.

  20. Otto says:

    Look, if you believe that mass immigration of non-Germans into Germany is good for Germans, then that is your belief, good luck with that. The problem is you are falsely quoting Hitler and the NSDAP. The idea that Hitler and the NSDAP shared the same beliefs as you is ludicrous and patently absurd….

  21. Otto says:

    Of course, if Germany and the Third Reich were importing slave labour for war related industry, how does this sit with Aryanism.net?

    In reality millions of German workers returned to Germany from all over the world during the the Third Reich. There were millions of native Germans in Poland alone…

  22. Otto says:

    Hitler always referred to the “German Volk”….

    The idea that you believe that the “German Volk”, is just any individual from any non-German land is ridiculous…

  23. AS says:

    @Amaleq

    “It is really hard for some westerners, especially the vast majority that have very little understanding of history, to imagine themselves in a ‘civilian’ refugees shoes.”

    This. Except I wouldn’t even say that understanding of history is what’s required; just the slightest amount of plain old common sense would suffice. Remember back here I actually had to explain what until then I had assumed was obvious to anyone:

    “Why won’t these people defend their own homes?”

    How do you “defend” against starvation, or poisoning? War destroys infrastructure, and thus reduces the carrying capacity of a given land to a small fraction of what it used to be prior to the war. When the population exceeds the carrying capacity, the excess people have to move. It is no different than when forest animals move elsewhere in response to humans razing the forest for wood.

    In Iraq and Afghanistan, the soil was (deliberately) filled with depleted uranium during the Zionist NATO invasions.

    Libya and Syria might well have this problem too (not sure about Sudan). And this is just one of many problems, others of which include water contamination/shortage, energy/fuel shortage (which in turn imply catastrophic drops both in production and in distribution of all kinds of products needed for daily life), etc.. This is what the term “war-torn” means.

    Imagine one day you first start noticing that your local supermarket is not restocking its food supplies. A few more days later it is completely empty, and so is every other food retailer nearby, as are the gas stations, and perhaps electricity and water have gone as well. You hear that it is because war in a different part of your country has cut off your entire region, so nothing will be transported in to replenish supplies for the foreseeable future. Your food/water stockpile at home will not last much longer. What do you do?

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/support-klaus-vogel/comment-page-1/#comment-172608

    Yet I have continued to encounter endless variations of the same supremely ignorant “Why won’t they stay and fight?” talking point literally EVERY DAY…… Must be all those Red Pills they are constantly high on……

  24. Hitler wouldn’t have allowed millions into his country for sure since it will cause overpopulation easily. Also, there would have been a chance that German culture would have most likely been under threat had he let in many people too.

  25. Fatih Dion says:

    @SS Daniel

    “Hitler wouldn’t have allowed millions into his country for sure since it will cause overpopulation easily. Also, there would have been a chance that German culture would have most likely been under threat had he let in many people too.”

    Mass migration will not cause overpopulation if the birthrate is controlled, and did you know that Hitler imported many immigrants for work in Germany from Eastern Europe during the war, that he (for compromise) and Himmler considered them as sub-human, see AS post on blog comments

    And actually Hitler while in power was destroying German culture like alcohol drinks, animal cruelty, smoke, etc and prefer Islamic way of life and anti-industrialist vision

    He never preserve a culture only because it exist, and only culture which noble and compatible on any form of society that must be preserved

    Please read again this content :

    http://aryanism.net/philosophy/arya/conservatism-liberalism-radicalism/

  26. Asides from drinking and smoking which is not even much of German culture, the arts, music and the language was kept in tact.

  27. Lucius Rhine says:

    @Daniel

    “German art and culture was kept in tact.”

    Wow way to undermine the incredible work Riefenstahl et al did to uproot the Jewish advancement on art and culture. No, they had an almost brand new culture it was not “kept in tact.” Much was done to change the cultural direction.

  28. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    How authentic is this with regards to culture?

    I came up against a phrase in Main Kampf, where Hitler said something like no ”Negro” or ”Chinaman” would ever ”become German” just because has learned to speak German.

  29. Fatih Dion says:

    @SS Daniel

    Awareness of authentic National Socialism as a system wholly distinct from Nazism was initially restricted to a few apolitical historians, whose main advantage over the neo-Nazis was that they studied the real policies of National Socialist Germany post-1933 and the factional power plays within the NSDAP, as opposed to unrealistically presuming that Hitler personally read and authorized every statement made or action taken by every single subdivision in National Socialist Germany at every moment (“Suppose, then, that for some reason or other the price of cheese went up. Everybody would immediately say: Of course! The Fuehrer is himself personally interested in the price of cheese.” – Adolf Hitler), or worse, that National Socialism is defined by whatever is written in Mein Kampf, which was written with the aim of – to put it bluntly – making the NSDAP popular enough with the masses to win a democratic election. It was the Allied Powers which had actively reinforced among Weimar Germans the idea that they were fellow “white” people (via propaganda such as 1910s-1920s Hollywood movies with their notoriously demeaning portrayals of ethnic minorities), as this obscured the reality that the Weimar Republic itself was in all but name a Western colonial possession no different than “non-white” colonies such as India, Algeria, Kenya, etc.. (This is the same trick as the House vs Field trick applied to slaves in Antebellum-era US.) The masses who had already bought into this viewpoint were, unfortunately, the masses whom Hitler had to say whatever it might take to get them to vote NSDAP, and it is this which accounts for the few bigoted statements that can be found in Mein Kampf, as well as why (as Otto Wagener recalled) Hitler in later years wanted it removed from circulation.

    “The society which was created after the NSDAP achieved power was in many ways a compromise. Hitler himself admitted (to Leon Degrelle among others) that it would be the next generation – the Hitler Youth generation – which would create a genuine National-Socialist society. Organizations such as the SS and the Hitler Youth were steps toward the creation of such a National-Socialist society, and it was these organizations which implemented the ideal of personal honour, and respect for others, of whatever race and culture. As Hitler and his true followers, such as Rudolf Hess, matured in understanding, so too did National-Socialism. National-Socialism was not born, fully-developed and fully-understood, in the early years of the NSDAP – it developed slowly, over several decades. Thus, as Hitler admitted, Mein Kampf was never intended to be some kind of bible of National-Socialism: it was the product of its time.” – David Myatt

    Yet among these historians who understood all of the above (ie. that Eurocentrism was certainly not something that Hitler started, but was rather the status-quo in the Weimar Republic and which Hitler thus had to reluctantly flow with prior to achieving power), most either lacked the philosophical perception to see the abstract unifying principles underlying the policies and party decisions, or did not wish to compromise their academic impartiality by taking on philosophical beliefs. Thus while they knew what National Socialism was not, only the fewest of them allowed themselves to see what it truly was.

    Read the website content about the difference between Neo-Nazi and Authentic National Socialism

    By the way its impossible if Hitler behave like Jews, he hate all of their behaviour including keeping ethnic pure

    If Hitler want ethnic blood to be pure, we have reason to detest and not follow him like other leaders of the Allied power

    And, if you let millions of European people settle in the Redskin land, South Africa and Aboriginal land, you must allow millions of non-whites come to your land, that is fairness/justice

  30. Sun of the Isles says:

    @FD

    “And actually Hitler while in power was destroying German culture like alcohol drinks, animal cruelty, smoke, etc and prefer Islamic way of life and anti-industrialist vision”

    As much as we would have loved Hitler to do these, we must stick to historical facts; else newcomers will see us as idiots. He merely practiced abstaining from alcohol and animal products for himself, he didn’t have time to ban dairy products etc since war was brewing and German society has other more pressing needs.

    Also, why would National Socialism ban alcohol? Alcohol was not made with animal products; I think it would be fine to consume alcohol as long as no cruelty ensues after that.

    “Hitler while in power was destroying German culture”

    Your wording is a bit improper. Hitler didn’t destroy German culture; he was improving it and purifying it from Jewish corruption.

    @Daniel

    “I came up against a phrase in Main Kampf, where Hitler said something like no ”Negro” or ”Chinaman” would ever ”become German” just because has learned to speak German.”

    Mein Kampf is, again, propaganda tool, which Hitler didn’t take seriously.

    @Lucius

    “Much was done to change the cultural direction.”

    Such as?

  31. Stanley Queen says:

    @SotI

    “I think it would be fine to consume alcohol as long as no cruelty ensues after that.”

    I don’t feel like getting into a debate over ‘what would Hitler do’ because those kinds of debates get very tedious and unnecessary. However, regardless of how Hitler positioned himself towards the consumption of alcohol, recreational consumption of alcohol is always wrong; and even the medicinal consumption of such drug should be done in a very limited manner.

  32. Stanley Queen says:

    @SotI

    “Mein Kampf is, again, propaganda tool, which Hitler didn’t take seriously.“

    But people also can’t ignore ‘Mein Kampf’, even if Hitler did not take it “seriously”. Mein Kampf’, authored by Hitler himself, played a large and direct part in getting Hitler into power, and it ultimately speaks directly to Hitler’s character.

  33. Fatih Dion says:

    @Stanley Queen

    “ultimately speaks directly to Hitler’s character.”

    No, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf for following interest of German people, so he can attract them and won democratic election, not really expressing his character enough, if you want to see the real expression of him, read Hitler’s Table Talk

  34. Stanley Queen says:

    @FD

    What are you talking about?

    Hitler’s character was constituted by both his public and private persona and acts (as it is for every other individual), such as his authorship of ‘Mein Kampf’ that helped him get elected into power. The fact that Hitler compromised his private beliefs (as the admins of this site puts it) when communicating to the public speaks volumes to his character.

  35. Janus says:

    @SotI

    “He merely practiced abstaining from alcohol and animal products for himself, he didn’t have time to ban dairy products etc since war was brewing and German society has other more pressing needs.”

    If it were only for himself or for destructive purposes, then he couldn’t have sustained that abstinence in the long run. His asceticism was the result of earnestness and devoting himself only to creative work. As Otto Dietrich once put it, it increased his zeal for work.

    “Also, why would National Socialism ban alcohol? Alcohol was not made with animal products; I think it would be fine to consume alcohol as long as no cruelty ensues after that.”

    According to Kubizek, Hitler was radically opposed to alcoholism just as much as smoking. Cruelty develops out of habit.

    @FD

    “No, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf for following interest of German people, so he can attract them and won democratic election, not really expressing his character enough, if you want to see the real expression of him, read Hitler’s Table Talk”

    No one can deny that what he says in Mein Kampf is consistent with what he later says in his Table Talk. For instance, he said science would eventually triumph over religion in both writings. You can’t explain that away as propaganda.

  36. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    Varg Vikernes claims that ”Nordic is the European race, unmixed- Germanic is a language group — and originally just a name for one of many European tribes.”

  37. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    So maybe it does back up the point that Nordic used in place for whites by people like Hans F.K Gunther

  38. John Johnson says:

    Wow, 12 comments on March 4. Spamming again I see, Otto.

    “Hitler constantly pointed out the State was merely a political construct that should be designed to protect the “Volk”, those of the same “Race” and “Blood”…”
    “The idea that you believe that the “German Volk”, is just any individual from any non-German land is ridiculous…”

    “We have this folk of ours that is not to be defined as a race, and this is now clear to millions. However, when I began my career twenty-five years ago, this was not the case; then I was always told by bourgeois circles: “Yes, folk and race are one and the same.” No, folk and race are not the same! Race is a component of blood – a blood kernel, but a folk is very often composed not of one but of two, three, four or five different blood kernels.” – Adolf Hitler

    “Is it blood? Blood is a common possession, but that has not prevented men who spoke one language to have been at loggerheads with each other for centuries. Is it our common economic interests? But that has not prevented the hardest struggles from taking place precisely in this sphere. Is it our history? We know it only too well: a sad tale of war and dissension. Is it religion which is common to us all? No, here too we have fought and disputed with each other … In the same way it is not common customs nor common usages. No, it is something quite different which not merely brings us to this community but even makes it inevitable. It is our common fate, that common fate which none can escape and which is the lot of all life upon this earth.” – Adolf Hitler

    http://aryanism.net/culture/folk-and-nation/

    The fact that you don’t read our writings and continue to spam us is ridiculous.

    @Daniel
    “I came up against a phrase in Main Kampf, where Hitler said something like no ”Negro” or ”Chinaman” would ever ”become German” just because has learned to speak German.”

    It is true that someone cannot change their ethnicity. But they can change their nationality. “German” refers to both an ethnicity and a nationality, which I imagine is something many people in the 20th century didn’t bother to understand, as many rightists and false leftists aren’t able to understand it today, either.

    @SotI

    “Your wording is a bit improper. Hitler didn’t destroy German culture; he was improving it and purifying it from Jewish corruption.”

    Hitler remarked that there were “two Germanys”. He was seeking to rid Germany not only of Jewish corruption, but of the 2nd Germany–which consisted of Western ignobility from Gentiles.

    @SQ

    “authored by Hitler himself, played a large and direct part in getting Hitler into power, and it ultimately speaks directly to Hitler’s character.”

    Mein Kampf was propaganda (i.e. rhetoric designed to convince others to take a certain position on topics). It speaks much more to the character of the average German voter (i.e. who Hitler was trying to gain the support of through his propaganda), rather than Hitler’s personal beliefs.

    “The fact that Hitler compromised his private beliefs (as the admins of this site puts it) when communicating to the public speaks volumes to his character.”

    Yes, it means he was willing to play the game to get elected and thereby gain the power to actually change the world, rather than remain some obscure author or isolated monk who was “too good” to ever enter into the battleground.

    His character was that of a Man Against Time, not merely a Man Above Time.

  39. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    @John

    But when he said no Negro or Chinaman can never become German, wasn’t that OBVIOUSLY an ethnic thing?

  40. John Johnson says:

    “But when he said no Negro or Chinaman can never become German, wasn’t that OBVIOUSLY an ethnic thing?”

    I just read this passage in MK, and Hitler is criticizing “civic nationalists” who believe that merely teaching a group a language (thereby assimilating/changing them culturally) is enough to improve a nation’s quality.

    “Even in Pan-German circles one heard the opinion expressed that the Austrian
    Germans might very well succeed in Germanizing the Austrian Slavs, if only the
    Government would be ready to co-operate. Those people did not understand that a
    policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings. What they mostly meant by Germanization was a process of forcing other people to speak the German language… What makes a people or, to be more correct, a race, is not language but blood. Therefore it would be justifiable to speak of Germanization only if that process could change the blood of the people who would be subjected to it, which is obviously impossible.”

    i.e. cultural assimilation or “civic nationalism” alone is unable to improve the quality of individuals, therefore the state must consider heritable biological qualities.

    Apparently some people in the German Empire and Austria-Hungary believed making everyone speak German was enough to “Germanize” them, and Hitler is using the ‘extreme’ example of “blacks” and Chinese to demonstrate that civic nationalists at the time couldn’t justify how these more-ethnically-distinct groups could be turned into ethnic Germans merely by a change in language.

    In this passage it does seem like he is appealing to ethnocentric Germans who believe that “blacks” and Chinese cannot be Germans due to their ethnic background, but you can see quite clearly how the two quotes I just posted contradict any ethnocentric sentiments in this earlier MK quote. It is not common ethnicity, but common purpose, which forms a folk.

  41. Stanley Queen says:

    @JJ

    “Yes, it means he was willing to play the game to get elected… [h]is character was that of a Man Against Time, not merely a Man Above Time.”

    Fair enough; I don’t see anything disagreeable with what you wrote.

    “I just read this passage in MK, and Hitler is criticizing “civic nationalists” who believe that merely teaching a group a language (thereby assimilating/changing them culturally) is enough to improve a nation’s quality.”

    I actually forgot about that part of ‘Mein Kampf’. Thank you for pointing it out.

  42. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    When dealing with such a race as Slavic – inferior and barbarian – we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy … We should not be afraid of new victims … The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps … I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians …

    —?Benito Mussolini, speech held in Pula, 20 September 1920

  43. @JJ “[The] duty to offer impartial kindness to individuals in need of aid…” So that’s universalism, not being nice to everyone, including our enemies. Thanks for the clarification.

  44. @Everyone I’d like to take the time to add some new terms to the Glossary and expand on the ones we currently have in the Glossary for clarification. I’m good with words and their meanings and I am good at writing and organization, so it won’t be a problem for me.

  45. @Otto Your subversive commentary, inexcusable ignorance of Aryan policies, and generally obnoxious and belligerent nature leads me to believe you are trying to supplant us deliberately. Begone at once, lest we take retaliatory action.

  46. Keynesian says:

    @Anyone

    Out of interest could any of you please tell me what would the general attitude of the supporters of this website and its ideology be towards Napoleon Bonaparte?

    From what I have read here I would imagine that, if any of you feel anything about him at all, it would generally be a feeling that though there are some noble things to admire in him he was a mostly imperfect. A generally benevolent leader who was more ignoble than noble but despite that his minor noble streak was still distinct and very real.

    In terms of good things about Napoleon there is of course the Islamic dimension to him. After conquering Cairo and establishing French rule over Egypt he publicly proclaimed himself a friend to all Muslims and a respecter of their Koran:

    “People of Egypt, they have told you that I come to destroy your religion, but do not believe it; (tell them) in reply, I come to restore your rights, punish the usurpers and that I respect God, his prophet and the Quran more than the Mamluks.” -Napoleon Bonaparte

    In his private letters he also reiterated such favorable sentiments towards Islam:

    “I hope… I shall be able to unite all the wise and educated men of all the countries and establish a uniform regime based on the principles of the Quran which alone are true and which alone can lead men to happiness.” – Napoleon Bonaparte

    Talk of Napoleon actually converting to Islam whilst in Egypt can meaningfully be dismissed as political expediency on his part in order to gain favor in an Islamic country and certainly after he left Egypt there is no evidence to indicate that he continued to publicly adhere to Islam (he never prayed in a mosque and certainly never referred to himself as a Muslim back in France). Despite that however it is nevertheless true to say that he was at the very least a very real admirer of Islam and of potential that that religion could have in bringing about a universalist world.

    Would this fact perhaps indicate some (minor?) degree of what you term ‘nobility’ to be present within Napoleon?

    On the other hand there are many clearly ignoble things about him:

    1. His endeavor to re-institute slavery in Hati and re-formalize racial inequality in France

    2. His formalization of gender inequality via the Napoleonic Code

    Both of these incontestable historical facts would indicate a very real ‘non-Aryan’ presence within him. Though this is only a very cursory analysis of a few particular parts of the long and detailed life of a very complex man, it is nevertheless sufficient to show that on balance he was a genuine mix.

    Am I right in my analysis or well off the mark? In your ideal Aryan world how would Napoleon be remembered by students of history?

    Any responses would be greatly appreciated.

  47. Amaleq says:

    False Flag?

    English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson ‘attacked’ outside McDonald’s by “violent, left-wing extremists”: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/english-defence-league-founder-tommy-12165710

  48. Otto says:

    “Their spirit was and is today also the spirit of the German Homeland”- Adolf Hitler

    Well, some do still fight for the “German Homeland”.

    Do you really think that Adolf Hitler would approve of millions of non-Germans being artificially moved into Germany? Do you really believe that? We are talking about a man who fought against France, Britain and Russia… To adopt Adolf Hitler as a champion of refugees and immigration is an example of the total senility of humanity… And Aryanism.net represents the total senility of humanity. But is that not a reward in itself? In human terms?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>