Anti-Zionism autopilot

For a growing number of progressives, anti-Semitism has become an ideological obligation as central to their political identity as the Universal Basic Income, Green New Deal, a 70-percent marginal tax rate, and free higher education.

the phrase “white Jews” quickly passed into common usage among those on the left eager to exculpate Mallory, Perez, and Sarsour.

Echoing Mallory’s charge that Jews, as a group, are implicated in the oppression of nonwhites, contributors to a recent online symposium asserted that “white Jews benefit from and participate in white supremacy”

Charlottesville, Trump, the alt-right … all of it ought to have demonstrated the folly of this type of thinking, and brought the Jewish community and the progressive rainbow coalition together. After all, Jews and people of color are the unambiguous top targets of white supremacist hate. Instead, there has opened up a rift, as the incessant harping about “white Jews” testifies. Rank, vile, open, gutter-level anti-Semitism is apparently a pleasure that the progressive left is unwilling or unable to abstain from. Why?

The campaign against “white Jews” on the progressive left is not an accident but a determined effort with several concrete ideological purposes. The first is to codify the position of Jews at the bottom of the social justice victim pyramid, as just another category of “whites.” This move is intended to downgrade or even erase anti-Semitism—a sin of which Farrakhanites, radical Islamists, and other important progressive allies are all guilty. “White Jews” erases that sin by stipulating that “Jews,” insofar as they are “white,” cannot actually be victims of hate–because they aren’t, functionally speaking, Jews at all. They are white people, and therefore, by definition, the oppressor and not the oppressed.

“White Jews” is therefore, first and foremost, an epithet—an attempt to make “Jews” synonymous with “white supremacy.”

But the larger point of marking Jews as “white” is to render them political treif—unassimilable into the left’s virtuous coalition of the oppressed, which includes plenty of Third-Worldist groups and alignments that are rooted in a political discourse in which conspiratorial anti-Semitism is normal. The solution that progressives have apparently alighted on is not to educate their allies out of bigotry and ignorance, but to trim “Jewishness” of any traits that might set off wild, conspiratorial fulminations by the people they wish to position as innocent victims.

Notice how it is only Jews who are endowed with a racial descriptor; no one on the left is busy fingering “white Muslims.” This assault on reason and history puts Jews, or “White Jews,” in their place as inherently oppressive and vile, while gifting their valuable history of oppression to its “true” inheritors—namely progressives and their handpicked allies.

Of course the article neglects to mention that Jews have always been “white”, in the sense of being unaffected by segregation policies:

So no, it’s not that we are making it up as we go along, but merely that we are accurately recalling what Jews would rather we did not.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Anti-Zionism autopilot

  1. Manuel Nigao says:

    Jews are not white as they are of Levantine and Semitic origin, whites are Europeans, so the kikes are not white.

  2. Polinc Socjus says:


    Ultimately it doesn’t matter where they came from. It’s where they’re going. If we don’t all pull together they’re gonna go all over our backs one by one.

  3. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    Neo-Nazi who runs the Daily Stormer has Jewish ancestry, according to his mom

    Revealing the secrets of one of Australia’s worst online trolls
    “But what makes Nathaniel Jacob Sassoon Sykes particularly unusual is that, despite his neo-Nazi persona, he himself is a Jew.”

    How many people have just the above two examples misdirected? How much vile hate have both of those Jews spewed on the internet under Hitler’s name? Does the author of the article that is the subject of this post believe that we all live in a vacuum and that no one can see through the lies, as if we’re not in the Information Age, or does he just prey on weak minds? These Jews and “whites” are fucking disgusting, and it amazes me that they still haven’t realized that every time they open their mouths they just expose themselves as the lying degenerate fraudsters they truly are to anyone who is paying attention. History repeats itself, especially for those who cannot learn anything from it.

  4. CX says:

    “How Do Syrian Women Feel about the Men Leaving for Europe as Refugees?”
    Anyone like to comment?

  5. ItIsWhatItIs says:


    “How Do Syrian Women Feel about the Men Leaving for Europe as Refugees?”

    Anyone like to comment?”

    I agree with the Syrian men and women that are interviewed in the video you linked. I don’t see myself leaving a country that is being physically or covertly attacked by enemies. I also agree with the Aryanist position that no one should be forced to reside in a country they do not want to live in.

  6. @MN

    “Jews believe in censorship more than anybody else, all you gotta do is start talking about Jews and you’ll find all the papers will close up on you. They can’t take it, they can’t take any criticism, they’re the most sensitive white people on this Earth. They don’t like you to talk about them, but they wanna talk about everybody else.” ~Malcolm X

    He’s right, you know. The vast majority of Jews today are European and Ukrainian Steppe Converts (from Khazaria) that have no link to (the commonly called) “Semitic” people of the Eastern Mediterranean. Jews are intrinsically tied to “Western Civilization” hence the Deuteronomy passage:

    Deuteronomy 7-6
    “For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.”

    This leads Jews to believe that they’re “chosen” and it led to the Colonial Era of Western Civilization where Europeans traveled the world and thought of most others as brutes.

    The term “white” race initially referred to a perceived moral standing not the skin color, which makes it an alternate version of being “chosen.” The idea of being “white” in this sense is the core of Judaism.

    Western Civilization = Talmud Compatible

  7. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    Thou shalt not lend upon interest to thy brother: interest of money, interest of victuals, interest of any thing that is lent upon interest. — Deuteronomy 23:19

    Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it. — Deuteronomy 23:20

    What is more a colonialist sentiment than the last part of the sentence in Deuteronomy 23:20? Interesting then that western colonialists brought the Hebrew Bible into every land that they settled as well is it not? Furthermore, if we apply the logic of Deuteronomy to the 10 Commandments of the Hebrew Bible, they would read as follows:

    1.) You shall have no other gods before Me. (“Jewish Talmud, makes the “prologue” the first “saying” or “matter” and combines the prohibition on worshiping deities other than Yahweh with the prohibition on idolatry.”)

    2.) You shall make no idols.

    3.) You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.

    4.) Keep the Sabbath day holy.

    5.) Honor your father and your mother. (Even if they mutilate you against your will and consent at birth?)

    6.) You shall not murder, thy brother\Jew, but a foreigner\non-Jew you may murder.

    7.) You shall not commit adultery, against thy brother\Jew, but a foreigner\non-Jew you may commit adultery against.

    8.) You shall not steal, from thy brother\Jew, but a foreigner\non-Jew you may steal from.

    9.) You shall not bare false witness against your neighbor, thy brother\Jew, but a foreigner\non-Jew you may bare false witness against.

    10.) You shall not covet, anything of thy brother\Jew, but a foreigner’s\non-Jew’s possessions you may covet….

    …In the land where thou goest in to possess it.


    The following quotes are also interesting when presented in conjunction with what we know of the Nazarean from Philo’s account, the sect that Jesus the Nazarene would have belonged to: “The Nazarean—they were Jews by nationality JUDEANS —originally from Gileaditis, Bashanitis and the Transjordan… They acknowledged Moses and believed that he had received laws—not this law, however, but some other. And so, they were Jews who kept all the Jewish observances, (Clearly they didn’t, this sentence is contradictory) but they would not offer sacrifice or eat meat. They considered it unlawful to eat meat or make sacrifices with it. They claim that these Books are fictions, and that none of these customs were instituted by the fathers. This was the difference between the Nazarean and the others…”


    “Why hunt ye these creatures of God, which are more noble than you? By the cruelties of many generations they were made the enemies of man who should have been his friends.” — Jesus The Nazarene, Gospel of Thomas

    “Whoso eats the flesh of slain beasts, eats the body of death.” — Jesus The Nazarene, Gospel of Thomas

    “After this Nazarean sect in turn comes another closely connected with them, called the Ossaeans. These are Jews like the former… originally came from Nabataea, Ituraea, Moabitis, and Arielis, the lands beyond the basin of what sacred scripture called the Salt Sea… Though it is different from the other six of these seven sects, it causes schism only by forbidding the books of Moses like the Nazarean….”


    Where the following people correct to varying degrees in their assessments of how the Books of Moses got reattached to the words of Jesus?

    “Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence: and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being. I separate therefore the gold from the dross; restore to him the former, and leave the latter to the stupidity of some, and roguery of others of his disciples. Of this band of dupes and impostors, Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus. These palpable interpolations and falsifications of his doctrines led me to try to sift them apart.” — Thomas Jefferson to William Short, Monticello, 13 April 1820

    “The decisive falsification of Jesus’s doctrine was the work of St. Paul. He gave himself to this work with subtlety and for purposes of personal exploitation. For the Galilean’s object was to liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against Jewish capitalism, and that’s why the Jews liquidated Him.” — Adolf Hitler

    “But I can tell you, you are self-deceivers. You lack the self-knowledge or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, we crucified Jesus but because we gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!

    “Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offense. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it? Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is a mere street brawl.” — Marcus Eli Ravage quoting a Rothschild, THE CENTURY MAGAZINE, JANUARY 1928, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 346-350.

    (Jews certainly did give birth to the western Jesus, just not the real Jesus. They actually did murder him.)

    If Jews have feigned conversion to Christianity many times in the past before, why are Judeo-Christians so quick to believe that Saul the Jew of Tarsus did not also feign conversion?

    “I have now gone through the examination of the four books ascribed to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John; and when it is considered that the whole space of time, from the crucifixion to what is called the ascension, is but a few days, apparently not more than three or four, and that all the circumstances are reported to have happened nearly about the same spot, Jerusalem, it is, I believe, impossible to find in any story upon record so many and such glaring absurdities, contradictions, and falsehoods, as are in those books. They are more numerous and striking than I had any expectation of finding, when I began this examination, and far more so than I had any idea of when I wrote the former part of ‘The Age of Reason.’” — Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>